“PROJECT DATE OF INFORMATION FIELD NO. 40 *- - REPORT _13 DATE ACQUIRED ICABLE SOURCE ;IN FIELD DISTRIBUTION 4 RI NO. DATE GRADE 1 REPORTS OFFICER TO SUBJECT WASH. DISTRIBUTION CS E …”
Searching the archive...
“PROJECT DATE OF INFORMATION FIELD NO. 40 *- - REPORT _13 DATE ACQUIRED ICABLE SOURCE ;IN FIELD DISTRIBUTION 4 RI NO. DATE GRADE 1 REPORTS OFFICER TO SUBJECT WASH. DISTRIBUTION CS E …”
“PROJECT X220ject DATE or FORMATION SOURce Dec 6J FIELD NO. REPORT DATE ACQUIRED CABLE LITAMIL-9 27 ^c 63 IN -- DATE DISTRIBUTION FIELD 5 -- ----- - r IH* NO. SUBJECT GRADE 16 Jan_6%. TO I REPOR …”
“PROJECT DATE OF INFORMATION FIELD NO. Ko Project Des 63 A 91-8285 REPORT SOURCE DATE ACQUIRED CABLE 27 Dec 63 586 FIELD DISTRIBUTION RI NO. LXTAMIL-9 DATE GRADE 16 Jan 64 REPORTS ofFiczn 32 SUBJECT TO …”
“PROJECT No Project I DATE o "FORMATION sou RCE _Jan 64 FIELD NO. DATE ACQUiRSO - FER CABLE %8291 E— LITAMIL-9 2 Jan64 IN FIELD DISTRIBUTION RI to. DATE 16 Jan 16 65------ - Jan X5 SUBJECT - ~ GRADE 3-2 REPORTS CFFICER TO Visit of Mrita Thrushcheg to Cuba WASH DIS”
“PROJECT DATE Or IORMATIOM FIELD NO. REPORT DATE ACQUIRED CA ELE SOURCE IN -* FIELD DISTRIBUTION RI NO. DATE GRACE REPORTS office SUBJECT TO WASH. DISTRIBUTION c s / EVAL. …”
“/ PROJECT LIENVOY No Project I DATE o TO NATION SOURCE Jen 6% FIELD NO. IDATE ACC0CL '------ 1 REPORT Para. 1 - Lifaril 4 |CABLE t *M 8340 14616 Jan 64 one - Ears. 2 - LIRNYoy FIELD DISTRIBUTION DATE gRsNO. SUBJECT _24 Fan 64 GRADE r …”
“, wo ********** PROJECT DATE or BNCPCRWATION %Project- SOURCE 17 Jan 6% r RESORT FIELD NO. DATE ACOUib 30 Jan 6% — CAuse -WN 8428 m ro u m tii LI.aht.-9 ire FIELD DISTRIBUTION DATE 12- RI No. SUBJECT GRADE 13 Feb & TO RErorrs OFFIcen Technical Problems at the N”
“veoeitieos PROJECT LIZEYOY IDATE OF No rojest INFORMATION SOURCE Ira 1 - Al a Y ‘ 1vissuSs— 64 REPORT CABLE FIELD NO. fe0429 / 926. ‘ ■ Fire 2 LI.ANIL-9 DATE FIELD DISTRIBUTION RI NO. SUBJECT GRADE 23 CAD 64 to IREPORTS OFFiCER …”
“C PROJECT DATE Or INFORMATION FIELD NO. KP Jan 6 REPORT HMIL8430 CABLE ‘JSOUnce DATE ACQUIRED ,IN 30 Jan 64 FIELD DISTRIBUTION RI no. LITAMIL-9 DATE 13 Feb 64 REFCHIS OFFICER GRade 3-2 1 …”
“PROJECT DATE OF INFORMATION Project FIELD NO. Jan 64 REPORT EMX-8431 SOURCE DATE ACQUIRED CABLE Jan 64 ■; IN LIT D-9 FIELD DISTRIBUTION Ml NO. DATE 13 zeb 64 GRADE 9-2 : REPORTS OFFICER SUBJEC …”
“* PROJECT . ILIFLAT / P DATE Or INFORMATION 26-27 Fos 69 FIELD NO. / ISOURCE REPORT DATE ACQUIRED- a 8535 CA BLE LITZAY / 20 Feb - 1 *r 64 8389.... LitANIL 9• !594 — FIELD ___ , DISTRIBUTION RI NO. DATE GRADE 4 & …”
“PROJECT HP DATE OF INFORMATION SOURCE X Kar $ FIELD NO. DATE acounED -— REPORT LITANIL-9 1DF8537----- 1 Kar 64 CABLE DATE FIELD DISTRIBUTION RI NO. SUBJECT - ----- -—- 4 Kar 64 — GRADE -3-2- To REPORTS OFFICE …”
“PROJtor DATE OF INFORMATION FIELD NO. EP 1 Mar 64 REPORT Em-8541 SOURCE DATE ACQUIRED CABLET 1 Kar 64 !IN LITAMIL-9 FIELD DISTRIBUTION RI NO. DATE GRADE BE2 REPORTS OFICIm GUEJCCT TO PLS/j …”
“… sout. PROJECT * - - - LIKIVOY/n) DATE or INFORMATION SOURCE -------------------- fur 1# Lixavo early ar 66 19 Fob - DATE ACQUIRED / REPORT FIELD NO. . CABLE —808402, 86lll zura 2a 12-2-91/ 20 Zeb * In “F 64 I1 DATE FIELD DISTRIBUTION : PS NO. SUTJECT GRADE 25:2eb/1.m w2 …”
“J e w welye. PROJECT HP DATE CF INFORMATION faUMMMAaiAMMMMa^^ # SOURCE 2 Kaz 64 FIELD NO. DATE ACQUIRED------- - F Loper LITANIL-9 , —WM 8612 10 ar64 DATl IELD DISTRIBUTION SUBJECT IGraSE - 19 lar6 Fro - B-2_ ;REPORTS OFFICER Efforts of sose kee 1 Imesuelan, tco ”
“PROJECT DATE OF INFORMATION FIELD NO. E. P. 19 Mar 63 REPORT are gore SOURCE DATE ACQUIRED CABLE 20 Far 63 LITAMIL-9 FIELD DISTRIBUTION ' RI NO. DATE 2 Apr 63 GRADE -2 4 REPORTS OFFICER SUBJ …”
“PROCT IDATE OF INFORMATION NP SOURCE 1 20 Far ft FIELD No. neromt but”679 LITAMIL-9 IDATE COGReD 1 Apr 64 Teaale MJ1 866 FIELD DISTRIBUTION DATE 2 Apr 64------ -,Re NO. SUBJECT GRADE X***X Teser _REPORTS ofriciza ,TO Comments of Joaquin CZaMANDEZ Arzas, Cuban WASH. ”
“suai eumon wtiwhliitiddii-d-i--ownise. * PROJECT KP DATE or INFORMATION SURE 2 Mar 64 REPcrf FIELD NO. 4 1 DATE ACQUIRED—— LITAMIL-9 1Apr 64 CA BLE RNU 8705__ 186 ■ DA TE FIELD DISTRIBUTION RI NO. 8704 SUBJECT GRADE 14-Apr-64 'to B-2 —___ I REPORTS OFFICER-----”
“PROJECT DATE OF WNFORN/TION KP SOURCE FIELDNO 24.ar C4 JREPORT DATE ACQUIRED «:A BLE S-m8705 LITAMIL-9 1 Apr 64 15 FIELD DISTRIBUTION I Pi NO. DATE SHADE :—14 Apr 64 SUBJECT TO -lescr REPORTS OFFICER I Restrictions on Cuban Government Scholarship WASH DISTRIBUTION ”
“soorce ard : COMMENTS to fiip.en , merely lai“TOretoe on such in the source the direct —folloved description subsooce description. -he ap,r oved decer! "A G ban exile in lexico st.o is in - wall boehots vol anti-Castro organisations." Couch is 1s tied Cotry rint th loon ”
“PROJECT DATE OF INFORMATION FIELD NO. BP Late Farch 64 REPORT FXM-B706____ SOURCE DATE ACQUIRED CABLE 1 Apr 6% twi LITAX 11-9 FIELD DISTRIBUTION I ms NO. DATE GRADE 1A Apr 64 j REPORTS OFFICER …”
“JJECT DATE of INFORMATION FIELD NO. 1 MP Late Mar 64 04-8709 0011 SOURCE DATE ACQUIRED CABLE 1 Apr 64 Mt LITAIL-9 FIELD DISTRIBUTION RI NO. DATE 14. Azr 64 GRADE ; REPORTS OFFICER SUBJECT TO WASH. DISTRIBUTION Lrus/et CS EVAL. REQUESTED v Plan of Mexican Government”
“PWLECT DATE OF INFORMATION FIELD NO. NP 26 Har 64 REPORT DATE ACQUIRED CABLE HIOL-8712 SOURCE 1 Apr 64 ** LITAMIL-9 FIELD DISTRIBUTION ,RI NO. 1 ADI 64 DATE GRADE iREPORTS OFFICER TO 2 …”
“PROJECT DATE OF INFORMATION FIELD NO. IP 10-13 Apr 64 REPORT W8912____ SOURCE DATE ACQUIRED CABLE 10-13 Apr 6i LITAMIL-9 FIELD DISTRIBUTION RI MO. DATE 28 May 64 11 GRADE REPORTS OFFICER 0-2- …”
“w -a z -td ,-,- DATE of INFORMATION E w i V 74$ * • 9 + 0 * 7 1 9 - PROJECT FIELD NO. NONE A ril 1964 REPORT PM 8925 DATE ACQUIRED CABLE SCARCE 10 April 196; IN FIELD DISTRIBUTION RI NO. LITAMII-9 DATE 20 May 1964 GRADE B-3— REPORTS OFFICER …”
“* * --,- PROJECT HP 1 DATE - INFORMATION SOURCE 4 Jun 65 _REPORT LITANIL-9 "Potity- ■ ICABLE ---------------- — IN SUBJECT Dave 11 SumZBuTcn GRADE 4-0____ ______ _ RI NO. bian.skilie boalur mxevl. Plans to Invite the Cuban TO i REPORTS OFFICER—■—- to Jerform in Mex”
“P : “ROTECT I DATE or INFORMATION # ___ soE SOURCE —Jyne 1964 FIELD NO. DATE ACQUIRED REPORT CABLE- HO 0796 LITAVIL.9 4June 1764 02244 IIN—- FIELD DISTRIBUTION DATE RI NO. SUBJECT GRADE TO June 1:64 16__B-2 REPORTI OFFICE …”
“£ PROJECT DATE OF INFORMATION, MP SOURCE tage 9 & 24 funs 641 DATE ACQUIRED -+ REPORT FIELD NO. CamE H9092 19 Jupp 64 N LITAMIL-9 FIELD DISTRIBUTION DATE RI so. 14Jol/ b4- SUBJECT GRADE po ro— so jRECRTS OFFICER - E …”
“PROJECT DATE OF INFORMATION FIELD NO. XP 20 July 64 REPORT .. sOUnce DATE ACQUIRED _9121 CABLE J 23 July 60 IN 2 XI 0357 LITAMIL-9 FIELD DISTRIBUTION Ri NO. DATE GRADE Joly 64. REPORTS OFnc …”
“PROVICT DATE OF INFORMATION FIELD NO. REPORT" source LUINVAY___ 2-cxnaulte 14-Ame 6a CA8LE Un 9109 IN LLENVOY 17 ing 196------------ FIELD DISTRIBUTE N RI NO. LITAMIL-9 ■ DATE …”
“… wax disseminated as a CS reportawith riror editorial canngos. The comment was re-written to include more information from the referenced report. which will snaw that he probably plans to point another rural in Cuba. FORM NO. REPLACES FORM 59.92 688 WHXCH MAY BE USED SOURCE RECOR …”
“… , WH/3 ATTENTION : Mr. John M Whitten SUBJECT LITAMIL/9 C-101331 With reference to your memorandums dated 22 April 1964, requesting a report on the status of the Operational Approval action on Subject, a memorandum setting forth this informations, was forwarded to your office o …”
“… f, WH/3 ATTENTION : Mr. John M. Whitten SUBJECT LITAMIL/9 C-101331 With reference to your memorandum dated 22 April 1964, requesting a report on the status of the Operational Approval action on Subject, a memorandum setting forth this information, was forwarded to your office on 1 …”
“/ r» € ‘* 22 April 1964 MEMORANDUM FOR: CI/OA ATTENTION SUBJECT : LITAMIL-9 (C-101331) It is requested that a report be sent to the Mexico Desk regarding the status of the Operational Approval action on Subject. The OA was initially requested on 24 June …”
“… onote-ve-ntoiet-sim o- * 22 April 1964 MEMORANDUM FOR: CI/OA ATTENTION SUBJECT Mae LITAMIL-9 (C-101331) It 18 requested that a report be sent to the Mexico Desk regarding the status of the Operational Approval action on Subject. The GA was Initially requested on 24 June …”
“5 7 November 1963 MEMORANDUM TO: CI/OA SUBJECT LITAMIL-9 (C-101,331) 201-329609 REFS: A. HMMW-11988, 4 October 1963 B. MEXI-6696 (In 49286) 1. At the request of the Chief, CI/OA, reference A was forwarded to Mexico City Station requesting the station to attempt to clar”
“7 November 1963 MEMORANDUM TO: CI/OA SUBJECT : LITAMIL-9 (C-101,331) 201-329609 REFS: A. HMMW-11988, 4 October 1963 B. MEXI-6696 (In 49286) 1. At the request of the Chief, CI/OA, reference A was forwarded to Mexico City Station requesting the Station to attempt to clarify ce”
“… 78r4928S DIR CITE MEXI 6696 DIA PBRUMEN D REF: HXAW 11968 yet 6 i. uccabi nub CBlnul La-vLoLe MI raninova rvn nogc RELIABILITY 1959 REPORT FROM AnrunO THAT LITAMIL-S BELIEVED TO BE COMMUNIST SINCE THIS CONFLICTS YITN NUMBEROUS REPORTS RECEIVED FROM OTHER SOURCES MORE CLOSELY …”
“… tninctitildatitrilbivz-t-Advm0t-AL--nsl Reaus REF: HMMW 11988 TC. 8 uwdoDol nuo 0BIMGL LA VLOLE MI reninova run nobs RELIABILITY 1959 REPORT FROM THAT LITAMIL-9 BELIEVED TO BE COMMUNIST SINCE THIS CONFLICTS WITH NUMBERO JS REPORTS AA :l — r A M A—se AA-I we -p. a A A • _6 -e • …”
“CASOFCH ON PIOCESSNAD ACTION DISPATCH SECRET wango FOR MOENA voy, Chief of Station, Mexico City NO **** 00080 ewO CRY TAUES UM tam jod Noras FROM Chief, WH Division iocto use SUEJIC PBRUKEN/OA for LITAMIL-9 ACTON * QUPED WFURONCES f REFERENCES: A. XKXI 1506, 26 July”
“i CLASSIFICATION DISPATCH SYMBOL AND NUMBER CONTINUATION OF DISPATCH SECRET HON-11988 KUDESK does not consider that this was accomplished by the Station's answer contained in Ref C. 5. KUDESK has informed the desk that an OA for LITAMIL-9 cannot be granted until their req”
“DISPATCH CLASSFCHON .POC 9310D ACTION SECRET was Rib vR HOM TO Chief of Station, Mexico City moastro*90 FO O1 QUALIFIED CES* CAN s*XE sot InDEXING InDExaM FROM Chief, TO Division scu SUExov PERUKEN/OA for LITAMIL-9 ACT * * COPED DFUPEMCES * REFERENCES: A. MEXI 15”
“Sfraaist 1 CLASSIFICATION DISPATCH SYM OL WD NUMBER CONTINUATION OF DISPATCH SECRET HWW-11988 KUDESK does not consider that this was accomplished by the Station's answer contained in Ref C. 5. KUDESK has informed the desk that an OA for LITAMIL-9 cannot be granted until”
“… AMIL 9 Attached herewith are contact reports of mootings with LI TMIL-9 on 17 and 29 July 1963. Willard C CURTIS Attachment: Contact Report Distribution: 2 - C/WHD w/2/att 2 - C/SAS w/2/att 2 - CCS WATS w/2/att 3 - Files E. - try 26 COSS REFERENCE to OSParci SYVsO, wo …”
“… tings with LUTMIL-9 on 17 and 29 July 1963. wadludEos 3 9 4 3 tie Willard C CURTIS PSAMIEIN" Attachment: w a tu te n il Contact Report Distribution: 2 - C/-D w/2/att 2 - C/SAS w/2/att 2 - COS WAVE w/2/att 3 - Files * K. *14 e COSS ACFEOENCE TO DISPATCH STUBO, MO …”
“% (0) : t. (for ia -2 € 5.3 6. 10 1)1- t ( * a co com (- 1: 02 C. - C. *o - ‘• DOS 5. L-9 reports th 15 V seems to romect tim 1: - 4° - • 6 « v.- ver: cidy antis di da- 223 — thus Lo cto C C 2 - dotidi ze - -ight 1973 10 0 -. 8 6.While he SD 3° :LVX d”
“… l Approval for Subject's use, your attention is directed to derogatory information forwarded by Station Mexico to the effect that an ODIBEX report dated 25 August 1959 stated . - noterers **2.4 46 munist and one of the most influential members of the Cuban Embassy staff. 2. On 18 Se …”
“granted only for training of Subject. The Provisional Operational specified that approval for operational use of the Subject was deferred pending satisfactory resolution of the derogatory information, which CI Staff did not consider to have been accomplished. The PRQ Part II on S”
“… l Approval for Subject’s use, your attention is directed to derogatory information forwarded by Station Mexico to the effect that an ODIBEX report dated 25 August 1959 stated ... noAyes or a munist and one of the most influential members of the Cuban Embassy staff. 2. On 18 Septembe …”
“granted only for training of Subject. The /* ine Provisional Operational Approval specified that approval for operational use of the Subject was deferred pending satisfactory resolution of the derogatory information, which CI Staff did not consider to have been accomplished. The”