“it in the final report. Could we have more details? Very truly yours, NW 65924 Docld:32370547 Page 5 S. D. Breckinridge Principal Coordinator, HSCA 5”
“ed affirmatively but indicated that his position in answering HSCA questions would remain unchanged. NW 66000 Docld:32271380 Page 13”
“itation. 7. The matter tends to become political, in addition to whatever legal questions there are. NW 65924 Docld:32354856 Page 3 HSCA Hearings 4 AUG 1978 I. II. The HSCA has scheduled public hearings for August, September, and November. :”
“the HSCA and gave them his telephone number) (376-5565) Elder will keep us posted of developments. : 4. I stated that we are trying to look ahead to potential problems that can be resolved before the last minute. I asked specifically what plans they had for the public hearings in”
“m responding to the above request. It is requested that y ou furnish a copy of th e enclosed memo ra ndum to the HSCA. Enclosures (2) 62-117290 " RRCB:pm (7) GITAL Assoc. Dir. Dep.”
“age 138, line 13. Change "him" to "them." 3 CONFIDENTIAL NW 65924 Docld:32352647 Page 4 CONFIDENTIAL I understand from your conversation with Rodger that you would welcome a letter from the Agency, on this section of the report, for inclusion with it in the final report. Could we”
“se call Jackie Hess at the Committee offices. GRB:jsc Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. cc: Mr. G. M. Andricos Asst. (DSAA-ISA) Sincerely, B. Robert Blobby G. Robert Blakey Chief Counsel and Director NW 66000 Docld:32245478 Page 4”
“granted no 4/2 . both in the order and our proposed statute, particularly in the area of requirements. ' 24 it‘s import ant to haze this caveat, if vou il 1. oR Now recommendation 1 : really suggests that- the oversight TOP SECRET v**D A AUL NW 50955 DocId:32423509 ”
“attached to the file copy of enclosed LHM. Exact copies of the materials being furnished are mainta ined in the office of the SENSTUD Y Project and a detail ed record has been maintained of the materials furnished. Arrangements have been made for a represe ntative of the Legal Co”
“of e y/ S reports hande toyasewing 1/11/1/200126 th 15 A Demanded 13. si (> Thooah heJ. Thomy case, D.K., d e they gasran AthuR Deride Dec J Ahaol d Till Herri e O.K. Lost frerend 1N 15. Are shoulIsdcable be sufficient is Es otlohoner fal A D 16. report to You”
“a "message" to all witnesses to keep quiet (e.g. Roselli and Maheu), there is a violation of law which we might have the responsibility to investigate. Beyond what our responsibility is, it seems clear to me that most extreme possibilities of what might actually have happen”
“14-00000 worst -2- del Karte REVIEWING OFFICER’S COMMENTS Cord Meyer, Jr.YX Assistant Deputy Director for Plans 30 Apriquiel 69 V in eves 8 , $ o mre 1 0”
“would preclude the Board from disputing the validity of such a regulation at a later date.' None of the above options guarantee success. However, I have discussed these options with Dawn Eilenberger, and we believe that Option #_ is the best approach to take. OIM concurs. Ple”
“- Now, I realize that we have said that our other recommen 22 - dation by implication, would prohibit this, but it is only by 23 implication, I would think. 24 Mr. Maxwell. My sense is that by providing this 25 Mr. Aaron. You kind of create a channel. TAR ERPDET • NW 50”
“me Section 0.15(b) (7) under your proposed Order. The following is in response to your nemorandum of April”
“files will turn out have been lost or destroyed. The proposed Review Board would thus have to confess not only that it chose”
“review these sections and then discuss with him the questions presented by his request. cc: SA/DDCI DDO (Mr. Shepanek) 4 LA Division (Mr. Sturbitts) S.D. Breckinridge OGC (Mr. Rininger) NW 65924 DocId:32347079. Page 6.”
“this would 22 not pick up that kind of abuse that you have discussed here. 23 Mr. diGenova. Suppose it had been disposed of to Admiral 24 Raborn, and they knew.about it, and the AG said, why is this 25 being done? It would raise a red flag which would not otherwise TAB C”
“further information from the - Department about this natter since last June. For the purposes of - completing our record on this subject, I would appreciate it if you would inform the Committee whether the Department has received any additional information about this subject ”
“recognition. 3. It is recommended that a copy of this memorandum be placed in Scuat’s personnel folder. ro- *% David Chillies S-E-C-R-E-T”
“13-00000■ 04/16/97 WED 16:15 FAX 202 724 0457 AKiW Mr. J. Barry Harrelson April 16, 1997 Page 12 Conclusion Please let me know if you have any supplements or corrections. We would very much like to ensure that these matters are handled expeditiously. As always, we appre”
“ed LHM, it will not be necessary for Jacksonville to report this information under the HART caption. NW 66000 Docld:32340364 Page-4 3. CONFIDENTIAL”
“in Northern California until the local CP resolves its policy with regard to this committee. APPENDIX PAGE -10- SA 285 NW 88613 Docld:34528578 Page 13”
“If it does come to pass. thon Fl1g igan isguo that needs to be QL 29 addressed. Nor the other question is should rema in " ilent on it *2.1 intha ro*ir+ ar lo in} ior -oindica Fad hiora Laave An it as it in until much kimo -it has been determined that it TOP SECRET”
“check for subject with the hope that requirements will be forthcoming based on the contents of this memo. WWKonicki:jd S -***.:. 2Bet* irity Information”
“ACTION THIS CASE UNTIL ADVISED. MOF DID NOT QUESTION THIS RATIONALE AND PROMISED TO COMPLY. wa Dw 3. PLS IDENTIFY CARE? MENTIONED PARA 2.REF. SECRET * SECRET”
“Cornwell said he would check with Blakey on the points we raised and let me know. cc: O/DDCI SA/DO/O NW 65924 Docld:32366893 Page 2 Mr. Grinwis IC Staff George Bary GEORGE L. CARY Legislative Counsel Ex. Sec. DDA DDS&T Mr. Lapham Mr. Hetu Comptroller NFAC INTERNAL USE OLLY. 17470”
“pertaining to him has not been feasible." w N /s e 3. (U) Recommendations: See Tabs 12-4S. ig "d s p 4. (U) This memorandum has as yet not been coordinated XX with Mr. Zicbell of the Office of the General Counsel. is q p z g riyalA Winthrop W. Brown (C) -e v ”
“prevent any possible embarrassment to Bureau, ) 8 9-13-67 NW 88321 Docld:32989529 Page 1283”
“consistent with the 1400.5. ! I recommend that the Board, in the near future, deliberate on the guidance that it wishes to give to the staff regarding these matters. 9^”
“late February unless she give us specific areas that would allow us to show "our superiors” that talking to her should be given a kghm higher pro priority the 044N other committee business. Tom „ Ton NW 50955 DocId: 32423630 Page 86”
“sides of the first page (which uccl- au t*&0 (9 pages). a . I would appreciate your furnishing these copies at the earliest feasible time. Thanks, c* Eras B Gridin Counsel a 2 I SECRET SENSITIVE "o’ % HW 50955 bocld:32105598 Page 243”
“14-00000 CONFIDENTIAL 5. Mr. Strickland of OGC has concurred in these recommendations. A. B. Swider DDO Appeals Officer Attachments: Tab A - References A-C . Tab B - Full Text and Sanitized Versions Tab C - Army Document for Referral -3- CONFIDENTIAL”
“ecome Section 0.15(b) (7) under your proposed Order. The following is in response to your nemorandum of Apri”
“ecome Section 0.15(b) (7) under your proposed Order. The following is in response to your nemorandum of Apri”
“were to come down, they would probably have indicated in their 25 report that they had passed this information on. NW 50955 DocId:32202440 Page 41 TA D CECDET”
“certainly have placed a severe burden on the FCD. Further, NOSENKO contends that the results which might reasonably be expected would be of little' or no practical value to the SCD. 0001170 10”
“further questions in this regard. please call me directly at (703) 351-2909. BH:gb Barry Hamel FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY %”
“like to help you. I am prepared to -3 | specualte as I have been doing on things that are somewhat 24 beyond my direct experience and direct responsibility. There n. h is a limit. Mr. Goldsmith. Now, if someone checking ISR notes that NW 48331 DocId: 32277210 Page 39 REO”
“subject and I have no further information or details concern ing this. Orig - OS/SAG Jaside P. Hayes SE/PCH 1 - SE/SEC 1 - LA/SO 1 - Hayes E2 IMPDET CL BY 017709 3.3(6 SECGET”
“Intelligence, and it is not mentioned in the report, 25 and it should be, and it is a problem that we- have had, Mr. - ran enonmm . . / NW 50955 Docld:32423513 Page 39”
“ingt spotting 9 O it at these various places whether we couldn’t make a general rocommenda tion. We‘ve already rot the Attorney Heneral on the 9.4 Committed and Ulat he regie ir not all practices t-th ot least 25: wha teye P oooatd ces , Pin sage I an age we were inml tai”
“of anyone. As a 25 matter of fact, the memorandums on ' this refer to dozens of tenesone NW 50955 DocId: 32423513 Page 36”
“should take direct action. I called the OSI Reviewed By AFOSI J3 1468 For Public Disclosure In Accordance With a JFKARCA, 1992 RUB 14 AUG 95 NW 88613 Docld:34530447 Page 14”
“ARISES, HOWEVER, NO EXACT PERCENTAGE AVAILABLE SI NCE COUNT ER INT ELL IGENCE MATTER S GREATLY FL UCT UATE. END 1l MDR 2 16 STE P.2AKT 31•* 12/01 3/6 v a —-NM/-88296-Docld:32989628 Page.296.”
“WEEK. 4. WE HAVE REVIEWED DOCUMENTS FORWARDED REF B AND GECRET”
“does not appear that it was handled indiscreetly and. therefore, no administrative action is recommended. 0 A .60 -2- NW 88326_Docld:32989704 Page 156”
“matter and see no need to pursue it further at this time. Attachment: Sohn Tins Tarwag JCHN kb MAURY Legislative Counsel Plutribetion: Original - CLC Subject ehe 1.20? 1 - Chief, Ci State 1 - Chief, SB Division 1 - D Security * - EG 1 - OLC Chroco EGRET so”
“on of other government agencies unless specifically directed by the Attorney General to investigate. REPRODUCTION PROHIBITED NW 65990 Docld:32390932 Page 4 0003668 PAGE 14 of COPY NO. 65 4 ーヤー”
“the Agency did’ not so interpret them. 69 HW 50955 DocId:32423525 Page 175”