“WEEK. 4. WE HAVE REVIEWED DOCUMENTS FORWARDED REF B AND GECRET”
“WEEK. 4. WE HAVE REVIEWED DOCUMENTS FORWARDED REF B AND GECRET”
“above listed documents many Sum- maries of file reviews, depositions of employees, interviews of employees, etc, are cited in the report. 2001022 Classification: SPA.am/mrem 471 ._% LhtLon, d NW 48327 DocId:32263889 Page 372”
“al Attache is making special flight for this purpose. Legal officer going to Dallas promised to mail th is”
“of e y/ S reports hande toyasewing 1/11/1/200126 th 15 A Demanded 13. si (> Thooah heJ. Thomy case, D.K., d e they gasran AthuR Deride Dec J Ahaol d Till Herri e O.K. Lost frerend 1N 15. Are shoulIsdcable be sufficient is Es otlohoner fal A D 16. report to You”
“hat this would not be necessary. He returned our exhibits and told us to consider the matter closed. NW 65990 Docld:32392257 Page 9”
“information of a collateral nature. (See Section III, H.) Attachment: Typed cpy Memo from NOSENKO . 5 6001055 edrErdridorhi) a-.mP LAE”
“that that this case will start moving soon. mnenlntiee”
“ake The resicet. of Suck step was docutiofe cutifoofer weighing all foreters in the wor confetty aud we felt that HEWIRELESS. concluding that the hey to the solution acting in his ocon behalf. t A NW 65924 Docld:32349378 Page 3”
“andS±af£75.Fol Director will agree to allow Counsel to be present during one Enclosures ST-106 00 mrrems ENDS-sh WOC:ebc (9) 50 APR.A. NW 88296 Dpcld:32989628 Page 136 5 CONTINUED - OVER end 6000”
“of.”- • that meeting. Subj reported that Loginov had called him on 15 Apr requesting - a meet somewhere outside; Subj insisted that Loginov come to his office. -: CA Rdp Co (P-2712) 1P-- 11713 0 00”
“connection with cases captioned: BERNARD S. LEE, Y REC-46 CLARENCE M. KEPA 62-117290-638 ET (U.S.D .C., D.C.) CIVIL ACTION #76-1185 B UF ILE 62-117194 -Bureau (Encs. 14) (1-package) 2-M emphi”
“wiIte Warrend Commission and th Oswal to Mclerge Persating the co- CTA Stery 6”
“ACTION THIS CASE UNTIL ADVISED. MOF DID NOT QUESTION THIS RATIONALE AND PROMISED TO COMPLY. wa Dw 3. PLS IDENTIFY CARE? MENTIONED PARA 2.REF. SECRET * SECRET”
“22. document in front of you, Memorandum for the Record. 13 Mr. Nosenko. I do not have it. 24 Mr. Klein. The Ryan Report. I draw your attention to page 05 9. NW 50955 DocId: 32277209 Page 50 otLitI de- lease V 04 iti 4 wn7-7zsa S BIM: IICont "^ro ‘orm"UsEcaxe9%-e-rreype”
“office should be requested to make tho Informant available to the Burean for thorough intervien ret NW 66000 Docld:32338743 Page 10 CONFIDENTIAL CONKIDENTIAL”
“COBTA-RICAN COURTS OPPORTUNITY pis-,irota@i OF CHRLBAN GOVERNMENT REQUEST TO EXTRADITE THEM, SCRET 4 5 0 1 pit”
“attached to the file copy of enclosed LHM. Exact copies of the materials being furnished are mainta ined in the office of the SENSTUD Y Project and a detail ed record has been maintained of the materials furnished. Arrangements have been made for a represe ntative of the Legal Co”
“13-00000■ 04/16/97 WED 16:15 FAX 202 724 0457 AKiW Mr. J. Barry Harrelson April 16, 1997 Page 12 Conclusion Please let me know if you have any supplements or corrections. We would very much like to ensure that these matters are handled expeditiously. As always, we appre”
“11110773 SIR a which the sidgice was the source DCD wile not release hese reports era te mail. However, y subject wishes to see therr, we wile allow Her to revrio then, in sanitized four in te presence y ar agency opicer”
“his representative review the documentation that backs up the narrative. The documentation has not b een keyed into the narrative presentation, but it follows the chronologi- cal order of presentation from 9 October into the lat est developments in the matter, an d there is an ov”
“full time services’1. 1, I pointed out the above chron with respect to the ever increasing usage of subject's time to, Rieneha 1 who apparently feels the last memo in OK unless CPD desires to make a formal objection and return it. Paul Paul - ok to prepare- re will hol ”
“been furnished to the recipients of this letter. No investigation is requested since this matter is being handled through the appropriate -Legal Attaches, It”
“me Section 0.15(b) (7) under your proposed Order. The following is in response to your nemorandum of April”
“ect in the CAVBOMB case. He asked LAPORIS how the business was coming, and he replied that they were NW 65994 Docld:32292137 Page 3 2 CV 157-127 :”
“entative during deposition or providing written "responses to questions & will let you know outcome. ORM610 US USE PREVIOUS EDITIONS ☐ ☐ ☐SECRET CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY ☐ UNCLASSIFIED NW 65924 Docld:32343547 Page 2”
“he instructed MEROLA at that time to have nothing to do with the matter and he should not handle it. NW 64578 Docld:32332334 Page 3 - 2 -”
“ecome Section 0.15(b) (7) under your proposed Order. The following is in response to your nemorandum of Apri”
“ecome Section 0.15(b) (7) under your proposed Order. The following is in response to your nemorandum of Apri”
“disposition. Please direct any further inquiries regarding this matter to W. Curtis Chaloner at 40552 (secure). W. Curtis Chaloner for John K. Reilly FOR—OFFICIAL USE ONLY”
“14-00000‘ % A m a o i itis U & 6 2. Thank you for your response So this case. Ye would appreciate any additional data you can provide ca (c) above and we will try to keep you advised of further interest in leads which you forward. JAES R. MULTAY .LICrant/L= 1 cc”
“r your approval and forwarding to the SSC is the original of a memorandum in further partial respone n to the aforementioned two SSC requests. Also enclosed for your records is a copy of the memorandum which is being delivered to you with a set of the materials which are being de”
“p.m., the hearing in the 21 above -mentioned matter was concluded.) 22 23 24 © 25 TOP SECRET”
“exhibits, have same reviewed by Mr. Wilderotter. INTD will insure exhibits are made available for Mr. Wilderotter's review. NRW Cig ath Wife -2- NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 259”
“Txk***3og"z MXMXEX If they are favorable to this procedure take all possible measures to prepare for the i-meditate transmittal of such a re@tet short of the actual preparation of a written document|y-the-dissidents) for advance transfer to you. %, Goodwin a % * 1’* ,7”
“his regard we are forwarding herewith a list of several such allegations which have been made during the past few”
“it, say by next Tuesday or so. in event we do not have a reply to Mr. r. Toomey cable by that date. : 03 Criginal & cc: Mr. Harvey for ZRGRACE File cc: 201-282337 (Mitchell 201) 2 cc: C/S, SRS, Mr. J D. Noell NW 65987 Docld:32411536 Page 4”
“approach to his resettlement. Subject was advised to work on his legend until CO would co-,% 66 0, on Friday.”
“m responding to the above request. It is requested that y ou furnish a copy of th e enclosed memo ra ndum to the HSCA. Enclosures (2) 62-117290 " RRCB:pm (7) GITAL Assoc. Dir. Dep.”
“retain a copy of the affidavit. A copy will remain on file at the Committee and accessible to you at any time. I look forward to receiving the sworn statement. Once again many thanks for your cooperation and careful attention to this matter. Fredricka Barry Frederick D. B”
“it up. Mr. Aaron. Or may type it up. 1. \ 24 25. Mr. Kirbow. Well, is this the same point that we're NW 50955 DocId: 32423513 Page 18”
“were to come down, they would probably have indicated in their 25 report that they had passed this information on. NW 50955 DocId:32202440 Page 41 TA D CECDET”
“the case will be closed. a -5- XR OLUKEI 0rg “982 -NW-88326-Docld:32989Z04 Page 268”
“IN CUPA. 2. IN VIEW OF Tun ADCVE, UE HAVE NOT PPT NOT FORWARDED YOUR LETTER OUT SUBSTITUTED A DRAFT ALONC LINES SUdgesrim BY FIRPT FI. WE HAVE POUCHED YOU A COPY AND YOU WILL NOTE THAT IS IS VAGUE AND EVASIVE. THIS HAS BEEN DONE DELIBERATELY HITA THE HOPE THAT IT WILL AROUSE”
“made up regarding the - child. CS COPY 4. LIRING/4, who was not witting of the above action of LInIRG/3, accepted Ait”
“consideration in the above matter is if all the information from NOSENKO is accepted, what effect would or could it have on the efforts 19 0001087 OCODLT OLUALT”
“14-00000 BECHET GrTA 2541 8. Paria/LCPIPIT would welcome advice and guidance from address NS CIS this venture and would be bayny to clarify further any point which may have been raided to this dispatet: but not fully answered Rorvey G. PAEMRICE **”
“ΦΡΑΧΤΗΣΝT O F JU STICE EMERAL B UREAU OF INV ES ☆☆ In Reply, Ple ase Ref er to File No. UNITED STATE S DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FED ERAL BU REAU OF INVES TIGAT ION Ja ckson , Mississippi 39205 March 28, 1”
“ΦΡΑΧΤΗΣΝT O F JU STICE EMERAL B UREAU OF INV ES ☆☆ In Reply, Ple ase Ref er to File No. UNITED STATE S DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FED ERAL BU REAU OF INVES TIGAT ION Ja ckson , Mississippi 39205 March 28, 1”
“another request supplying further data. This time the request was reduced to $43,500. This request was also rejected by the DD/P. .CEOPET CLULL Security Information”
“to Swider? 24 i: Mr. Shaw. I would normally have seen copies of contact 43 reports which were reports that we wrote -- any of us who were ■C-PDET ALDERSON REPORTING COMPANY NW 50955 DocId: 32277214 Page 15”