“22 i ii I have never seen what is in their files — my assumption is 73 that they have files only on Agency personnel. I cannot 24 visualize circumstances under which they would maintain infor-! 15 : mation on people who are not in the Agency or who had not been; NW 48331 D”
“the Agency's official liaison with the National Archives and Records Administration and its Office of the Federal Register, with the Information Security Oversight Office, and with any other entities on any matters within the responsibility or authority of the Director of In”
“resolve the disposition of these documents and so inform the requester without further delay. Attached are five documents from our files which originated with your Agency. Please examine these documents and if classified, determine if classification is to be maintained. If ”
“d correspondence and certain unclassified correspondence exchanged between this Agency and the HSCA. 2. The HSCA has indicated its desire that copies of these three categories of material be held in sealed and segregated storage to ensure the preservation of all relevant records ”
“documents which are included in this appeal package. 3. (U) Recommendat ions: a. Tab A-1 contains nine overt documents that I recommend be released to Ms. Barnes in toto. b. Tab B contains the DDO documents that were considered in this appeal case. The Appeal Review Form at”
“maintain the integrity of each envelope below E7E so that interested parties may know what was and was not DJ 15 MO P3 reviewed by HSCA staff members. 53 3. In some instances, the above files contain material marked in the lower right-hand corner with a green circular dot. ”
“agent (b) (7) (j)(l)(b) ( ) FBI file number (b)(2) • O)(D(b): ( ) Privacy of other individual (b)(6) . (5) (D (O ‘ (-)' Does not pertain to request K/A . "Exempted portions ‘ are not relevant . to the requester". ( ) Information from another Government agency (b) (1) (j)(l)”
“14-00000 SECEL set the -3 - c. Tab C contains the identification of nine FBI documents that were surfaced during the appeal search. I recommend this list be referred to the FBI for their action. d. Tab DD contains d. Tab contains a document that originated with the D”
“element. Particularly ino that sheds some unfavorable public ty toward Agency. 13. 14. We lion Tom Ni i D. Wen Contone - Joni -al 7 u nd ys RiSOge:justyes file this inclahiryscy. me have Shall 201D -file? 15. FOIA X10 rEwouS 0IU UstEDITION INTERNAL 3-62 SECRET CON”
“internal Agency investigation of this disclosure and the - White House was satisfied that no Agency employee was the source. Attachment 384 Hand Colvin y' e ■ Ananbo71rz "T.Y... RMY ' ADnilalolnhinLieluut.‘N2E JOL Citi 00067 A.”
“C). 4. Mr. Bill Ashbaugh of OGC has concurred in these •recommendations. Attachments: Laws J. Duke DDO Appeals Officer Tab A = References A-C Tab B = Documents B1,B2,B3,B5, and 66 Tab C = NIS & FBI Referral Letters i CONFIDENTIAL When -3- Retached From Attachments”
“There has been no response to this request although it has been made both in writing and orally. 2. The Memorandum of Understanding with the Committee provides that the Committee will notify the DCI in writing of its desire to disclose any information designated for protection by”
“OBSERVATIONS: Contact this date with Department officials elicited that four Department attorneys, including K. William O'Connor, Special Counsel for Intelligence Coordination, Office of Deputy Attorney General, have reviewed the above 693-page document and have/ furnished ”
“suY DLVACI 6 11 the current policy was then. A What I have been told since by those who should know is 3 that there was no policy as set forth here. 4 Mr. Goldsmith. Do you know what the criteria were for 5 selecting the 117 individuals whose files were reviewed? 6 Mr. T”
“these exhibits will be made available as soon as approvals are obtained. Certain names are deleted in the exhibits due to privacy considerations. JAN We arc attempting to identify Items 1, 2, 3, and 4, of the examples cited in the attachment to your March 19th letter. When i”
“fact, the Deputy Director of Security was the denying official of document 4 and Chief, Services Staff for documents 1, 2, 3, 5, and 6. OGC should point out and correct this error in their letter to requester).. d. In an undated letter received by CIA on 26 April 1976, Ms. ”
“action an identification list of nine additional FBI reports that were located 1 during the appeal review, g. Refer one document located during the appeal review, to the Department of the Army for their action. CONFIDENTIAL WhSR Detached From i Attachments - SECRET ‘PDc”
“Board. If the Joint Resolution did not pass, we would have a head start on reviewing the documents. NW 65990 Docld:32404136 Page 2 ADMINISTRATIVE INTERNAL USE ONLY ADMINISTRATIVE INTERNAL USE ONLY SUBJECT: Request for Access to HSCA Records 3. I then informed Mr. O'Neil that the ”
“13-00000 cIED CONFIDENTIAL SECRET TOP SECRET APPEALS REVIEW' FORM Tab:328 contains Brence Slow for DCI ( ) Previously denied in toto under exemption(s) dated 25 apst 1968 of ( ) Segregable portions previously released; excised portions exempted under of 0 Located durin”
“the Board’s decisions to uphold any of our determinations that certain information meets the criteria for postponement of release. Additionally, as you know, there are FOIA litigations for this same material. Plaintiff's counsel has indicated in court pleadings and orally tha”
“14-00000 DLNLT 17 November 1976 MEMORANDUM FOR: Chairman, Information Review Committee ATTENTION Mr. H. G. Bean, Assistant for Information SUBJECT FOIA Appeal--Elaine Fuller (75-4057) 1REFERENCES A. Initial Request dated 22 July 1975." B. IPS Reply dated 19 March 1976. ”
“13-00000 - : APPEALS REVIEW FORM we 320 say 15 3-51 contain5 DISPATCH UFGA-29884 dated 11 April 1968 but not sent Drepuester by IPS ) Previously denied in toto under exemption(s) of Recommended KL 5 under Segregable portions previouslyyreleases; excised portions exempte”
“being withdrawn. The Judge Tunheim also agreed yesterday that since the EXDIR had agreed to sign the declaration that there will no longer be a need for the critical language in their report on this issue. James R. Oliver CC: Edmund Cohen@DA R. Bruce Burke@DCI Sent on 24 ”
“11. DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION (Circle if appropriate) (30 CHARACTERS) CABLE 2 DISPATCH MEMO REPOR T FO RM LETTER AIRGRAM FROM/ORIGI NÁTOR 130 CHARACTERS) 3 Listing TO/RE CIPIENT (30 CH ARACTERS) CLASS WHERE LOCATED (10 CHARACTERS) REFERRED BY (10 CHARACTERS) DDO 1 DO FILE NUMBER 1 20 ”
“will send additional persons to be granted clearances. As to access to compartmentalized information, those members of the staff who will be designated will be indicated to you in subsequent communications. . With best wishes. William G. Miller William G. Miller Enclo”
“14-00000 C. torepe Division determined that it ten s also necessary to protect somices : n methods: The sour is currently active, fib aeess to informal ion in the document abort the Fecol . secority sari ice wa • stif r iicnt!, 1 • "it e! : not current disclosure of that i”
“September). If the Board rejects the staff's recommendation, then we have the option of appealing to the President. Marwell and Gunn seemed confident that. - the Board would agree to delay the release. 3. Gunn requested that the Agency's additional evidence on these four ite”
“13-00000 APPEALS REVIEW FORM -5.68 330 9 29 April 1968 DISPATCH OEPA-,1097 dated Watte (2)0) (DXI), (DV3) (DX6) “contains ), ) Previously denied in toto unde 2) Of, FOIA ) Segregable portions previously released; excised portions exempted under of ) Located during ”
“n, although you may wish to get the concurrence of the OLC who now is responsible for this material. E2 IMPDET CL BY 012860 NW 65990 Docld:32393441 Page 2 SECRET ] SECRET -.2 - 4. Briefly, to recapitulate, while an extensive review of the Church Committee report may show certain ”
“14-00000 -tXt"*3akat s wiv taa -dr aas lai This document must be denied to protect the former deep cover asset, AMCHEER/1. This document is denied under (h)(1) proper classification, (b)(3) protection of sources and methods and (b) (6) protection of the privacy of othe”
“the estimated time of arrival so that he or someone from his office can be available. He also stated that if delivery was desired to a specific staff member, Mr. Marshall would try and have such person available, but stated he was authorized to accept documents for members of”
“in response to a specific request by the HSCA (Category la and lb). 4 NW 65990 Docld:32390207 Page 2 3. Upon completion of the task of photographing the Category la and 1b documents, those photographic copies (Category 1), the HSCA- generated materials based upon Agency material ”
“ICIPATED THOT HADY HORE SUCH PERSONEL WILL BE CONTACTED. THE FBI NAS FLED GE D FULL C OOPERATIO N WI TH THE COMMITT EE AN D UC WISK TO ASSIST AND FACILITATE ANY INVESTIGATIONS UN DER- TAKEN BY TH E COMM ITTEE WITH RESPECT TO THE FOI. HOWEVER, WE DO KAVE AN OBLIGATION T O IN SURE ”
“13-00000 0.1Tt* CENSYNNE 0Mq 9299 - ih • ‘5. We are also providing you as attachments B, C and D copies of memoranda from EUR, AF and EA Divisions which provides additional background on division attitudes and caveats concerning the provision of this material to the Sele”
“shed for forwarding to Mr. James A. Wilderotter, Associate Co unsel to the President. Enclosure s (4 ) 62-116395 1 The Deputy Attorney General Attention: Michael E. Shaheen, Jr. Special Counsel for Intelligence Coordination DELIVERED TO TEXTO IA-DE-VE PUR/AD -r) mf Assoc. Dir. De”
“shed for forwarding to Mr. James A. Wilderotter, Associate Co unsel to the President. Enclosure s (4 ) 62-116395 1 The Deputy Attorney General Attention: Michael E. Shaheen, Jr. Special Counsel for Intelligence Coordination DELIVERED TO TEXTO IA-DE-VE PUR/AD -r) mf Assoc. Dir. De”
“probably went to other places in Washington as well. Q: This particular information was disseminated to other agencies without a request of any such agency. Is that correct? A: Yes. Q: This fit into the other category of cases where disseminations were made? A: Dissemina”
“would in no way mitigate his desire to be of service to the Agency../ CEADET Security Information 07444 J”
“ifiably invaded should the information be released. k. Identities of U.S. law enforcement officials. 6. I cannot guarantee that the OGC sterilizations, following guidelines described in the attached memorandum, are generally as minimal as you may want. As you can see, this proces”
“ot for diss emi nation outside your Committee. I ts u se is limite d to offi cia' proceedings by yo ur Committee and the content may not be disclosed to unauthorized person Tel without the express approval of the FBI NW 65994 Docld:32989616 Page 1 5 Response to SSC request, App”
“the other agency(ies). 9 Page(s) withheld for the following reason(s): For your information: % The following number is to be used for reference regarding these pages: 65-6165-25,26 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX X DELETED PAGE(S) X XXXXXX X NO DUPLICATION FEE X XXXXXX X FOR TH”
“B Res ponse to SSC request, Appen dix C, Part I, Item number 9. Tab C Unexcised version of documents furnished to SSC in response to request in Appendix C, Part I, Item number 6. Tab D - Unexcised version of documents furnished to SSC in response to request in Appendix C, Part I,”
“proposals, CIA is i willing to work with the Board to reach another mutually agreeable solution. We strongly believe, however, that any I approach which suggests that the U.S. Government may ignore its |obligations and commitments to foreign governments would seriously under”
“promulgation of Executive Orders 11905 and 12036 there have been limitations on reporting on U.S. persons, which may affect past practice. However, this office is not in a position to provide an Agency position on this issue. 3. It is requested that you coordinate with the ”
“2000079”, APPEALS REVIEW FORM ab2-75 contains MEMO B-191 dated- 9 Oct. 1968 % Previously denied in toto under exemption(s (b)()(LiaisoN) (D)3DE FOIA -) )Segregable portions previously released; excised portions exempted under / of -----------------------------------------”
“14-00000 sicwal CENTER A.. sec seed L’L. Pace t.o i : are vaces TEL a □ 0 o 0 0 3 CAS-C-now —s-E CRET.. ESParCm Nowase . =ese5* LavpiRG so-catde B4tc.vwe awoue TELEPOUCH BD-1335 owoe o souen O acruan to E 2 IMPDET o-* CL BY: 1> FURTHER DEFINITION WAS NOT PRACT”
“agencies, and to thone sraior officials of the member a; ac.ca who met ect upon the information. However, unicas sp in ecrordance with paragraph 8 of DCID 197, it may be released to there compo-erta of t’n dencrinerts and agencies of the €7. S. Gu91 mrtinipiting in th producti”
“13-00000; 5 APPEALS’ REVIEW FORM 333 agA 9-55 4 1 contains MEMO B-173 Tab. RecommendeN/ATT. ( ) Previously denied in toto under 0 Segregable CX d For(Newsnotpaper fitFOIA 19 Septntor1968 sent Preque of excised portions exempted portions previously/released; of by”
“sequestered collection, and that copies of the material which were inadvertently destroyed were. previously provided to the HSAC and ARB (or special task force) before their destruction in 1995. 4. (AIUO) With the assistance of HRG, the OIG/IMO has been able to reconstruct t”
“that other field offices have working- level contact with the CIA offices in their territor ie s. If the Director desires, similar instructions will be issued to them. ACTION: (1) Attached for approval is a letter to WFO instructing that all future contacts with CIA are to be han”