“felt Fedoseev’s remarks were equivalent to blackmail and that in order for him to get an extension on his visa it would be necessary for him to slant his articles in favor of the Soviet Union. Fedoseev denied this intent and stated only that they desired the articles to be wr”
“3Y100 VUM.39-JN Alia C Ee D etee 1 8 ? ) 5 3 .. . ported" yesterday, a Soviet called: LltAmerican Ambassa- :„Embassy messenger brought a dorr Foy Rodler and charged message to. the State Depart- the Unitad-IStatis with..in- 5ment asking for information percussabletacts. in”
“said he pointed out to BOBRAKOV the unusual situation in which the United States and the . . Soviet Union find themselves on the same side at the U. E.: Security Council, endeavoring to koep tho peace. SCALE pointed out to BOBRAKOV that this seems to him to be a rather histo”
“again attempted to reach FEDOSEEV and was told by SMIRNOVSKY that he was not in the Embassy. JAFFE said this call did not pertain to the Chinese proposal but to a drawing published in the end of the March issue of the "Red Star” of the "H Bomb.” (5) -9 - NW 88326 Docld:32989”
“--------- _* ‘Mr. Nosenko. Here I do not see what I have seen. But this you receive from the Soviet Government, and if you think 25 you received the true things, what was in file, you are wrong, j OF SFOnr, NlPA II NW 50955 DocId: 32277209 Page 23-”
“Ject ‘a office cn 0 Secembar, while Sub_ect‘& i/a cn con were prevent, the Soviet asked whar. he could 2 lunch : eco, Cr d the - •’ put him off tilliny Prikhodko to 012 hexa cek./Comnar.t: ihoako aid not call/. “CCIMCALSX-Yan AlXX2d XXaXXXXX t Cr. 8 Jec rber. : r.ac called j”
“dispute. The exchange reflected the obdurate, somewhat dogmatic. character of KORN 1/1 characterised IUXHIM: as possesing very " strong and fixed ideas. KORNS did not appear to be awed by XASARESEV1s . position and spoke openly and forcefully to him. Upon departing :/1 spoke ”
“SEUNET 11110761 Kostifor case on line wox foli con- versation ensuing in familiar foron to Kos: Torque ne for arriving late Mur: Did Kos: yes yourecover the suit case? sir: fer offer trip? it was arriving on the Kos: Jes mir: l called to tell you the fol. rowing, tha”
“Schroeder that there was a strong likelihood that the R.I.S. and/or Bulgarian service would make an approach to him during his forthcoming visit to Sofia. An approach in Bulgaria would give the Savo an opportunity for disavowal and also would provide the proper setting for ma”
“9 41 HY 65-15026. a - i In addition to information bet worth .f. £2 enclosed letterhead memorandum, dafre advlsvd that: -3: CBS is making a motion picture 211m of MIKOYAN’S . • t • visit to tna US which will do alven to MIkoTON. This (c) is an effort on the part of 03”
“WFO 105-52614 . ■ asked SCALX and WATSON whether they owned stock, and in the ensuing conversation, SCALI remarked that he would like to . buy some stock in Soviet industries, but only in those indus- S , tries in which the profit motive is now being introduced. ■ ■ BOBRAKO”
“ARE COMMON IN USSR, BUT SOVIET ESTABLISHMENT IS SECURELY SHIELDED NOT ONLY FROM FALSE CHARGES BUT ALSO FROM LEGITIMATE INVESTIGATION OF REAL ABUSES OF POWER...FOR EXAMPLE...ABORTIVE ATTEMPT BY PROSECUTOR IN GEORGIAN REPUBLIC TO GET PERMISSION TO SEARCH APARTMENT AND INTERPA- ”
“case against Tad SZULC as a foreign agent is weak. However, his most recent activities are entirely consonant with the view that he has already served the Soviets well and can 8 PT CLUML : ywe*-*/**"”
“milfomy ninaion which ig this thar was operating . curlorirely in Yugoslavia : Essuver, be uss interested in seogorting . :89500 -Minttroft against the floxiste and the Commintse. Hemegnerted oritohe” oporminsion and and from Whakinger but no word une furthering for "several ”
“friend of yours..." Subj said: "Forgot it." ... 4. Subj asked tho c.o. - "did I do wrong?" To C.o. replied that Sub had Sano besutifully- but he has to expect that the Sovs will keep up all kinds of .. -pressures subtle, small, or even great, and not so subtle. But the way is”
“brought about the compromise of POFOV. (ii) Remarks As stated in Part VIII. B.6., the CHEREPANOV incident was a KGB provocation against the U.S. Embassy, but it is conceivable that statements suggesting the contrary could have been made ad t. TO? OL:”
“4-00000 91 Co zhtoh tn rel c; in: n a worid-uide basis had teen incited, t’n ct’:: gey cm, Cl: ? iporarko. Subject ‘a former Sbrict C/o in * him at the Betel National. Subject deliberately Kept1 7: /to -i tra sechiporano would find it difficult to home private zer hir. re”
“13-00000 22 March 1951 QKSTAIR reported that it was considering breaking off association with DIMITROV because he had become too unpopular and dictatorial and self important. There were also indications of serious misappropriation of funds (NB: This charge was later prove”
“been the initial step in what the KGB hoped would become successful operation. The above theory has been rejected since there are a number of factors which militate against it. These factors incir.de the fact that 0001256 7 SFODET OLvnLI gangs”
“13-00000 J *• 6 i t********hk**-/*-497/406-4X906H U.S.S.R. Subject: ANDROPOV, GRECHKO AND GROMYKO AS MEMBERS OF THE POLITBURO 1. Many Soviet personalities, close to Government circles, are of the opinion that ANDROPOV’S, GRECHKO’s and GROMYKO’s inclusion in the Pol”
“had never done. They were simply forced to give the evidence which was needed by the investigators. The secret letters on the cult of Stalin and much that I heard inthe KGB about the reign of Stalin, all this left its mark and forced me to think deeply about the real truth ”
“myself for what I have done. But, but, take the press bulletin, the communique of the Summit Conference in Moscow on various questions. Again lies, lies, lies, to show that we have had great successes. I can’t see them [the successes). No, excuse me, I know somewhat more tha”
“from Gennadiy GRYAZNOV that an attempt had been made by the KGB to recruit an 0001087 9 SCOP 1 SnuntI”
“National Committee) followers would defect - to him. He said that Dimitrov is on the United States payroll and had called him a traitor to Bulgaria last week. wo nd"ig.\aee CEr 201-45145”
“Cr33%*bnw 4 1 wa wle ft J 4 3445 -69312, •13403 W 0 1 Af *1 0 X % 4 .8. NA 4 1.CT 04 v Sn. 01,dzs 217 9c The himecwty Eri / 4-7 240 13 ’ “, 8 Ak *% 1 I- ate t It $ 783 1 I- W* A } % 77 J *7 1 7. Y + /‘ •a6 I; / ■ 1% 830 NSA CI •1*4 j. swt 1 1 keRce ”
“between.Mr. confrontation was taking place Nosenko and. the “Soviet Em is Washington at the request of bassy official,took place in the the Soviet. Embassy, but no headquarters or the Washing- other details were made public, ton tield- otfice..of‘_the Im- The department, sa”
“ji Les/ine, and acted why. Loginov said that n: jl c., if . biject has. the o’er ce, he coon Icorn the nan. nan)j of " the director of the CI. in lerice. " Subject dole je inor ‘6 19° (e. erany to think subject could get thit Inform. ticn. Chet Ipiren rer. Rsbedlin krecdn whet”
“which SEREBRENNIKOV would be "felt out" as a ,. prospective collaborator with the KGB. The meeting took place, but the brother told the KGB that he had had no .%’„7B opportunity to discuss with SEREBRENNIKOV the possibility of his helping the Soviet Union. SEREBRENNIKOV was i”
“cceasion arise, Isenko case was, discussed was: ,Moscow dispatches said not known t _.. ]”
“his Sovlet friends, Nechiporenko said that he- would ce coming back to lexico nact year." . . 1 "‘One day while Nechiporanko uus in the hotel room, the phone rang and Subject : picked up the phone. . female voice asked for "Givy." Subject Banteringly replied’ ‘ in Russian tha”
“indicated about June 1961, and information from GOLITSYN, based on remarks by KOVSHUK to him, had been interpreted as indicating the 21 0001181”
“didn't understand what KOZLOV was saying. GRIBANOV thought that I, myself, wanted to make the approach to LUNT. KOZLOV got confused on the phone. GRIBANOV asked to speak to me. I took the phone. What are you doing?’ he said. 'You are not at home, you are abroad. You were sen”
“with his superiors in Moscow. .And nowP: he would have to consult with Moscow to see whether Subj can attend the travel agent . conference. Subj asked archly "By letter? Prikhodko replied "You’re crazy- ....... everything goes by cable." Subj stated "You can refuse me a visa."”
“TL86-L. OSLCFF.G. Box 6225 ,/ malmAs , sum yianG moanarksQmLt, sovtre orrxsan. h thy:CONSULARCIvt 92th tins ergy’e. xt. 4AMeL39Y U.S.A-R-lnvrlers A RUSMAN 0 " his ie-to intern you of recinto sinem. i.al-lrof-ot-Cux-d-ca-y 7 % telmabussy ge the dovies as allixe” v-’e ”
“the preceding day.. wre preceding dav*^* - * • • P. .P. 23 There in the presence of United / They Soviet delegation "an- States officials. 49 * y - . nounced Mr. Ncsenko’s disap- .The : State - Department . an- pearance Feb: Ainej.," do nounced at.the time that the The * mee”
“Struggle in Rucsia".- We analyze how the power struggle between Kosygin and Brezhnev is known through the stands taken by the Bunsian- papers "Izvostia" and "Pravda", respectively the organs of the government and of the Communist Party. The Prime Minister’s s’and consists o”
“"research." SUMMATION The case against Tad SZULC as a foreign agent is weak. However, his most recent activities are entirely consonant with the view that he has already served the Soviets well and can 8 StomET”
“was busy through Christmas, ": : : but could possibly see him after Christmas and before. New Years. :• Jew’S. ThenC/O asked Subj if he had inquired of Loginov why the latter was asking ynee such questions. Subf said 'he did not, even though he was completely puzzled - - . -d b”
“13-00000 October 1946 DIMITROV arrested by the police. He believes the reason he was not exe cuted was that the communists wanted to use him as a witness against Nikola PETKOV. 104 CAGWU, dated 4 October 1950; Memorandum for the record, 9.5.51”
“about 11 o’clock, during on the period of student riots, LOGINOV come to the Commercial Office with MITOPOSSK (AEMIDRIFF was there watching wV). They got "some" rifles - AEMIDRIFF could not see how cany or what kind. They took theo cut in some sort of bags. The next morning”
“14-00000 8 E CHBT -2- 1.4. I then asked him how the purchase of the watches was coming along. He told mo that the morning after our. *"blast meeting (this would - have been on 10 September, a Saturday) at about 0930 he went to the Trade Delegation buildingand asked €. fo”
“that he has enough 10 fluence AR VAINS/1 to get a job like this taken care of. Also, poppe 17 10 1- added and related to brania itt a latin, it will raise PAINS/1 to high level of asteen in hoscow. 이. live failed to mention that, at one pilot in the talk VACCINA said he took GULU”
“" 11110533 UCT. 1966 INTERROGATION ENDED P. 20 SOVIET OFFICIALS CLAIMED N. IS DEFECTION CAUSED SEVERE DAMAGE TO KCB, PROMPTED EXPULSION AND DISGRACE OF NUMEROUS SENIOR KOB PERSONNEL CAUSED RECALL OF PERSONNEL FROM ABROAD ) SUSPENSION OF OPERATIONS IN UIS 59 DESPITE HIS C”
“% 2. and that his "maybe” tas just a way of Joshing Loginov. Sudj then assorted tor the C/0 that he felt strong in hie capacity to deal with the Sonlets, and that his joking remarks in now way vitiated that strength. / X The C/0 brought up the matter of Subj’a having told L”
“14-00000 The reminded Subj of what he basically was in Soviet eyes - an torn urepcan refugee’and a Jow. And more, he had never professed to them any ideological sympathy to the Communist cause. The most he had done was to declare that the Soviets represented the wave of the ”
“/ 2. The following day, 14 4/e, Loginov earo to Subj’a office. He anked Subj how- hia- trip (to Europe) hod been and arecifically naked if Subj had seen Cinetto 1 Palccei Porter. Subj replied that he had found out that Ginetto and hor husband were vacationing in Italy. -. L”
“about some trivial matter and wanted to talk to ambassador BAZAROV. AMan on Duty told him that .BAZARCV was taking his . Ci - terncon rest and was not to be bothered. But SEPAKEVICS ocrsisted in his dosire to to BAPARO7. Finally BA2. R0V tool: the phone and”
“the Charge; and Eduard Anatolyevich SARATOV, TASS representative. For cover S ECR E T 111.712”
“et Union. On 17 November OLTMANS allegedly discussed this business further with GVISHIANI in Geneva. 9. On 23 January 1972 OLTMANS will make another visit to Moscow to discuss making the above mentioned films without the participation of the NOS. At this opportunity OLTMANS will ”
“2 5, \\z." : s. J 1 - Lfa) re the financial gain from associating with them, Sub J said that had fallen from to such an insignificant level that it had no effect in his dealings with them —(Soviets. And he sdld that level would sink even more when the Soviets inaugurate * Ae”