“DEC MAILING NOTICES AND CHECKS. A 2 3. THE FEW PREVIOUS CASES AS NOTED PARA 3 REF WERE HANDLED OAD HOC BASIS WHEN BROUGHT TO JMWAVE ATTENT ION. NO FIRM PAVO POLICY WAS ESTABLISHED. FURTHER, JMWAVE NOT AWARE ANY COMMITMENTS TO DE PEIDENT S BY WOFACT. 4. RE CASE 59 REF, RE”
“secure and not disadvantageous to FJCAPE from either a financial or influence standpoint. HERBERT S. SPAETH KHTXON %”
“andS±af£75.Fol Director will agree to allow Counsel to be present during one Enclosures ST-106 00 mrrems ENDS-sh WOC:ebc (9) 50 APR.A. NW 88296 Dpcld:32989628 Page 136 5 CONTINUED - OVER end 6000”
“ake The resicet. of Suck step was docutiofe cutifoofer weighing all foreters in the wor confetty aud we felt that HEWIRELESS. concluding that the hey to the solution acting in his ocon behalf. t A NW 65924 Docld:32349378 Page 3”
“for sale. On the same day, the application to the CAB for acquisition of SAT under Docket No. 252-64 was withdrawn NW 50955 DocId: 32423532 Page 105”
“MAKE DECISION TO AID GOC. AS USUAL W’S VIEWS WERE reproduction by other than suing office is prohibited. larlesnevesan 1”
“so *vij, then .‘, higieat echelons of the Justice Jepai tesal chould ssprdie my transfer beck to Cl 1 0% agon AS norvible.' ? *-%- i I”
“ed affirmatively but indicated that his position in answering HSCA questions would remain unchanged. NW 66000 Docld:32271380 Page 13”
“ACTION THIS CASE UNTIL ADVISED. MOF DID NOT QUESTION THIS RATIONALE AND PROMISED TO COMPLY. wa Dw 3. PLS IDENTIFY CARE? MENTIONED PARA 2.REF. SECRET * SECRET”
“hat this would not be necessary. He returned our exhibits and told us to consider the matter closed. NW 65990 Docld:32392257 Page 9”
“of e y/ S reports hande toyasewing 1/11/1/200126 th 15 A Demanded 13. si (> Thooah heJ. Thomy case, D.K., d e they gasran AthuR Deride Dec J Ahaol d Till Herri e O.K. Lost frerend 1N 15. Are shoulIsdcable be sufficient is Es otlohoner fal A D 16. report to You”
“matter and sce no need to pursue it further at this time. Mtachatens: John W Paring JCHN 2: STUAY Legislative Counsel Ddtutribution Original - CLC Subject ite 1-Pop 1 - Chief, CI Stall 1 - Chief, SE Division 1 - D. Security n ”a —— • : - CC stoat 1 - OLC Chrome”
“14-00000 BECHET GrTA 2541 8. Paria/LCPIPIT would welcome advice and guidance from address NS CIS this venture and would be bayny to clarify further any point which may have been raided to this dispatet: but not fully answered Rorvey G. PAEMRICE **”
“wiIte Warrend Commission and th Oswal to Mclerge Persating the co- CTA Stery 6”
“that that this case will start moving soon. mnenlntiee”
“meeting and the testimony about its significance on the issue of authorization is discussed in detail in Section 5 (iii), infra. NW 50955 DocId: 32423539 Page 251”
“of the terms of this agreement. 1 Sincerely, 7680 ) CLLLts John s. Warner 7 ; / General Counsel 1 ACKNOWLEDGED DATE >StiaD Daniel fill Behuits dees The Honorable Leon Jaworski t 99 th hit R te verr %owugrariwhe g LAFah”
“E TO BE RETAINED. THOSE NOT INDICATED FOR PETENTION ARE AUTHOR. ZED FOR IMMEDATE DESTRUCTION 4. 141c NW 65990 Docld:32404765 Page 2 ☐ CONTINUED ON SEPARATE PAGE 115-30)”
“he instructed MEROLA at that time to have nothing to do with the matter and he should not handle it. NW 64578 Docld:32332334 Page 3 - 2 -”
“13-00000■ 04/16/97 WED 16:15 FAX 202 724 0457 AKiW Mr. J. Barry Harrelson April 16, 1997 Page 12 Conclusion Please let me know if you have any supplements or corrections. We would very much like to ensure that these matters are handled expeditiously. As always, we appre”
“subject and I have no further information or details concern ing this. Orig - OS/SAG Jaside P. Hayes SE/PCH 1 - SE/SEC 1 - LA/SO 1 - Hayes E2 IMPDET CL BY 017709 3.3(6 SECGET”
“me Section 0.15(b) (7) under your proposed Order. The following is in response to your nemorandum of April”
“ecome Section 0.15(b) (7) under your proposed Order. The following is in response to your nemorandum of Apri”
“ecome Section 0.15(b) (7) under your proposed Order. The following is in response to your nemorandum of Apri”
“reads, I would have or would be opposed to it because 24 it provides an exception with the approval of the versight 25 TAnEDET NW 50955 DocId: 32423513 Page 67”
“the case will be closed. a -5- XR OLUKEI 0rg “982 -NW-88326-Docld:32989Z04 Page 268”
“aPe"hd26 &A 1 the above-mentioned matter was recessed, to reconvene at 2 2-00 o'clock of the same day.) 7 4 5 6 8 3 10 11 10 13 14 ]6 17 18 19 20 21 92 07 24 25 TOP SECRET VARO • PAUL NW 50955 DocId: 32423509 Page 65”
“p.m., the hearing in the 21 above -mentioned matter was concluded.) 22 23 24 © 25 TOP SECRET”
“Approved: 1000 Sent M Per iur Special Agent in Charge NW 88296 Docld:32989574 Page 17 ■”
“- Now, I realize that we have said that our other recommen 22 - dation by implication, would prohibit this, but it is only by 23 implication, I would think. 24 Mr. Maxwell. My sense is that by providing this 25 Mr. Aaron. You kind of create a channel. TAR ERPDET • NW 50”
“it, say by next Tuesday or so. in event we do not have a reply to Mr. r. Toomey cable by that date. : 03 Criginal & cc: Mr. Harvey for ZRGRACE File cc: 201-282337 (Mitchell 201) 2 cc: C/S, SRS, Mr. J D. Noell NW 65987 Docld:32411536 Page 4”
“No, I told that there was opinion of P f a 00IjuY HXXeSE OTA fas. “A, he # h BSA aC NW 50955 DocId: 32277209 Page • Oveyorryey -senn-nt-restth-o-TTy-A an FA verprMMS *****0772-90-79638”
“m responding to the above request. It is requested that y ou furnish a copy of th e enclosed memo ra ndum to the HSCA. Enclosures (2) 62-117290 " RRCB:pm (7) GITAL Assoc. Dir. Dep.”
“Philadelphia in order that Boston may submits /FD-128.- .-2- NW 88321 Docld:32989545.Page 27”
“pertaining to him has not been feasible." w N /s e 3. (U) Recommendations: See Tabs 12-4S. ig "d s p 4. (U) This memorandum has as yet not been coordinated XX with Mr. Zicbell of the Office of the General Counsel. is q p z g riyalA Winthrop W. Brown (C) -e v ”
“ARAMETERS OF INTERIEW OR PRI VILEGED AREAS. THE CONSULTANT DID NOT ACT AS A LEGAL ADVISOR. EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY, BUREAU WILL NO LON GE R PR O VI DE NW 65994 Docl d:32989794 Page 11 P”
“14-00000‘ % A m a o i itis U & 6 2. Thank you for your response So this case. Ye would appreciate any additional data you can provide ca (c) above and we will try to keep you advised of further interest in leads which you forward. JAES R. MULTAY .LICrant/L= 1 cc”
“already have adequate - contractual authority. -. '• ’: /&, & S.comen Charles W. Sandman Concur: Date: . Vs/, John A. Risso g.FES 1970 Office of General Counsel Distribution: Orig & 1 - Addressee 1 - OGC/OSMLD SECRET E2 IMPDET 26 OP/CPD. CL BY: 063837”
“have had previous DCts who have testified that you 24 should not have tln ■ in rf the PAT from the agency but 25 i thia t ad based upon »•!.•• animation as they then knew it. 1O9 SECRET rearm n PAUL NW 50955 DocId: 32423509 Page 36”
“cestenge case or cases. There is merit to this contention by 2 w oronre”
“(i1i< partnor) owns Perla Appliance E *‘M1. Renica DTA. (close siitms. ldy ‘: * : SECTION XVI MISCELLANEOUS DATE SIGNATURE 11972 5”
“matter and see no need to pursue it further at this time. Attachment: Sohn Tins Tarwag JCHN kb MAURY Legislative Counsel Plutribetion: Original - CLC Subject ehe 1.20? 1 - Chief, Ci State 1 - Chief, SB Division 1 - D Security * - EG 1 - OLC Chroco EGRET so”
“granted no 4/2 . both in the order and our proposed statute, particularly in the area of requirements. ' 24 it‘s import ant to haze this caveat, if vou il 1. oR Now recommendation 1 : really suggests that- the oversight TOP SECRET v**D A AUL NW 50955 DocId:32423509 ”
“could consider releasing them. He suggested that we secure s atements admissible in United 2000983 Classification, a —x ,6 GJo otter. 10 V’d Less - % idtv derivation: ziW 4 NW 48327 DocId:32263889 Page 333”
“station by the - - ADSO, this contract will be deemed to have been amended to the extent of such change. 3”
“ect in the CAVBOMB case. He asked LAPORIS how the business was coming, and he replied that they were NW 65994 Docld:32292137 Page 3 2 CV 157-127 :”
“disposition. Please direct any further inquiries regarding this matter to W. Curtis Chaloner at 40552 (secure). W. Curtis Chaloner for John K. Reilly FOR—OFFICIAL USE ONLY”
“stand that we would not use hin and expressed his regret. The conversation ended on a friendly note. TJF/par NW 65987 Docld:32414109 Page 2 03 QUA パン nomas J. Flores w/111/10 1.44”
“files referring to this matter will exist. We believe this operation secure and not disadvantageous to FJCAPE from Spaeth either a financial or influence standpoint. Cue”
“FORCING CABEZA TO TEST IFY IN MANNER AIDING GROUP’S POSITION. 3. BASED ON REVIEW AND DISCUSSIONS WITH STATION PERSONNEL FAMILIAR CABEZA ACT IVH IES, VE SHOULD PROBABLY EXPECT CABEZA TO USE WOFIRM AS WHIPPING BOY OR EMINENCE GRISE" BEHIND eseply CS copy M 100-9-16 in File20”