“r. DULLES then suggested that the res- ponse to this qu estion could be in the form of sw orn testim ony before the Commission by a senior CIA official or a letter or affidavit. He re- called that the Director of the FBI had replied by letter to a similar question. In any event, ”
“C entral Int elligence Agency.. 11 SCORET NW 65924 D ocld:32 357059 Page 2 L - 2 10 February 1964 Le tter to Mr. Richard HELMS, Deputy Director for Plans, dated 10 February 1964, from J. Lee RANKIN, General Counsel. "This will acknowledge with the thanks of the Commission your me”
“m for Winston m. SCOTT, dated 13 October 1966; Subject: Lee Harvey OSWALD. 2. Note, undated, regardi ng contacts of ALFEREV. 3. Memorandum for A rant Deputy Director, Plans, dated 23 Novembe r gontact 1963 Bl ack of Lee OSWALD with a member of sovet KGB KORA Assass ination Depar”
“ice. I would ap- preciate your assistance in sending copies of th ese reports or other materials t o the Commission as soon. as possible. "In addition, I would like your Agency to supply the Commission with a report on the information in your possession regarding Lee Harvey OSWAL”
“21 ITE M IS RESTRICTED 104-10406-10113 V OL UME II Pages 0001874 0002071 Copy 8 HELMS Hearing SECRET NW 65990 Docld:32389862 Page 2 No. 056 S ECRET TA BLE OF CONT ENTS R EPRODUCT ION PROHIBITED 1. Memoran dum for Winston m. SCOTT , dated 13 Oc tober 1966; Subject: Lee Harvey OSWA”
“ret Service. I would ap- preciate your assistance in sending copie s of these reports or other mater ials to the Commission as soon. as possible. "In addition, I would like your Agency to supply the Commission with a report on the information in your possession regarding Lee Harv”
“ion, I would like your Agency to sup ply the Commission with a report on th e information in your po ssession regarding Lee Harvey OSWALD prior to November 22, 1963. Some of this information is pro- vided in the footnote on Page 2 of your report dated January 31, 1964, entitled '”
“IBITED . cgative. Cal enduτι έ a eve fornual Fus hing on de me dling , wordine nesvading ito. Sinre dd A. STERN with WILLENS on this visit & Langley in 201-289245 C001878 REPRODUCTION PROHIBITED NW 65990 Docld:32389862 Page 9 PAGE 5 COPY NO. of 212 SECRET REPRODUCTION PROHIBI”
“the way we handled our data and for that reason placed great emphasis upon what the Commission might be able to do in its report for an improved methodology based on machines among departments and agencies involved in security matters." 13 April 1964 Memorandum for Deputy Directo”
“e OSWALD, Lee Harvey OSWALD'S mother, and the other was Mr. Mark LANE, Mrs. OSWALD's attorney. : One "2. Mr. DULLES then suggested that the res- ponse to this question could be in the form of sworn testimony before the Commission by a senior CIA official or a letter or affidavit.”
“security rating which precludes their delivery to the Commission by the Secret Servi ce. I would ap- preciate your assistance in sending copies of these reports or other materials to the Commission as soon. as possible. "In addition, I would like your Agency to supply the Commiss”
“rday, the 29th) revi ewing proofs. REPRODUCTION PROHIBITED . cgative. Calenduτι έ a eve fornual Fush ing on demedling , wordine nesvading ito. Sin redd A. STERN with WI LL ENS on this vi sit & Langley in 201-289245 C001878 REPRODUCTI ON PROHIBITED NW 65990 Docld:32389862 Page”
“on the information in your possession regarding Lee Harvey OSWALD prior to November 22, 1963. Some o f this information is pro- vided i n the f oo tnote o n Page 2 of your report dated January 31, 1964, entitled 'Information Developed by CIA on the Activity of Lee Harvey OSWALD i”
“ters electrically sent to the Department of the Navy the following message on 24 October 1963: 1963. Subject: Lee Henry (sic - Harvey] OSWALD. Reference is made to GIA OUT Teletype No. 74673, dated 10 October 1963, regarding possible presence of subject in Mexico City. It is re- ”
“second paragr aph og our l etter of February 12, 164, with all indications o f your cinfidential co mmunications tech- niques and confidential sources deleted. You will also afford members of our staff working in this area an opportunity to review the actual files so that they ma”
“as possible. "In addition, I would like your Agenc y to supply the Comm ission with a rep ort on the information in your possession regarding Lee Harvey OSWALD prior to November 22, 1 963. So me of this information is pro- vided in the footnote o n Page 2 o f your report dated Ja”
“to the Central Intelligence Agency.. 11 SCORET NW 65924 Docld:32357059 Page 2 L - 2 10 February 1964 Letter to Mr. Richard HELMS, Deputy Director for Plans, dated 10 February 1964, from J. Lee RANKIN, General Counsel. "This will acknowledge with the thanks of the Commission your ”
“a similar question. In any event, Mr. DULLES felt that the reply should be straight- forwar d and to the point. He thought language which made it clear that Lee Harvey OSWALD was never an employee or agent of CIA would suffice. We should also state that neither CIA nor anyone act”
“riod since Novem- ber 1963. All these materials reportedly carry s NW 65924 Docld:32357059 Page 3 SE CRET 3 AFADFT security rating wh ich pre clude s their delive ry to the Commission by the Secret Service. I would ap- preciate your assistance in sending copies of these reports o”
“reports or other materials to the Commission as soon. as possible. "In ad dition, I wou ld like your Agency to supply the Commission with a report on the information in your possession regarding Lee Harvey OSWALD prior to November 22, 1963. Some of this information is pro- vided ”
“in the course of its in- vestigation, we would like the reports to be furnished to the Central Inte lligence Agency.. 11 SCORET NW 65924 Docld:32357059 Page 2 L - 2 10 February 1964 Letter to Mr. Richard HELMS, Deputy Director for Plans, dated 10 February 1964, from J. Lee RANKIN”
“y Saturday, the 29th) r evi ewing proof s. REPRODUCTION PROHIBITED . cgative. Calenduτι έ a eve f or nual Fushing on demedling , wordine nesvading ito. Sinredd A. STERN with WILLENS on this visit & Langley in 201-289245 C001878 REPRODUCTION PROHIBITED NW 65990 Docld:32389862 ”
“rvices of the intelligence services of other communist st ates at any time prior to 22 November 1 96 3, or was OSWALD solicited by these intelligence services to become such an agent?' . Mr. DULLES and I felt that it would be better to confine our response to a precise statement ”
“on by Lee Harvey OSWALD with persons in the Soviet Uni on, in particular, the letters r eferred to o n page 63 of your Supplemental Report on the Assassination of President Kennedy. "As additional materials in these general areas are developed by the Bureau in the course of its i”
“the Central Inte lligenc e Agency, we discussed the possibility of supplying add itional reports of the Federal Bureau of Investigation to the Central Intelligence Agency in order to enable that agency to be of further assistance to the Commission. It was agreed that F.B.I. repor”
“reportedly carry s NW 65924 Docl d:32357059 Page 3 SECRET 3 AFADFT securi ty rating which pre cludes their delivery to the Commission by the Secret Service. I would ap- preciate your assistance in sending copies of these reports or other materials to the Commission as soon. as po”
“r Goldbery) *Believe Mr. Rocca was at the Commission at least one other day (prob abl y Saturday, th e 29th) revi ewing proofs. REPRODUCTION PROHIBITED . cgative. Calenduτι έ a eve fornual Fushing on demedling , wordine nesvading ito. Sinredd A. STERN with WILLENS on this visi”
“N's Comments on the Kennedy Assassination. [FOIA No. 413-76A] 11. Memorandum for J. Lee RANKIN, date d 5 Ju ne 1964; Subje ct: Allegations Regarding Intelligence Tr aini ng School in Minsk, USSR. [FOIA No. 726-314 ΧΑΑΖ-17620] 12. Memorandum for J. Lee RANKIN, dated 31 March 1964;”
“to be of further assistance to the Commission. It was agree d that F.B.I. rep orts would be made ava il- able to C.I.A. and that representatives of the two agencies would consult regarding the precautions to be taken in the use of these materials. "Accordingly, the Commission wou”
“n the course of the discussion, he viewed the following specific items of orig inal Agency docu- men tation: "a. DIR-74673 dated 18 October 1963 to State, FBI, and Navy reporting contact with Soviet Embassy, Mexico, by American, Lee OSWALD. (Forwarded to Commission under cover of”
“IR-92725, 6 January 1964 [FOIA No. 456-771] 14. Memorandum for J. Lee RANKIN, dated 6 March 1964; Su be jct: Jaf Bation in SA Possession Regarding Lee Harvey EDUCTION B ADDHO Novender 22 , 19 63. [FOIA 590-252 15. Note fr om HELMS LDDOUNDTEd 6 March 1 964 PROHIBITED 16. Memorandu”
“sel. "At the conference held in my office last Thursday, March 12, we agreed to f orward to you cert ain documents. Those documents accompany this letter and they are as follows: "1. Three ring loose-leaf notebook containing a file entitled "Lee Harvey OSWALD and Marina OSWALD, D”
“"Accordingly, the Commission would appreciate your furnishing the C.I.A. (Atte ntion: Mr. Richard HE LMS) copies of the following reports: " "All correspondence carried on by Lee Harvey OSWALD with persons in the Soviet Union, in particular, the letters referred to on page 63 of ”
“ion Records Collection Act of 1992 (44 USC 2107 Note). Case#:NW 65990 Date: 11-01-2021 ITEM IS RESTR ICTED 104-10422-10024 From a review of the Agency's file on Lee Harvey OSWALD, it becomes apparent that the Agency and its field stations, parti- cularly in Mexico City and Miaimi”
“y been forwarded to the Commission. In the co urse of the discussion, he viewed the foll owi ng spec ific items of original Agency docu- mentation: "a. DIR-74673 dated 18 October 1963 to State, FBI, and Navy reporting contact with Soviet Embassy, Mexico, by American, Lee OSWALD. ”
“4 Letter to Mr. Richard HELMS, Deputy Director for Plans, dated 10 February 1964, from J. Lee RANKIN , General Counsel. "This will acknowledge with the thanks of the Commission your memorandum dated January 31, 1964, relating to information developed by your Agency on Lee Harvey ”
“.I. reports would be made avail- a ble to C.I.A. and that representatives of the two age nci es woul d consult regarding the precautions to be taken in the use of these materials. "Accordingly, the Commission would appreciate your furnishing the C.I.A. (Attention: Mr. Richard HEL”
“ion undertaken by your Agency and other concerned agencies into this matter and your evaluation as t o the truth of ALVARADO's assertions. In particular, it would be helpful if a report could be submitted by the expert wgo conducted the poly- graph examination which emphasizes th”
“021 ITEM IS RESTRICTED 104-10406-10113 VOLUME II Pages 0001874 0002071 Copy 8 HELMS Hearing SECRET N W 65990 Docld:32389862 Page 2 No. 056 SECRET TABLE OF CONTENTS REPRODUCTION PROHIBITED 1. Memorandum for Winston m. SCOTT, dated 13 October 1966; Subject: Lee Harvey OSWALD. 2. No”
“course of the discussion, he viewed the following specific items of original Agency docu- mentation: "a. DIR-74673 dated 18 October 1963 to State, FBI, and Navy reporting contact with Soviet Embassy, Mexico, by American, Lee OSWALD. (Forwarded to Commission under cover of DDP mem”
“age 2 of your report dated January 31, 1964, entitled 'Information Developed by CIA on the Ac tivity of Lee Harvey OSWALD in Mexico City 28 September 3 October 1963'. The footnote indicates that until early October of 1963 the con- tents of this file consisted entirely of press m”
“on is pro- vided in the footnote on Page 2 of your report dated January 31, 19 64, entitled 'Info rm ation Developed by CIA on the Activity of Lee Harvey OSWALD in Mexico City 28 September 3 October 1963'. The footnote indicates that until early October of 1963 the con- tents of ”
“ing the C.I.A. (Attention: Mr. Richard HELMS) copies of the following reports: " "All correspondence carried on by Lee Harvey OSWALD with persons in the Soviet Union, in particular, the letters referred to on page 63 of your Supplemental Report on the Assassination of President K”
“dated 6 March 1964; Subejct: Jaf Bation in SA Possession Regarding Lee Harvey EDUCTION BADDHO Novend er 22, 1963. [FOIA 590-252 15. Note from HELMS LDDOUNDTEd 6 March 1964 PROHIBITED 16. Memorandum for Chief, CI/R&A, dated 20 February 1964; Subject: Documents Available in OSWALD'”
“ITEM IS RESTRICTED 104-10422-10024 From a review of the Agency's file on Lee Harvey OSWALD, it beco me s apparent that the Agency and its field stations, parti- cularly in Mexico City and Miaimi, were not unmindful of the possi bility that OSWALD did not act alone. During the fir”
“ated 31 March 1964; Subject: Reports on Activities and Trave l of Lee H arvey OSWALD and Marina Niko levna OSWALD. [FOIA No. 627-821] 13. DIR-92725, 6 January 1964 [FOIA No. 456-771] 14. Memorandum for J. Lee RANKIN, dated 6 March 1964; Subejct: Jaf Bation in SA Possession Regard”
“o State, FBI, and Navy reporting contact with Soviet Embassy, Mexico, by Ameri can, Lee OSWALD. ( Fo rwarded to Commission under cover of DDP memo, No. 4-1554, dated 24 March 1964.) "b. MEXI-7019 (IN-66846) dated 22 November 1963 re photos of unidentified American entering Cuban ”
“S RESTRICTED 104-10406-10113 VOLUME II Pages 0001874 0002071 Copy 8 HELMS Hearing SECRET NW 65990 Do cld:32389862 Page 2 No. 056 SECRET TABLE OF CONTENTS REPRODUCTION PROHIBITED 1. Memorandum for Winston m. SCOTT, dated 13 October 1966; Subject: Lee Harvey OSWALD. 2. Note, undate”
“78 REPRODUCT ION PROHIBITED NW 65990 Docld:32389862 Page 9 PAGE 5 COPY NO. of 212 SECRET REPRODUCTIO N PROHIBITED 5 HAY 1964 Subject-General: Dobriefing s ORGANG-1 Specific: OSHALD CASE REJOGI Roacticing TO ON Konindy assasinateong 7 THE SCURCE DOES NOT HAVE DIEM KOMANCE OF LEE H”
“r to November 22, 1963. Some of this information is pro- vided in the footnote on Page 2 of your rep ort dated January 31, 1964, entitled 'Information Developed by CIA on the Activity of Lee Harvey OSWALD in Mexico City 28 September 3 October 1963'. The footnote indicates that un”