“ouse and the FBI or other agencies under th e ju risdiction of the Attorney General bypass ed the At torney General? To what extent sh ou ld such communications be channeled through the Attorney General? #MOR 16 210-2-00 S P-2ALM/B 14 JUL 17 197 5 ENCLOS URE, NW 6599490 0 Id:3298”
“e House and the FBI or other agencies under th e jurisdiction of the Attorney General bypa ss ed the Attorney General? To what extent sh ould such communications be channeled through the Attorney General? #MOR 16 210-2-00 SP-2ALM/B 14 JUL 17 1 975 ENCL OSURE, NW 65994 900 Id:3298”
“e House and the FBI or other agencies under th e jurisdiction of the Attorney General bypa ss ed the Attorney General? To what extent sh ould such communications be channeled through the Attorney General? #MOR 16 210-2-00 SP-2ALM/B 14 JUL 17 1 975 ENCL OSURE, NW 65994 900 Id:3298”
“ations from the White House to this Bureau, and, short of a file by file review, there is no means o f determining whether or not such communications bypassed the Attorney General. ACTION: RLM β The attached letter be sent to the Attorney General. NW 65994 Docld:32989623 Page 3 w”
“ations from the White House to this Bureau, and, short of a file by file review, there is no means o f determining whether or not such communications bypassed the Attorney General. ACTION: RLM β The attached letter be sent to the Attorney General. NW 65994 Docld:32989623 Page 3 w”
“te House which could be extremely difficult and time consuming. Similarly, there is no cont rol file containing copies of all communications from the White House to this Bureau, and, short of a file by file review, there is no means of determining whether or not such communicatio”
“General? To what extent should such communications be channeled through the Attorney General? #MOR 1 6 210- 2-00 SP-2ALM/B 14 JUL 17 1975 ENCLOSURE, NW 6599490 0 Id:3298 9623 Pa ge4U.S. Sau 1163 Plan IVE on Savings EXP . PROC. 30 JUL17 1975 1 /rm Új-150 Ed. 4-26-65) UNITED STATE”
“General? To what extent should such communications be channeled through the Attorney General? #MOR 1 6 210- 2-00 SP-2ALM/B 14 JUL 17 1975 ENCLOSURE, NW 6599490 0 Id:3298 9623 Pa ge4U.S. Sau 1163 Plan IVE on Savings EXP . PROC. 30 JUL17 1975 1 /rm Új-150 Ed. 4-26-65) UNITED STATE”
“direct operational liaison with the White House Office, for the purposes described in your memorandu m of May 2, 1974. As provided in 28 CFR, 0.15 (b)(7), the Deputy Attorney General will coordinate Departmental liaison with the White House staff and the Executive Office of the P”
“direct operational liaison with the White House Office, for the purposes described in your memorandu m of May 2, 1974. As provided in 28 CFR, 0.15 (b)(7), the Deputy Attorney General will coordinate Departmental liaison with the White House staff and the Executive Office of the P”
“to this Bureau, and, short of a file by file review, there is no me ans of determining whether or no t such communications bypassed the Attorney General. ACTION: RLM β The attached le tter be sent t o the Attorney General. NW 65994 Docld:32989623 Page 3 wuc джа 2 بو TO : FROM : O”
“to this Bureau, and, short of a file by file review, there is no me ans of determining whether or no t such communications bypassed the Attorney General. ACTION: RLM β The attached le tter be sent t o the Attorney General. NW 65994 Docld:32989623 Page 3 wuc джа 2 بو TO : FROM : O”
“te House which could be extremely difficult and time consuming. Similarly, there is no cont rol file containing copies of all communications from the White House to this Bureau, and, short of a file by file review, there is no means of determining whether or not such communicatio”
“te House which could be extremely difficult and time consuming. Similarly, there is no cont rol file containing copies of all communications from the White House to this Bureau, and, short of a file by file review, there is no means of determining whether or not such communicatio”
“To what extent should such c ommunications be channeled through the Attorney General? #MOR 16 210-2- 00 SP-2ALM/B 14 J UL 17 1975 ENCLOSURE, NW 65994900 Id:329896 23 Page 4U.S. Sau 1163 Pl an IVE on Sa vings EXP. PROC. 30 J UL17 19 75 1 /rm Új-150 Ed. 4-26-65) UNITED STATES OVER”
“possibly be pertinent to number 5 . If no t, I see no reason to mention it." In this Bureau's ; rep ly to the Department, copy attached, dated 5/2/74 captioned "Revision of the Department of Justice Organization Regulations (28 CFR Part 0)" in which the need for Bureau operationa”
“possibly be pertinent to number 5 . If no t, I see no reason to mention it." In this Bureau's ; rep ly to the Department, copy attached, dated 5/2/74 captioned "Revision of the Department of Justice Organization Regulations (28 CFR Part 0)" in which the need for Bureau operationa”
“L 31 1975 E nc losures (7) - Sant 7-29-8 5 84 JUL 3 1 1975 ENCLOSURE NW 65994 Docfd:3298962 3 Page 2 Memorandum to Mr. W. R. Wannall Re: UNITED STATES SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE TO STUDY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS WITH RESPECT TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES While our current policy is to s”
“L 31 1975 E nc losures (7) - Sant 7-29-8 5 84 JUL 3 1 1975 ENCLOSURE NW 65994 Docfd:3298962 3 Page 2 Memorandum to Mr. W. R. Wannall Re: UNITED STATES SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE TO STUDY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS WITH RESPECT TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES While our current policy is to s”
“possibly be pertinent to number 5 . If no t, I see no reason to mention it." In this Bureau's ; rep ly to the Department, copy attached, dated 5/2/74 captioned "Revision of the Department of Justice Organization Regulations (28 CFR Part 0)" in which the need for Bureau operationa”
“L 31 1975 E nc losures (7) - Sant 7-29-8 5 84 JUL 3 1 1975 ENCLOSURE NW 65994 Docfd:3298962 3 Page 2 Memorandum to Mr. W. R. Wannall Re: UNITED STATES SENATE SELECT COMMITTEE TO STUDY GOVERNMENTAL OPERATIONS WITH RESPECT TO INTELLIGENCE ACTIVITIES While our current policy is to s”
“ations from the White House to this Bureau, and, short of a file by file review, there is no means o f determining whether or not such communications bypassed the Attorney General. ACTION: RLM β The attached letter be sent to the Attorney General. NW 65994 Docld:32989623 Page 3 w”
“to this Bureau, and, short of a file by file review, there is no me ans of determining whether or no t such communications bypassed the Attorney General. ACTION: RLM β The attached le tter be sent t o the Attorney General. NW 65994 Docld:32989623 Page 3 wuc джа 2 بو TO : FROM : O”
“, there is no means of determining whether or not such communications bypassed the Attorney General. ACTION: RLM β The attached letter be sent to the Attorney General. NW 65994 Docld:32989623 Page 3 wuc джа 2 بو TO : FROM : OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 JULY 1973 LUITION GSA FPMR (41 CFR)”
“, there is no means of determining whether or not such communications bypassed the Attorney General. ACTION: RLM β The attached letter be sent to the Attorney General. NW 65994 Docld:32989623 Page 3 wuc джа 2 بو TO : FROM : OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 JULY 1973 LUITION GSA FPMR (41 CFR)”
“, there is no means of determining whether or not such communications bypassed the Attorney General. ACTION: RLM β The attached letter be sent to the Attorney General. NW 65994 Docld:32989623 Page 3 wuc джа 2 بو TO : FROM : OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 JULY 1973 LUITION GSA FPMR (41 CFR)”
“nation as to why, if true, these intermediary agencies or organizations are used? The answer is it h as not. Can that be supplied, sir? Can you arrange to supp ly that to t he committee, a statement of the re File #: 62-116464 Released under the John F. Kennedy Assas sination Rec”
“here is no control file containing copies of all communications from the White House to this Bureau, and, short of a file by file review, there is no means of determining whether or not such communications bypassed the Attorney General. ACTION: RLM β The attached letter be sent t”
“I NT ELLIGENCE ACTI VITIES While our current policy is to send the Attorney General copies of alleco mmunications to the White House except special inquiry and name check replies there may be exceptions to this rule. This could only be determined by a complete review of all corre”
“I NT ELLIGENCE ACTI VITIES While our current policy is to send the Attorney General copies of alleco mmunications to the White House except special inquiry and name check replies there may be exceptions to this rule. This could only be determined by a complete review of all corre”
“nspection Inta Laboratory Legal Coun. Plan. & Eval. Spec. Inv. Training Telephone Rm. Director Sec'y This is to recommend attached letter be sent to the Attorney General in response to his memorandum of 7/16/75, also attached. For your information, there are additional attachment”
“nspection Inta Laboratory Legal Coun. Plan. & Eval. Spec. Inv. Training Telephone Rm. Director Sec'y This is to recommend attached letter be sent to the Attorney General in response to his memorandum of 7/16/75, also attached. For your information, there are additional attachment”
“nspection Inta Laboratory Legal Coun. Plan. & Eval. Spec. Inv. Training Telephone Rm. Director Sec'y This is to recommend attached letter be sent to the Attorney General in response to his memorandum of 7/16/75, also attached. For your information, there are additional attachment”
“I NT ELLIGENCE ACTI VITIES While our current policy is to send the Attorney General copies of alleco mmunications to the White House except special inquiry and name check replies there may be exceptions to this rule. This could only be determined by a complete review of all corre”
“tomatic Data Pr oc es Fi le #: Released under the John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection A ct of 1992 (44 USC 2107 Note). Case#:NW 65994 Date: 11-02-2021 62-116395 Serial Scope: NW 65994 Docld:32989623 Page 1 430 THRU 435 436 437 THRU 시사 Σ OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 MA 1962-E”
“tomatic Data Pr oc es Fi le #: Released under the John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection A ct of 1992 (44 USC 2107 Note). Case#:NW 65994 Date: 11-02-2021 62-116395 Serial Scope: NW 65994 Docld:32989623 Page 1 430 THRU 435 436 437 THRU 시사 Σ OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 MA 1962-E”
“atic Data Pr oc es si Fi le #: Released under the John F. Kennedy Assassination Records Collection A ct of 1992 (44 USC 2107 Note). Case#:NW 65994 Date: 11-02-2021 62-116395 Serial Scope: NW 65994 Docld:32989623 Page 1 430 THRU 435 436 437 THRU 시사 Σ OPTIONAL FORM NO. 10 MA 1962-E”
“lete review of all correspondence to the White House which could be extremely difficult and time con suming. Similarly, there is no control file containing copies of all communications from the White House to this Bureau, and, short of a file by file review, there is no means of ”
“to this rule. This could only be determined by a complete review of all correspondence to t he White House which could be extremely difficult and time consuming. Similarly, there is no control file containing copies of all communications from the White House to this Bureau, and, ”
“to this rule. This could only be determined by a complete review of all correspondence to t he White House which could be extremely difficult and time consuming. Similarly, there is no control file containing copies of all communications from the White House to this Bureau, and, ”
“the Attorney General copies of allecommunications to the White House except special inquiry and name check replies there may be exceptions to this rule. This could only be determined by a complete review of all correspondence to the White House which could be extremely difficult ”
“the Attorney General copies of allecommunications to the White House except special inquiry and name check replies there may be exceptions to this rule. This could only be determined by a complete review of all correspondence to the White House which could be extremely difficult ”
“the Attorney General copies of allecommunications to the White House except special inquiry and name check replies there may be exceptions to this rule. This could only be determined by a complete review of all correspondence to the White House which could be extremely difficult ”
“CLOSURE, NW 65994900 Id:32989623 Page4U.S. Sau 1163 Plan IVE on Savings EX P. PROC. 30 JUL17 1975 1 /rm Új-150 Ed. 4-26-65) UNITED STATES OVERNMENT Memo randum TO : Clarence M. Kelley Director, Federal Bureau o f Investigation FROM : The Attorney General DEPARTMENT OF JUSTI CE D”
“CLOSURE, NW 65994900 Id:32989623 Page4U.S. Sau 1163 Plan IVE on Savings EX P. PROC. 30 JUL17 1975 1 /rm Új-150 Ed. 4-26-65) UNITED STATES OVERNMENT Memo randum TO : Clarence M. Kelley Director, Federal Bureau o f Investigation FROM : The Attorney General DEPARTMENT OF JUSTI CE D”
“g copies of all com munications from the White House to this Bureau, and, short of a file by file re view, there is no means of determining whether or not such communications bypassed the Attorney General. ACTION: RLM β The attached letter be sent to the Attorney General. NW 6599”
“g copies of all com munications from the White House to this Bureau, and, short of a file by file re view, there is no means of determining whether or not such communications bypassed the Attorney General. ACTION: RLM β The attached letter be sent to the Attorney General. NW 6599”
“to this rule. This could only be determined by a complete review of all correspondence to t he White House which could be extremely difficult and time consuming. Similarly, there is no control file containing copies of all communications from the White House to this Bureau, and, ”
“g copies of all com munications from the White House to this Bureau, and, short of a file by file re view, there is no means of determining whether or not such communications bypassed the Attorney General. ACTION: RLM β The attached letter be sent to the Attorney General. NW 6599”
“re is no control file containing copies of all communications from the White House to this Bureau, a nd, short of a f ile by file review, there is no means of determining whether or not such communications bypassed the Attorney General. ACTION: RLM β The attached letter be sent t”