“in a separate memorandum. "3. Mr. RANKIN's staff showed us a detailed memorandum t hey had prepared based on all of the information available to them, including our own contribution concerning OSWALD's stay in the USSR. "4. Members of Mr. RANKIN's staff then spoke about having fo”
“um. "3. Mr. RANKIN's staff showed us a detailed memo randum they ha d prepared base d o n all of the information available to them, including our own contribution concerning OSWALD's stay in the USSR. "4. Members of Mr. RANKIN's staff then spoke about having found a book in OSWAL”
“'S stay in the Soviet Union as reported by the FBI, based on their interview of the defector, Y uriy Ivanovich NOSENKO. This discussion is reported in a separate memorandum. "3. Mr. RANKIN's staff showed us a detailed memorandum they had prepared based on all of the information a”
“d memor andum they had prepared based on all of the information available to them, including our own contribution concerning OSWALD's stay in the USSR. "4. Members of Mr. RANKIN's staff then spoke about having found a book in OSWALD's possessions which had certain letters cut out”
“detailed memorandum they had prepared based on all of the information available to them, including o ur own contributi on concerning OSWALD' s stay in the USSR. "4. Members of Mr. RANKIN's staff then spoke about having found a book in OSWALD's possessions which had certain letter”
“g OSWALD's stay in the USSR. "4. Member s of Mr. RANKIN's staff then spoke about having found a book in OSWALD's po ssessions which h ad certain letters cut out giving the impre- ssion that this might have formed the base or key for a cipher system. "5. Members of Mr. RANKIN's st”
“described in the third paragraph of our letter of February 12, 1964, which have not hither- to been furnished because of similar security conside- rations. In addition, we will be furnished actual copies of disseminations on October 10, 1963 to other federal agencies regarding in”
“information available to them, including our own contribution concerning OSWALD's stay in the USSR. "4. Members of Mr. RANKIN's staff then spoke about having found a book in OSWALD's possessions which had certain letters cut out giving the impre- ssion that this might have formed”
“by the book" and in good time, there were a number of errors in this advisory to the departments whi ch, on the record, were concerne d w ith the OSWALD case: a. OSWALD's middle name wa s given incorrectly as "Henry" for Harvey. The reason for this mistake is sim- plicity itself.”
“d memorandum they had prepared based on all of the informati on available to them, including our own contribution concerning OSWALD's stay in the USSR. "4. Members of Mr. RANKIN's staff then spoke about having found a book in OSWALD's possessions which had certain letters cut out”
“y may give assurance that the paraphrases are complete. "The same procedure would be followed with r espect to any materials described in the third paragraph of our letter of February 12, 1964, which have not hither- to been furnished because of similar security conside- rations.”
“of February 12, 164, with all indications of your cinfidential communications tech- niques and conf idential sources deleted. You will also afford members of our staff working in this area an opportunity to review the actual files so that they may give assurance that the paraphra”
“a book in OSW AL D's possessions which had certain let te rs cut out giving the im pre- ssion that t his might have formed the base or key for a cipher system. "5. Members of Mr. RANKIN's staff then com- mented on the testimony of Mrs. OSWALD to the effect that the letters from h”
“LD'S stay in the Soviet Union as reported by the FBI, based on their interview of the defector, Yuri y Ivanovich NOSENKO. This discussion is reported in a separate memorandum. "3. Mr. RANKIN's staff showed us a detailed memorandum they had prepared based on all of the information”
“bruary 12, 164, with all indicati ons of yo ur cinfidential communications tech- niques and confiden tial sources deleted. You will also afford members of our staff working in this area an opportunity to review the actual files so that they may give assurance that the paraphrases”
“h respect to any materials described in the third paragraph of our letter of February 12, 1964, whic h hav e n ot hither- to been furnished because of similar security conside- rations. In addition, we will be furnished actual copies of disseminations on October 10, 1963 to other”
“rking in this area an opportunity to review the actual files so that they may give assurance that th e paraphrases are complete. "The same procedure would be followed with respect to any materials described in the third paragraph of our letter of February 12, 1964, which have not”
“f each report or communication described in the second paragraph og our letter of Feb ruary 12, 164, with all indications of your cin fidential communications tech- n iques and confide ntial sources del ete d. You will also afford members of our staff working in this area an oppo”
“NFORMATION Date: 03/08/05 AGENCY ORIGINATOR: FROM : CIA TO : TITLE : INSPECTOR GENERAL MR . COLBY FO RM: TRANSMITTAL SLIP: ATTACHED IS THE UNCLASSIFIED STATEMENT ON OSWALD/ALSO RESPONSES TO PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION ON ALLEGATIONS REGARDING OSWALD 09/02/1975 DATE : PAGES : 38 SUBJE”
“n and wasn't normal." OSWALD was never questioned on his past nor asked to write an auto- biography. NW 65990 Docld:32397033 Page 6 304 TS No. 197124 Top Secret Copy SPEC A Ανώτα C C Top Secret (SEVENTH DEPARTMENT - January 1962-January 1964)”
“lems requiring paraphrasing.? "if these arrangements are satis factory to you, I wo uld appreciate y our advising Howard P. WILLENS or Samuel A. STERN fo our staff when it would be conven- ient to have them visit your Agency to review the files involved." NW 65924 Docld:32357059 ”
“sel. "At the conference held in my office last Thursday, March 12, we agreed to f orward to you cert ain documents. Those documents accompany this letter and they are as follows: "1. Three ring loose-leaf notebook containing a file entitled "Lee Harvey OSWALD and Marina OSWALD, D”
“with all indications of your cinfidential communications tech- niques and confide ntial sources dele ted. You will also afford members of our staff working in this area an opportunity to review the actual files so that they may give assurance that the paraphrases are complete. "T”
“ON Date: 03/ 08/05 AG ENCY ORIGINATOR: FROM : CIA TO : T ITLE : INSPECTOR GEN ERAL MR. COLBY FORM: T RANSMITTAL SLIP: ATTACHED IS THE UNCLASSIFIED STATEMENT ON OSWALD/ALSO RESPONSES TO PRESIDENTIAL COMMISSION ON ALLEGATIONS REGARDING OSWALD 09/02/1975 DATE : PAGES : 38 SUBJECTS :”
“the FBI on 23 December 1964. (201-322247). 6/ CSCI-316/02545-64 dated 23 December 1964 (201-322247). FBI memorandum dated 31 December 1964 DBA-9434, Subject: Lee Harvey OSWALD responding to CSCI-316/02545-64 (201-322247). NW 65990 Dóćld:32377692 Page 3 ! :”
“ord members of ou r staff working in this area an opportunity to rev iew the actual fi les so that t hey may give assurance that the paraphrases are complete. "The same procedure would be followed with respect to any materials described in the third paragraph of our letter of Feb”
“second paragr aph og our l etter of February 12, 164, with all indications o f your cinfidential co mmunications tech- niques and confidential sources deleted. You will also afford members of our staff working in this area an opportunity to review the actual files so that they ma”
“py attached to accompanying report) 1. This is further to, and in completion of, my interim memor an dum of a few weeks ago. - 2. The attachment is a detailed review in narrative, chronological order together with appropriate comment- ary of our extensive holdings on the OSWALD c”
“Mr. RANKIN concerned information on Lee Harvey OSW ALD'S stay in the Soviet Union as reported by th e FBI, based on their interview of the defector, Yuriy Ivanovich NOSENKO. This discussion is reported in a separate memorandum. "3. Mr. RANKIN's staff showed us a detailed memorand”
“ch do not present security problems requiring paraphrasing.? "if these arrangement s are satis facto ry to you, I would appreciate your advising Howard P. WILLENS or Samuel A. STERN fo our staff when it would be conven- ient to have t hem visit your Ag ency to review the files in”
“f the third paragraph of our letter, which do not present security problems requiring paraphrasing.? "if these arrangements are satis factory to you, I would appreciate your advising Howard P. WILLENS or Samuel A. STERN fo our staff when it would be conven- ient to have them visi”
“? "if these arrangements are satis fac tory to you, I would appreciate your advising Howard P. WILLE NS or Samuel A. STERN fo our staff when it would be conven- ient to have them visit your Agency to review the files involved." NW 65924 Docld:32357059 Page 6 SECRET 6 17 March 196”
“rding information on OSWALD'S ac- tivities in Mexico City, and any other material s not already furn ished and within the scope of the third paragraph of our letter, which do not present security problems requiring paraphrasing.? "if these arrangements are satis factory to you, I”
“es, particular... protection measures, and any other aspect which ap- pears relevant?" 16 March 1964 Letter to Mr. Richard HELMS, Deputy Director for Plans, dated 16 March 1964, from J. Lee RANKIN, General Counsel. "I would like to confirm our understanding of the arrangements ag”
“ereto. "In connection with your memorandum dated January 31, 1964, the Commission has asked me to re quest you to submit to the Commission the following: (There follows twelve requirements.) 12 February 1964 Letter to Mr. Thomas H. KARAMESSINES, Acting Deputy Director for Plans, ”
“conven- ient to have them visit your Agency to review the files involved." NW 65924 Docld:323570 59 Page 6 SECRET 6 17 March 1964 Letter to Mr. Richard HELMS, Deputy Director for Plans, dated 17 March 1964, from J. Lee RANKIN, General Counsel. "At the conference held in my office”
“2, we agreed to forward to you certain document s. Thos e documents accompany this lette r a nd they are as follows: "1. Three ring loose-leaf notebook containing a file entitled "Lee Harvey OSWALD and Marina OSWALD, Docu mentary Record of Contacts with the United States Departme”
“allegation, it would be greatly appreciated if you would furnish us with an inter im resume of any d evelopments pertinent thereto. "In connection with your memorandum dated January 31, 1964, the Commission has asked me to request you to submit to the Commission the following: (T”
“ommiss ion Docu ment No. 361] Memorandum from AD DP to J. Lee RANKIN. for ward ing three copies of A ppendix B, a summary biography of Mrs. OSWALD and her relatives. •8 February 1964 * [Commission Document No. 1182] Letter from ADDP to J. Lee RANKIN regarding Soviet weapon mentio”
“IR-92725, 6 January 1964 [FOIA No. 456-771] 14. Memorandum for J. Lee RANKIN, dated 6 March 1964; Su be jct: Jaf Bation in SA Possession Regarding Lee Harvey EDUCTION B ADDHO Novender 22 , 19 63. [FOIA 590-252 15. Note fr om HELMS LDDOUNDTEd 6 March 1 964 PROHIBITED 16. Memorandu”
“to request you to submit to the Commission the following: (There follows twelve require men ts. ) 1 2 February 1964 Letter to Mr. Thomas H. KARAMESSINES, Acting Deputy Director for Plans, dated 12 February 1964, from J. Lee RANKIN, General Counsel. "After your conversation with M”
“the chain of evidence in the OSWALD case on 23 November 1963 by an FBI representative in Dallas. The successive vicissi- tudes which hav e now m ade this event a ca use cel ebre right down to the present moment are detailed in the narrative. NW 65990 DocId:32374461 Page SECRET JI”
“g information on OSWALD'S ac- tivities in Mexico City, a nd any other mate rials not already furn is hed and within the scope of the third paragraph of our letter, which do not present security problems requiring paraphrasing.? "if these arrangements are satis factory to you, I w”
“d in my office last Thursday, March 12, we agreed to forward to you certain documents. Those documen ts accompany th is letter and they are as follows: "1. Three ring loose-leaf notebook containing a file entitled "Lee Harvey OSWALD and Marin a OSWA LD, Documenta ry Record of Con”
“No. 697-294] 24. Note dated 10 April 1964 listing material from P-85 93 shown to W arren Comm issio n. [FOIA No. 653-828] 25. Brief for Presentation to President's C om mission on the Assassination of President Kennedy, 14 May 1964. [ΧΑΑΖ-27212 - FOIA No. 695-302A] 26. Memorandum”
“SUGGESTED THAT MUCH, IF NOT ALL PAPERS ON OSWALD'S PERSONAL HISTORY HAVE BEEN DECLASSIFIED FOR USE BY MEDIA, *RESEARCHERS AND<ASSASSINATION>BUFFS AS PART OF OVERALL<KENNEDY> *ASSASSINATION>DECLASSIFICATION PROGRAM. COS ALSO RECALLED THAT THE UPI REPORTERS STORY, IN SOME FORM,”
“20040112-1033527 [R] ITEM IS RESTRICTED 104-10103-10194 NW 6592 4 Docld:3235705 9 Page 1 SEODET SLU IILI Discussions between Warren Commission and CIA 31 January 1964 Letter to Mr. Richard HELMS, Deputy Director for Plans, dated 31 January 1964, from J. Lee RANKIN, General Counse”
“n to or ment ioned by Lee Harv ey OSWALD or his wife. "Based on an initial review I am confident tha t this material will be of great assistanc e to the work of this Commission. However, I have a question r e- garding the mention of an appe ndix in the Name L ist. For example, th”
“ecall an investigation is currently being pursued with respect to an allegation of some significance which emanated from the White House and which is not referred to in the above-mentioned report. With respect to this allegation, it would be greatly appreciated if you would furni”
“ootnote for that statement; it may refer only to the presence of the FBI report on the FPCC in Or al d's CIA file, but that should be checked. : NW 65990 Docld:32374478 Page 5 1 04-10196-10027 1 3. -5- COMPUTER IZED FILE ENTRIE S FOR OSWALD AN D O”