“Legislative Counsel. Mr. Yale: responded that he recognized the legitimacy of the in quiry. Mr. Yale explained that subsequent to initiation, of the complete audit being undertaken by Mr. Quinn of *- the Audit Staff, the Deputy Director for Management and Services, Mr. Haro”
“Logislative Counsel, Mr. Yale responded that he recognized the legitimacy of the in- quiry. Mr. Yals explained that subsequent to initiation of the complete audit being undertaken by Mr. Quinn of -- the Audit Staff, the Deputy Director for Management and Services, Mr. Harold”
“diem. y d. We made a specific analysis of Mr. Hunt’s advance account for the period he was under <’ non-official cover (July ‘65-Sept ‘66) and have E2 IMPDET, CL BY: 006567 CLA• CT”
“interview was arranged with the General Foods Corpora tion, a Mullen client. Mr. O’Malley stated there was disappointment that Mr. Hunt had been unsuccessful in "selling himself" during any of these interviews and that no job offers had resulted. In response to a question a”
“1 4-00000 f ( ( t. ( ( 3. Mr. Roccawasthoroughly candid and cooperative during the course of this interview. He was unable to suggest alternate Deans of attempting to determine if any official Agency sponsorship of Mr. Hunt did in fact exist. Mr. Rocca did venture the ”
“interview was arranged with the General Foods Corpora tion, a Mullen client. Mr. O'Malley stated there was disappointment that Mr. Hunt had been unsuccessful in "selling himself" during any of these interviews and that no job offers had resulted. In response to a question a”
“i€Cu73rv osonci 6002343 - 7- HUNt 503 worked operation with him in 9/61 (approved by by Helms reassignedfS 1/17/62 DDP/CAstA Office of CFsto C F. the Chief 2121-1000-1000 ENVELOPE "Re Investigation + Apprasel Info dtd 11/62 + 2/63 Sanitized version 162 Huntareq”
“0002346 -10 - - Hunt SrGD-T vh^i 5. Mr. Mr. George Helms then asked whether my wife should register under thee F Fordign Registration Act andAgents Mr. Helms said that under the circumstances she absolutely should not signed H. H 11 F.R. This upset Agency beca”
“ontBHwoo if Th, sin a Phone (Area 202) 544-6000 A. No. He was on a duty status the day before, on sick 2i leave, and then on duty status the following day. BY MR. MANFREDI: / 1 0 Was there any effort to determine what Mr. Hunt’s 5 previous pattern with respect to sick”
“ngemwoU# Phone (Area 202) 544-6000 A. No. He was on a duty status the day before, on sick leave, and then on duty status the following day. BY MR. MANFREDI: Q. Was there any effort to determine what Mr. Hunt’s = : previous pattern with respect to sick days had been? ”
“14-00000 2 1 .under the impression that Mr. Hunt’s writing activities were either being encouraged or subsidized directly by this Agency in any official effort. Mr. Ryan re sponded that he was personally not aware of any such arrangement. He added as an expression of pers”
“14-00000 tolinu (- 3. A review of the circumstances surrounding Mr. Hunt’s conversion to Contract Type A employment and assignment was then undertaken by Messrs. Yalo, Caufield, Hudson and the undersigned. The contract and payroll files of Mr. Hunt wore reviewed for poss”
“14-00000 12 SEC. 24. MISCELLANEOUS A. DO YOU ADVOCATE OR HAVE YOU EVER ADVOCATED; OR ARE YOU NOW OR HAVE YOU 1 EVER BEEN A MEMBER OR. OR HAVE YOU SUPPORTED ANY POLITICAL PARTY OR ORGANI- ZATION WHICH ADVOCATES THE OVERTHROW OF OUR CONSTITUTIONAL FORM OF GOV- ERNMENT IN THE”
“14-00000 vlilu ‘s'- (- ( 5. IA review of the circumstances surrounding Mr. Hunt’s conversion to Contract Type A employment and assignment was then undertaken by Messrs. Yalo, Caufiold, Hudson and the undersigned. The contract and payroll files of Mr. Hunt were reviewed ”
“gmmp o@ m Phone (Area 202) 644-6000 A. No. He was on a duty status the day before, on sick gi leave, and then on duty status the following day. BY MR. MANFREDI: Q. Was there any effort to determine what Mr. Hunt's 5 : previous pattern with respect to sick days had been”
“recall the name of this individual. He did, however, state that he is quite certain Mr. Hunt turned down the individual whom he referred. As a point of clarification, Mr. O’Malley said that this individual had not previously been known to Mr. Hunt, nor had she previously work”
“this individual. He did, however,- state that he is quite certain Mr. Hunt turned down the individual whom he referred. As a point of clarification, Mr. O’Malley said that this individual had not previously been known to Mr. Hunt, nor had she previously worked for him in any”
“retired 30 April 1970. Subsequent to the retirement, a David St. John book appeared in print in 1971 and another in 1972. These manuscripts wars apparently prepared during the time that Mr. Hunt was employed by the Robert R. Mullen Company. :.j.Lentik:, 3. Minutes from the ”
“officially retired. ■ It is 3 & , specifically noted that Mr.’ Hunt retired 30 April 1970. : - Subsequent to the retirement, a David St. John book appeared . : % in print in 1971 and another in 1972. These manuscripts I. were apparently prepared during the time that Mr. Hunt ”
“Department of State, and Mr. Hunt’s basic status as a CIA employee would not be denied if raised by members of the press. Messrs. Colby and Meyer agreed that this was the only feasible line to take. I then . as ked Mr. Colby whether additional clearance from the DCI was requir”
“14-00000 OLUACI 4. As I was leaving my office, Mr. Tegethoff called Mr.: :Franklin a second time to say that in the evening of 20 June 1972, - Mr. John King, Department of State’s Press Office, and Mr. John , Unumb of CIA had discussed press inquiries in regard to Mr. Hunt”
“14-00000 6- il under the impression that Mr. Hunt's writing activities were either being encouraged or subsidized directly by this Agency in any official effort. Mr. Ryan re sponded that he was personally not aware of any such arrangement. He added as an expression of per”
“14-00000 & C( / 6% 4. Mr. O’Malley stated that contact was maintained, with Nr. Hunt while at the Mullen Company on a continuing basis, because Mr. O’Malley was interested in Mr. Hunt................ for possible referral of other Agency retirees. Mr.. O'Malley also unde”
“. 4-00000 *4 0 SEGAEI J__o 3/0 MEMORANDUM FOR: Office of Finance THROUGH ; Chief, Contract Personnel Division SUBJECT : Engagement of E. How.rd Hunt .8 Indenendent Contr ctor Under Men orindum of Or I Contract 1. Effective 2 November 1970, subject was retained under ”
“produced positive intelligence on the Iberian in target during this period the officials responsible for this effort within the Western European Division - were totally unawareof it. . - .... .. _ ■ 1 ~ 3. Mr. Ryan stated that most of his knowledge of Mr. Hunt’s activity and”
“14-00000 / ( J I ( V i 3. Mr. Rocca was thoroughly candid and cooperative during the course of this interview. He was unable to suggest alternate means ofattempting to determine if any official Agency sponsorship of Mr. Hunt did in fact exist. Mr. Rocca did venture th”
“14-00000 MEMORANDUM FOR ATTACHMENT TO CA-2 Filed by E. Hloward Hunt Ny first knowledge of Mr. Hunt’s illness was on the morning of 12 October when his office informed me that he became 111 and was taken to the hospital with a "bleeding ulcer". He has been on sick leave sin”
“14-00000 ( SECRET (- SUBJECT: Howard Hunt 6. The Office, of Finance has not found operational expenditures except for the $1,600 mentioned above. Therefore, it is suggested that Mr. Karamessines be questioned as to a project or projects to which Mr. Hunt's operational ”
“SECRET 93 Phone (/Area 202) $44-0000 1 A. No. He was on a duty status the day before, on sick 2 : leave, and then on duty status the following day. BY MR. MANFREDI: o : Q. Was there any effort to determine what Mr. Hunt’s 4i 5 i previous pattern with respect to sick d”
“or illn Dhud i’h. Ihm & Phone (Area 202) 544-6000 iday to the next where he was? A. No. Q Have you ever conducted any kind of inquiry on behalf jof the Agency as to where he was on November 22, 1963? A. Yes. 1 Q And when did you conduct that inquiry? / A. I have do”
“14-00000 ( ( S. A review of all of the travel vouchers on record for Mr. Hunt during this period also failed to identify a project. In addition to the PCS and return vouchers, two othor accountings aza ou record. One accounting covered a trip by the entire Hunt family to”
“SECRET when Filter I"1. SECTION XS . NARRATIVE COMMENTS ‘Indicate significant strengths or weaknesses demonstrated in current position keeping in proter per spective their relation ship to - " ’“ overall per ' ’ “ formonco.* *4 State suggestionsimade . .. of work for impr”
“from Mr. Kingsley’s office. He further stated that he was never briefed on the purpose of Mr. Hunt's mission and could add little in terms of speculation. Mr. Powell recommended that Mr. Edward Ryan, who was then Deputy Chief of Western European • Division, be contacted. Mr.”
“awihe his the. lie II Phone (Area 202) 544-6000 3 a day to the next where he was? 2 1 A. No. Q Have you ever conducted any kind of inquiry on behalf i of the Agency as to where he was on November 22, 1963? A. Yes. Q And when did you conduct that inquiry? 7 A. I hav”
“ember 1956 authorized Hunt to travel to and from Havana on TDY during the period 7-15 December 1956. b) Manuscript, page 8,9--"In 1926, at the height of the Florida boom, my father was practicing law in Miami Beach"; the manuscript goes on to indicate that Subject's father had a ”
“ember 1956 authorized Hunt to travel to and from Havana on TDY during the period 7-15 December 1956. b) Manuscript, page 8,9--"In 1926, at the height of the Florida boom, my father was practicing law in Miami Beach"; the manuscript goes on to indicate that Subject's father had a ”
“14-00000 ( (- 5. A review of all of the travel vouchers on record for Mr. Hunt during this period also failed to identify a project. In addition to the PCS and return vouchers. two othor accountings are on record. One accounting covered a trip by the entire Hunt family to”
“1 4-00000 ( 1 .. c. He also suggested that another person--definitely no friend of Hunt--who might have some recall or have picked up information about the book-writing matter might be Anita Potocki of CI Staff, formerly of . Division D. (I gather that she did not have of”
“me approached $100,000) I must again pay legal fees occasioned by the interest of the Senate in matter of no iscernible benefit to me. Between last January and April I could freely have traveled to Washington to testify at the pleasure of the Senate. From then on I could' hav”
“1 4-00000 SECEET fasa 30 April 1969. MEMORANDUM IN LIEU OF FITNESS REPORT ,SUBJECT : Howard E. Hunt, GS-15, Employee Number 013842, DOB: October 1918; EUR/CA; Career; Service Designa tion: D. . PERIOD UNDER REVIEW : 22 June 1968 - 31 March 19689 MONTHS UNDER MY SUPER”
“from Mr. Kingsley's. office.. He further stated that he was never briefed on the purpose of Mr. Hunt’s mission and could add little in .terms of speculation. Mr. Powell recommended that Mr. Edward Ryan, who was then Deputy Chief of Western European Division, be contacted. Mr”
“-00000 CL X 0 4. Mr. O’Malicy stated that contact was maintained with Nr. Hunt while at the Mullen Company on a continuing basis, because Mr. O’Malley was interested in Nr. Hunt - ----- for possible referral of other Agency retirees. Mr. O’Malley also understood that there”
“14-00000 (- SECRET A. SUBJECT: Howard Hunt 6. The Office of Finance has not found operational expenditures except for the $1,600 mentioned above. Therefore, it is suggested that Mr. Karamessines be questioned as to a project or projects to which.Mr. Hunt’s operational ”
“14-00000 k O’Malley recalled that Mr. Hunt expressed dissatisfaction with that suggestion in part because of what Mr. Miunt1 viewed as that firm’s political orientation. Mr. O'Malley did not elaborate further on that remark. Mr. O’Malley then suggested the use of Anderson”
“4 © A. Ltr from William A. Snyder, Jr. to Mr. Clapper - Re: E. Howard th* Hunt, Jr. - 6 May 75 9 72 B. Memo from Knoche to Olsen - 12 Mar 75 80% Note. C. Ltr from Clapper to Mr. Howard St. John Hunt- 25 Apr 75 D. Memo from Clapper to Olsen - Subj: Phone Interview w/”
“operational account was established for Mr. Hunt with the Chase Manhattan Bank of New York City. A review of all payments made to Mr. Hunt through the Chase bank account through Mr. Hunt’s operational advance subsidiary account, or 1442 account, had been made. Thore was no r”
“royalty offset waiver provision amaeaded to Mr. Hunt’s contract was, in his ex- perience, somewhat unusual. . 7. Mr. Yala was informed by the undersigned of the intention to interview Mr. Edward Ryan, currently Chief, Division D, who was at the time of Mr. Hunt’s Madrid assi”
“had any relationship with Mr. Hunt whatsoever. In response to these questions Mr. Rocca responded "on the record” that he has no knowledge of any such arrangements nor at any time was he party to any , assistance or any requests for assistance to Mr. Hunt. Mr.‘ -Rocca stated”
“0000 / SECRET SUBJECT: Howard Hunt 6. The Office of Finance has not found operational expenditures except for the $1,600 mentioned above. Therefore, it is suggested that Mr. Karamessines be questioned as to a project or projects to which Mr. Hunt’s operational expenditu”
“royalty offset waiver provision ammended to Mr. Hunt's contract was, in his ex- perience, somewhat unusual. 7. Mr. Yala was informed by the undersigned of the intention to interview Mr. Edward Ryan, currently Chief,- Division D, who was at the time of Mr. Hunt's Madrid assig”