“me Section 0.15(b) (7) under your proposed Order. The following is in response to your nemorandum of April”
Searching the archive...
“me Section 0.15(b) (7) under your proposed Order. The following is in response to your nemorandum of April”
“ecome Section 0.15(b) (7) under your proposed Order. The following is in response to your nemorandum of Apri”
“ecome Section 0.15(b) (7) under your proposed Order. The following is in response to your nemorandum of Apri”
“m responding to the above request. It is requested that y ou furnish a copy of th e enclosed memo ra ndum to the HSCA. Enclosures (2) 62-117290 " RRCB:pm (7) GITAL Assoc. Dir. Dep.”
“pertaining to him has not been feasible." w N /s e 3. (U) Recommendations: See Tabs 12-4S. ig "d s p 4. (U) This memorandum has as yet not been coordinated XX with Mr. Zicbell of the Office of the General Counsel. is q p z g riyalA Winthrop W. Brown (C) -e v ”
“Approved: 1000 Sent M Per iur Special Agent in Charge NW 88296 Docld:32989574 Page 17 ■”
“relating to this violation. ’.**. ‘ ... *-*****2*ke74/ke f.[Deleted] . . : . - - ...- 4 _. «*oh*pau70 Big • 0g*a**i9it ) 95-97 4-12-68 NW 88321 Docld:32989529 Page 507”
“NAME AND SIGNATURE do/ i363 DC/LE--------------------------- Roland E. Dulin X BY REVIEWING OFFICIAL ' COMMENTS or REVIEWING OFFICIAL I concur in above assessment. DATE OFFICIAL TITLE OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL TYPED OR PRINTED NAMES AND SIGNATURE 9. • J ADR ........ .....”
“does not appear that it was handled indiscreetly and. therefore, no administrative action is recommended. 0 A .60 -2- NW 88326_Docld:32989704 Page 156”
“r your approval and forwarding to the SSC is the original of a memorandum in further partial respone n to the aforementioned two SSC requests. Also enclosed for your records is a copy of the memorandum which is being delivered to you with a set of the materials which are being de”
“ACTION THIS CASE UNTIL ADVISED. MOF DID NOT QUESTION THIS RATIONALE AND PROMISED TO COMPLY. wa Dw 3. PLS IDENTIFY CARE? MENTIONED PARA 2.REF. SECRET * SECRET”
“E TO BE RETAINED. THOSE NOT INDICATED FOR PETENTION ARE AUTHOR. ZED FOR IMMEDATE DESTRUCTION 4. 141c NW 65990 Docld:32404765 Page 2 ☐ CONTINUED ON SEPARATE PAGE 115-30)”
“the house. (Note Below.) Michael V. SLATINSKI I would appreciate your giving personal attention to this matter, because it is rare that we have such a detailed assessment as we have in this case. Edward D. SABETAY - - T CLASSil CATION 201-735296 PAGE NO. IFORM a-64”
“granted no 4/2 . both in the order and our proposed statute, particularly in the area of requirements. ' 24 it‘s import ant to haze this caveat, if vou il 1. oR Now recommendation 1 : really suggests that- the oversight TOP SECRET v**D A AUL NW 50955 DocId:32423509 ”
“e. : DIR 84917 (ref DIR 84916 - para 51 above) fully informed on developments ref. Assume you are ke eping Legal : ! MEXI 7040 - U.S. Consula”
“language in paragraph number 7 should. 62-116375--664 be tightened up and the appropriate terms defined. REC- 106 0 puclosuiei,. Legal Counsel Division Jan 6 APR 15 1975 ’ 2 - Enclosure demnesentte stovewiiowr 4/9/75 ABOVE WAS BROUGHT TO THE ATTH OF JOHN WARNER, ”
“attached to the file copy of enclosed LHM. Exact copies of the materials being furnished are mainta ined in the office of the SENSTUD Y Project and a detail ed record has been maintained of the materials furnished. Arrangements have been made for a represe ntative of the Legal Co”
“14-00000 CONFIDENTIAL 5. Mr. Strickland of OGC has concurred in these recommendations. A. B. Swider DDO Appeals Officer Attachments: Tab A - References A-C . Tab B - Full Text and Sanitized Versions Tab C - Army Document for Referral -3- CONFIDENTIAL”
“FROB 5827. * Resettled during the reporting period. Subject will not appear on next month’s or subsequent HARVARD reports unless and until some new unforeseen aspect of the case arises requiring additional HARVARD action. In this event the case will be listed and the new acti”
“retain a copy of the affidavit. A copy will remain on file at the Committee and accessible to you at any time. I look forward to receiving the sworn statement. Once again many thanks for your cooperation and careful attention to this matter. Fredricka Barry Frederick D. B”
“connection with cases captioned: BERNARD S. LEE, Y REC-46 CLARENCE M. KEPA 62-117290-638 ET (U.S.D .C., D.C.) CIVIL ACTION #76-1185 B UF ILE 62-117194 -Bureau (Encs. 14) (1-package) 2-M emphi”
“0 ..1 . r’t 0 / • •A1 ■J 41, LA 100-79791 **, % -• ■ The enclosed LH: is classified confidential because it contains information from C which ImForman could reasonably result in source’s identif ication. 1 * 7 - e i- S t a weir -2- NW 88321 Docld:32989545. Pa”
“of Congress. (Please specify.)______ ___ _____ _ Carl M. Emanuel 6/2/77 NW 88326 Docl:32243307 Page 7”
“I concur in the above evaluation. DATE 19 suit '46 OFFiciau rirue or REVIEWING OFFICIAL I Deputy Assistant for | Plans and Development SECRET 77eie I 1 4 1 9”
“current / . report and case retained in pending status with .f ‘e investigation continuing to determine missing itei of information. 47 5-5-68 NW 88321 Docld:32989529 Page 430 %”
“been furnished to the recipients of this letter. No investigation is requested since this matter is being handled through the appropriate -Legal Attaches, It”
“information of a collateral nature. (See Section III, H.) Attachment: Typed cpy Memo from NOSENKO . 5 6001055 edrErdridorhi) a-.mP LAE”
“hat this would not be necessary. He returned our exhibits and told us to consider the matter closed. NW 65990 Docld:32392257 Page 9”
“E R7) —d "v: - 1 < e $0800 0, Sicre $31 HOW IoRW—- KS/TS EN EY: Wiehn deh Coysnel Approved: Sent 932 Per 55JAM-*,*/>*}/ , 21. Special Agent in Charge Sth tD. NW 88321 Docld:32989544 Page 269”
“involved, as by so doing he may cast off suspicion. 9 2-12-60 NW 88321 Docl:32989529 Page 1393." - 84°”
“13-00000■ 04/16/97 WED 16:15 FAX 202 724 0457 AKiW Mr. J. Barry Harrelson April 16, 1997 Page 12 Conclusion Please let me know if you have any supplements or corrections. We would very much like to ensure that these matters are handled expeditiously. As always, we appre”
“reads, I would have or would be opposed to it because 24 it provides an exception with the approval of the versight 25 TAnEDET NW 50955 DocId: 32423513 Page 67”
“already have adequate - contractual authority. -. '• ’: /&, & S.comen Charles W. Sandman Concur: Date: . Vs/, John A. Risso g.FES 1970 Office of General Counsel Distribution: Orig & 1 - Addressee 1 - OGC/OSMLD SECRET E2 IMPDET 26 OP/CPD. CL BY: 063837”
“13-00000 == 1 1 PAGE NO._ wa PK#TT . DECIPHERED BY: _D CHECKED BY RELEASED BY 1, 071 - PRECEDENCE ROUTINE :DATE :25 APRIL 51 6-518 FILE NUMBER : IN. 27092 21-16-7-81 KO PARAPHRASE REQUIRED EDITED BY: 36 0*2 ATKEG A. AI FOR TGSCALE. .nzy CASE 38789 (OUT: 976”
“DEC MAILING NOTICES AND CHECKS. A 2 3. THE FEW PREVIOUS CASES AS NOTED PARA 3 REF WERE HANDLED OAD HOC BASIS WHEN BROUGHT TO JMWAVE ATTENT ION. NO FIRM PAVO POLICY WAS ESTABLISHED. FURTHER, JMWAVE NOT AWARE ANY COMMITMENTS TO DE PEIDENT S BY WOFACT. 4. RE CASE 59 REF, RE”
“n ation Rec ords Colle ction Act of 1992 ( 44 USC 2 107 Note). Case#:NW 65994 D ate: 11-02-2021 62-J N-544 Seria l Sco pe: Ex 7 thu 9,14 t hou 16,18,22”
“n ation Rec ords Colle ction Act of 1992 ( 44 USC 2 107 Note). Case#:NW 65994 D ate: 11-02-2021 62-J N-544 Seria l Sco pe: Ex 7 thu 9,14 t hou 16,18,22”
“SECRET Senior Counsels HW 50955 DocId: 32203861 Page 6 1303 13110 3/20/15”
“of anyone. As a 25 matter of fact, the memorandums on ' this refer to dozens of tenesone NW 50955 DocId: 32423513 Page 36”
“532-536, 41 Union Square West, New York City.• The SWP has been designated pursuant to Executive Order 10450. This document contains neither • : 3 . conelesions of reenrx * * rty of d.F *1. ‘. to your agency: , 17 - 0F:1..• it ara net to be : an d i* S 0, ■ distributed”
“22. document in front of you, Memorandum for the Record. 13 Mr. Nosenko. I do not have it. 24 Mr. Klein. The Ryan Report. I draw your attention to page 05 9. NW 50955 DocId: 32277209 Page 50 otLitI de- lease V 04 iti 4 wn7-7zsa S BIM: IICont "^ro ‘orm"UsEcaxe9%-e-rreype”
“matter and see no need to pursue it further at this time. Attachment: Sohn Tins Tarwag JCHN kb MAURY Legislative Counsel Plutribetion: Original - CLC Subject ehe 1.20? 1 - Chief, Ci State 1 - Chief, SB Division 1 - D Security * - EG 1 - OLC Chroco EGRET so”
“,0 4 1 NY 134-2112 -The NYO will advise the Bureau of further activities in this matter.. (4) 0 AD *I . 6 - -2-■ “Shue free NW 88326 Docld:32989704 Page 30”
“campaigns and press releases as current developments dictate. Delvia B. Monestici Philip G. ELMARD CLASSIFICATION PAGE NO. FORM, 530 5-60 USE PREVIOUS EDITION SECRET 2 of 2 140. CONTINUED”
“meeting and the testimony about its significance on the issue of authorization is discussed in detail in Section 5 (iii), infra. NW 50955 DocId: 32423539 Page 251”
“SECRET) 4. Current Research Assignment 5. Comptroller General Decision CONFIDENTIAL Photocopy from G R Ford Library NW 50955 DocId:32105598 Page 46”
“000 Docld:32245479 Page 4 Mr. Rex D. Davis, Director Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco and Firearms GRB:jsc 4 Thank you for your cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, M.Obtent Blobey G. Robert Blakey Chief Counsel and Director cc: Mr. J. Robert McBrien Special Assistant for Special Leg”
“a2 Attorney General has advised that he does not have funds or ***** wZykeooaas*8k 43 *-*wst 4-12-68 NW 88321 Docld:32989529 Page 482”
“on of other government agencies unless specifically directed by the Attorney General to investigate. REPRODUCTION PROHIBITED NW 65990 Docld:32390932 Page 4 0003668 PAGE 14 of COPY NO. 65 4 ーヤー”
“exhibits, have same reviewed by Mr. Wilderotter. INTD will insure exhibits are made available for Mr. Wilderotter's review. NRW Cig ath Wife -2- NW 88296 Docld:32989628 Page 259”