“ns; however, a decision to emphasize only his mistreatment would be only embarrassing to the Agency. 5 NW 65924 Docld:32354856 Page 8 IV. In the absence of agreement with the HSCA on how sensitive matters are to be handled in its public hearings, the Agency may face the dilemma o”
“o ; however,-a decision to emphasize only his mistreatment would be only embarrassing to the Agency. 5 SECRFI NW 65924 Docld:32401070 Page 7 SECRET IV. In the absence of agreement with the HSCA on how sensitive matters are to be handled in its public hearings, the Agency may face”
“OFFICERS AND AGENT CRYPTONYMS. IT IS NOW THE INTENTION OF THE COMMITTEE TO SEND STAFF MEMBERS TO A NUMBER OF COUNTRIES TO INTERVIEW INDIVIDUALS IN THE FIELD. WE ARE, OF COURSE, MOST CONCERNED_ABOUT THE PROTECTION OF OUR SOURCES AND THE IDENTITIES OF OUR NONOFFICIAL OFFICERS.”
“HIM, INCLUDING OBLIGATIONS AS TO CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMAT ION AC QUIRED AS FBÌ EMPLOYEE. IT IS EM PHASIZED THAT BUREAU'S OFFER OF ASSIST ANCE IS NOT INTENDED TO IM PEDE SSC WOR K BUT IS DONE A'S C OOPERATIVE G ESTURE AND TO SAFEGUA RD SENSIT IVE BUREAU INFORMATION. CONTACTS WI”
“ONS (HSCA) SA Sammon was then questioned regarding the Bureau policy in discontinuing informants and if the informants are advised th at t”
“ONS (HSCA) SA Sammon was then questioned regarding the Bureau policy in discontinuing informants and if the informants are advised th at t”
“CALL. YOUR CONVERSATIONS WITH FORMER EMPLOYEES MUST BE IN KEEPING WITH OUR PLEDGE. IT I S BELIEVED S UCH A PROCEDURE WOULD INSU RE PROP ER PROTECTION AND ALSO FACILITATE THE WORK OF THE SSC. THE ABOVE PROCEDURE ALSO APPLIES TO CURRENT EMPLOYEES OF YOUR OFFICE . H OWE VER , C ONT ”
“IS BELIEVED SUCH A PROCEDURE WOULD INSURE PROPER PROTECTION AND ALSO FACILITATE THE SORK OF THE SSC. THE ABOVE PROCEDURE ALSO APPLIED TO CURRENT EMPLOYEE S OF YOUR OFFI CE. HOWEVER, CO NTA CT WI TH TH E LEGAL C OUN”
“PLOYMENT, HE SHOULD BE INSTRUCTED TO CONTACT LEGAL COJHOEL, FDIHC, DY COLLECT CA LL. Y OUR CONVERSAT IONS WITH FORMER EMPLOYEES MUST D E IN KEEPING WITH OUR PLEDGE. IT IS BELIEVED SUCH A PROCEDURE WOULD INSURE PROPER PROTECTION AND A LSO FACILITATE THE SORK OF THE S SC. THE ABOVE”
“employees of their non-eligibility for participation in the System based upon the initial finding of an employee’s Career Service has been followed in all such cases. This is contrary to the implication in paragraph 2 of your memorandum that other employees in circumstances s”
“IHC, DY COLLECT CALL. YO UR CONVERSATIONS WITH FORMER EMPLOYEES MUST DE IN KEEPING WITH O UR P LE DG E. IT IS BELIEVED SUCH A PROCEDURE WOULD INSURE PROPER PROTECTION AND ALSO FACILITATE THE SORK OF THE SSC. THE ABOVE PROCEDURE ALSO APPLIED TO CURRENT EMPLOYEES OF YOUR OFFICE. HO”
“which do not qualify under BEC regulations. c. The BEC pays PayB aa lump sum to the Ageney to the fundc : Agency fund. which would continue the payments at the present rate and under the present system until all cases are terminated. 4. One of the most serious problems fa”
“TION NOT TO DIVULGE INFOR- MATION OBTAINED BY VIRTUE OF HIS POT FSI EMPLOYMENT, HE SHOULD BE INSTRUC TED T O CONTACT LEGAL COJHOEL, FDIHC, DY COLLECT CALL . Y OU R CONVERSATIONS WITH FORMER EMPL OY EES M US T DE I N KEEPING WITH OUR PLEDGE. IT IS BELIEVED SUCH A PR OC EDURE WOULD”
“TH OUR PLEDGE. IT IS BELIEVED SUCH A PROCEDURE WOULD INSURE PROPER PROTECTION AND ALSO FACILITATE TH E WORK OF THE SSC. THE ABOVE PROCE DURE ALSO APPLIES TO CURRENT EMPLOYEES OF YOUR OFF ICE. HOWEVER, CONTACT WITH THE LEGAL COUNSEL SHOULD B E HANDLED THROUGH THE SAC. END ۱۰ HOLD ”
“cial security problem and to avoid serious affect on their morale. b. Legal Jeopardy of Interviewees In category 3b, above, (abuses and improprieties) an important issue is: How can the legal rights of the individual be best protected in cases where U.S. law may have been violate”
“UT IS D ON E AS COOP ER ATIVE GESTURE ALD TO SAFEGUARD SEN SITIVE BUREAU INFORMATION, CONTA CTS WITH THESE FORIE R ENFLOY EES TO BE HALDLE D PERSONALLY BY SAC OR ASAC. IN EVENT THIS NOT FEASIBLE FOR JUST CAUSE, TO BE HANDLED BY A SENIOR SUPERVISOR, LUCUNBENT EXPLOYEES TO BE ADVIS”
“THE FORMER EMPLOYEE MAY, AFTER BEI NG CON TA CTE D B Y S SC STAFF, CONTACT BUREAU'S LEGAL COUN SEL D IVISION BY COLLECT CALL FOR FULL INFORMATION TO ASSIST HIM, INCLUDING OBLIGATIONS AS TO CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMA FBI EMPLOYEE. IT IS EMPHAS TION ACQUIRED AS IZED THAT BUREAU'S O”
“THE FORMER EMPLOYEE MAY, AFTER BEI NG CON TA CTE D B Y S SC STAFF, CONTACT BUREAU'S LEGAL COUN SEL D IVISION BY COLLECT CALL FOR FULL INFORMATION TO ASSIST HIM, INCLUDING OBLIGATIONS AS TO CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMA FBI EMPLOYEE. IT IS EMPHAS TION ACQUIRED AS IZED THAT BUREAU'S O”
“ANE, QUESTIOLS ARE ASKED WHICH RELATE TO JEGSITIVE SUREAU OPERATIONS (SOURCES, METHODS, TECHNIQU ES, THIRD AGENCY RULE, AND ONGOING INVESTIGATIONS), THEY MAY REQUEST THAT AN FOI AGENT BE PRESENT. BUREAU WILL FROVIDE AGENT ON REQUEST OF INTERVIEWEE. AS A FRELUDE TO INTERVIEW, THE ”
“GE THO TACTED AND ALERTED THAT HE (SHE) JIGHT BE APPROACHED BY THE SSC STAFF, SUBJECT MATTER UN KNOW N. THEY SHOULD BE TOLD THAT IN ΤΗΣ EVENT THEY ARE INTERVIEVED AND DURING THE COURSE OF SANE, QUESTIOLS ARE ASKED WHICH RELATE TO JEGSITIVE SUREAU OPERATIONS (SOURCES, METHODS, TEC”
“VE PROCEDURE ALSO APPLIES TO CURRENT EMPLOYEES OF YOUR OFFICE. HOWEVER, CONT ACT WITH THE LEGAL COUN SEL SHOULD BE HANDLED THROUGH TH E SAC. END HOLD NW 65994 Docld:321765”
“G CONT ACTE D BY SSC STAFF, CON TACT BUREAU'S LEGAL COUNSEL DIVI SION BY COLLECT CALL FOR FULL IN FO RMATION TO AS SIST HIM, INCLUDING OBL IGATIONS AS TO CONFIDENTIA LITY OF INFORMATION ACQUIRED AS FBI EMPLOYEE. IT IS EMPHASIZED THAT BUREAU'S OFFER OF ASSISTANCE IS NOT INTENDED T”
“ROCEDURE ALSO APP LIES T O CURRENT EMPLOYEES OF YO UR OFFICE. HOWEVER, CONT ACT WITH THE LEGAL COUNS EL SHOULD BE HANDLED THROUGH THE SAC. END H”
“ACH OF THESE FORMER EMPLOYEES IS TO BE IMMEDIATELY CONTAC TED AND ALE RT ED T HAT HE MIGHT BE APPRO ACHED BY THE SSC STAFF FOR INTERVIEW. THE FORMER EMPLOYEE MAY, AFTER BEING CONTACTED BY SSC STAFF, CONTACT BUREAU'S LEGAL COUNSEL DIVISION BY COLLECT CALL FOR FULL INFORMATION TO A”
“cial security problem and to avoid serious affect on their morale. b. Legal Jeopardy of Interviewees In category 3b, above, (abuses and improprieties) an important issue is: How can the legal rights of the individual be best protected in cases where U.S. law may have been violate”
“sponsor which could cause both embarrassment and possibly, financial hardship to the sponsor and, in turn, substantially hinder the Agency's ability to secure subsequent commercial cover sponsors. 'Turning next to the wishes of a particular officer (either current or retired”
“TO IMPEDE SSC WORK BUT IS DONE AS COOPERATIVE GESTURE ALD TO SAFEGUARD SENSITIVE BUREAU INFORMATION , CONTACTS WITH THESE FORIER ENFLOYEES TO BE HALDLED PERSONALLY BY SAC OR ASAC. IN EVENT THIS NOT FEASIBLE FOR JUST CAUSE, TO BE HANDLED BY A SENIOR SUPERVISOR, LUCUNBENT EXPLOYEES”
“A. PAGE TWO TACTED AND ALERTED THAT HE (SHE) MIGHT BE APPROACHED BY THE SSC STAFF, SUBJECT MATTER UN KNOWN. THEY SHOULD BE TOLD THAT IN THE EVENT THEY ARE INTERVIEWED AND DURING THE COURSE OF SAME, QUESTIONS ARE ASKED WHICH RELATE TO SENSITIVE BUREAU OPERATIONS (SOURCES, METHODS,”
“S WITH FORMER EMPLOYEES MUST BE IN KEEPING WITH OUR PLEDGE. IT IS BELIEVED SUCH A PROCEDURE WOULD IN SURE PROPER PROTECTION AND ALSO FACILITATE THE WORK OF THE SSC. THE ABOVE PROCEDURE ALSO APPLIES TO CURRENT EMPLOYEES OF YOUR OFFICE. HOWEVER, CONTACT WITH THE LE”
“G CONTACTED BY SSC STAFF, CONTACT BUREAU'S LEGAL COUNSEL DIVISION BY COLLECT CALL FOR F ULL I NF ORM ATION TO ASSIST HIM, INCLUDING OBLIGATIONS AS TO CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMA FBI EMPLOYEE. IT IS EMPHAS TION ACQUIRED AS IZE D T HAT BUREAU'S OFFER OF ASSISTANCE IS NOT INTENDED TO”
“G CONTACTED BY SSC STAFF, CONTACT BUREAU'S LEGAL COUNSEL DIVISION BY COLLECT CALL FOR F ULL I NF ORM ATION TO ASSIST HIM, INCLUDING OBLIGATIONS AS TO CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMA FBI EMPLOYEE. IT IS EMPHAS TION ACQUIRED AS IZE D T HAT BUREAU'S OFFER OF ASSISTANCE IS NOT INTENDED TO”
“THE SSC, THE BUREAU FREQUENTLY LEARNS FROM THE SSC OR OTH ER WISE THAT FORMER EMPLOYEES ARE B EI NG CONSIDERED FOR INTERVIEW BY THE SSC STAFF. INSTRUCTIONS ARE ISSUED FOR THE FIELD OFFICE TO CONTACT THE FORMER EMPLOYEE TO ALERT HIM AS TO POSSIBLE INTERVIEW, REMIND HIM OF HIS CONF”
“ESE FORMER ENFLOYEES IS TO DE IMMEDIATELY CON- 62-2854-6 NW 65994 Docld:32989498 Page 18 یکند T OYOT ASTE PAGE THO TACTED AND ALERTED THAT HE (SHE) JIGHT BE APPROACHED BY THE SSC STAFF, SUBJECT MATTER UNKNOWN. THEY SHOULD BE TOLD THAT IN ΤΗΣ EVENT THEY ARE INTERVIEVED AND DURING ”
“. SET OUT BELOW ARE NAMES AND LAST KNOWN ADDRESSES OF FORMER BUREAU EMPLOYEES AND OFFICE OF ASSIGNME NT OF INCUMBENTS, ALL OF WHOM SSC HAS INQU IRED ABOUT.”
“oversight committees. In addition, if one of these relationships became public, it must be recognized that there will be allegations that the law has been violated. On balance, it is my view that these consi derations are not so significant as to warrant a termi nation of ”
“EING CONTACTED BY SSC STAFF, CONTACT BUREAU'S LEGAL COUNSEL DIVISION BY COLLECT CALL FO R FULL INFOR MATION TO ASSIST HIM INCLUDING OBLIGATIONS AS TO CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION ACQUIRED AS FBI EMPLOYEE. IT IS EMPHASIZED THAT BUREAU'S OFFER OF ASSISTANCE IS NOT INTENDED TO IMP”
“es primarily to apprise the employee of his or her dilemma. OGC will request further advice from the Attorney General. V. Should the most pessimistic development come to pass, the situation will be more political than legal. The fact is that time is of the essence, and any stretc”
“C ES, METHODS, TECHNIQUES, THIRD AGENCY RULE, AND ONGOING I NVE STIGATIO NS) , THEY MAY R EQU EST TH AT AN FBI AGENT BE PRESENT. BUREAU WILL PROVIDE AGENT ON REQUEST OF INTERVIEWEE. AS A PRELUDE TO INTERVIEW, THE FORMER EMPLOYEE MAY, AFTER BEING CONTACTED BY SSC STAFF, CONTACT BU”
“OR OTHERWISE THAT FORMER EMPLOYEES ARE BEING CONSIDERED FOR INTERVIEW BY THE SSC STAFF. INSTRUCTIONS ARE ISSUED FOR THE FIELD OFFICE TO CONTACT THE FORMER EMPLOYEE TO ALERT HIM AS TO POSSIBLE INTERVIEW, REMIND HIM OF HIS CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT WITH THE BUREAU AND SUGGEST THAT ”
“THAT AN FBI AGENT BE PRESENT. BUREAU WILL PROVIDE A GENT ON REQUEST OF INTERVIEWEE. A S A PRELUDE TO INTERVIEW, THE FORMER EMPLOYEE MAY, AFT ER BEING CONTACTED BY SSC STAFF, CONTACT BUREAU'S LEGAL COUNSEL DIVISION BY CO LLECT CALL FO R FULL INFORMATION TO ASSIST HIM, INCLUDING OB”
“GENCY RULE, AND ONGOING INVESTIGATIO NS), THEY MAY REQUE ST THAT A N FBI AGENT BE PR ESENT. BUREAU W ILL PROVIDE AGENT ON REQUEST OF INTERVIEWEE. AS A PRELUDE TO INTERVIEW, THE FORMER EMPLOYEE MAY, AFTER BEI NG CONTACTED BY SSC STAFF, CONTACT BUREAU'S LEGAL COUNSEL DIVISION BY CO”
“GENCY RULE, AND ONGOING INVESTIGATIO NS), THEY MAY REQUE ST THAT A N FBI AGENT BE PR ESENT. BUREAU W ILL PROVIDE AGENT ON REQUEST OF INTERVIEWEE. AS A PRELUDE TO INTERVIEW, THE FORMER EMPLOYEE MAY, AFTER BEI NG CONTACTED BY SSC STAFF, CONTACT BUREAU'S LEGAL COUNSEL DIVISION BY CO”
“INTERVIEWED BY THE SSC, THE BUREAU FREQUENTLY LEARNS FROM THE SSC OR OTHERWISE THAT FORMER EMPLOYEES ARE BEI”
“ENFLOYEES J US T BE IN KEEPING WITH OUR F LEDG E. IT IS BELIEVED SU CH A FROCEDUR E WO ULD INSUR E P ROPER FROTECTION AND A LSO FACILITATE THE WORK OF THE SSC. THE ABOVE FROCEDURE ALSO APF LIES TO CURRENT EMPLOYEES OF YOUR O FFICE. HOWEVER, C”
“, HE SHOULD BE IN ST RUCED TO CONTACT LEGAL COUNSEL, FBIHQ, BY COLLECT CALL. YOUR CONVERSAT IONS WIT H FOR MER EMPLOY EES M UST BE IN KEEPING WITH O UR PLEDGE. IT IS BELIEVED SUCH A PR OCED URE WOULD INSURE PROPER PROTECTION AND ALSO FACILITATE THE WOR K OF THE SSC. THE ABOVE PRO”
“. THEY SHOULD BE TOLD THAT IN THE EVENT THEY ARE INTERVIEWED AND DURING THE C OU RS E OF S AM E, QUE STIONS ARE ASKED WHICH RELATE TO SENSITIVE BUREAU OPERATIONS (SOURCES, METHODS, TECHNIQUES, THIRD AGENCY RULE, AND ONGOING INVESTIGATIONS), THEY MAY REQUEST THAT AN FBI AGENT BE P”
“. THEY SHOULD BE TOLD THAT IN THE EVENT THEY ARE INTERVIEWED AND DURING THE C OU RS E OF S AM E, QUE STIONS ARE ASKED WHICH RELATE TO SENSITIVE BUREAU OPERATIONS (SOURCES, METHODS, TECHNIQUES, THIRD AGENCY RULE, AND ONGOING INVESTIGATIONS), THEY MAY REQUEST THAT AN FBI AGENT BE P”
“UBMITTING TO INTERVIEWS BY REPRESENTATIVES OF CON- GRESSIONAL COMMITTEES. THE NECES SITY OF SECURING THIS AP- PROVAL IS PROMPTED BY THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT ALL EMPLOYEES HAVE SIG NED. YOU WERE ADVISED THAT CONGRESSIONAL STAFF MEMBERS WERE CONDUCTING INTERVIEWS OF FORMER AND/OR C”
“ES WHICH HAVE NOT PREVIOUS LY HAD C URRENT OR F ORME R EMPL OYEES IN ITS TERRITOY INTERVIEWED BY THE SSC, THE BUREAU FREQUENTLY LEAR NS FROM THE SSC OR OTHERWISE THAT FORMER EMPLOYEES ARE BEING CONSI DERED FOR INTERVIEW BY THE SSC STAFF. INSTRUCTIONS ARE ISSUED FOR THE FIELD OFFI”
“EMPLOYEE MAY, AFTER B EI NG CONTACTED BY SSC STAFF , C ON TACT BUR EA U'S LEGAL COUN SEL D IV IS IO N BY COLLECT CALL FOR FULL INFORMATION TO ASSIST HIM, INCLUDING OBLIGAT IONS AS TO CO NF ID EN TI AL ITY OF IN FOR MA FBI EM PLO YEE . I T I S E MPH AS TION ACQUIRED AS IZED THAT B”