“English was completely adequate for purposes of polygraph testing. Subject was completely cooperative in all respects. Subject displayed no evasiveness and appeared to be completely frank whenever he was questioned or gave information on a topic. The following relevant ques”
“nt of the KGB; 2. Whether Subject had intentionally given Mr. Solie any false information. PROCEDURE Subject was given a polygraph examination on 2 August 1968 at a safesite in the vicinity of Washington, D.C. The examination was conducted in the English language. Subject's compr”
“152 HT C 5/ ., 00 DNLY * CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY . WASHINGTON 25, D.C 19! ■ , OffICE Of DEPUTY DIRECTOR Of CENTRAL INTELUGENCE CM Man de . : 12 February 1964 HENORANDUN FOR: teexed c United States Intelligence Board Members. SUsJctsi.m Yuri Ivanovich NOSENK”
“1 1-00000 1U/ 05294 .• CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY WASHINGTON 25 0 C 9 OFFICE OF DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELUCENCE 12 February 1964 NEORANDUN FOR: United Statas Intelligence Board Members SUBJECT: ‘‘. Yuri Ivanovich NOSENKO 1. This memorandum refers to the Stat”
“14-00000 or specuw* INTRODUCTION The following summary and analysis is not intended to be all inclusive, that is to contain a specific comment on all organi- zational, operational, personality and case type information furnished by Yuriy Ivanovich NOSENKO. To attempt ”
“14-00000 orpye onbnbl 1 October 196S MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Security 7 FROM : Deputy Chief, Security Research Staff SUBJECT : NOSENKO, Yuriy Ivanovich 1. In accordance with the request of the Deputy Director of Central Intelligence, attached is a summary with c”
“14-00000 643 € January 1975 SUBJECT: Yuriy Ivanovich NOSENKO 1. Information that NOSENKO had defected and was in the United States in February 1964 was known to appropriate agencies and articles had appeared in the public media. 2. NOSENKO was in the United States u”
“14-00000 Operational Memo # N-4 SUBJECT: NOSENKO, Yuri Ivanovich The following is a typed copy of a handwritten memorandum furnished by Subject on 1 November 1967, following a request on 31 October 1967: ' . What were the motif and the reasons which have led me to the”
“pertinent ques tions and was accused of being a dispatched agent. Subject's only explanation to [my] direct accusation was that he could not be a dispatched agent because of the amount of information he had volun teered to American Intelligence. “Subject, who before and t”
“1 4-00000 SEUKE: PREVIOUS CONCLUSIONS RE NOSENKO AS CONTAINED ON PAGES 357 - 360 OF "THE EXAMINATION OF THE BONA FIDES OF A KGB DEFECTOR" The following is a quote of the previous conclusions in the case of Yuriy Ivanovich NOSENKO. (The specific conclusions have been g”
“14-00000 187 til ,EYES CNLY CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY WASHINGTON 25, O C. OFFICE or DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELUCENCE 1 12 February 1964 NEORANDUN FOR: United States Intelligence Board Members SUSJSCT1 . Yuri Ivanovich NOSENKO 1. This memorandum refers to the”
“Top Secret [ (FOUNDATIONS OF NOSENKO'S CLAIMS) CIA while at the same time the CIA has penetrated the KGB. From this moment, I do not conceal this fact, I began to feel afraid that the KGB would somehow learn of my contact with you. This article deeply 'interested' the KGB”
“14-00000 - .titd UNL1 • ’C-NTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY /% WASHINGTON 25. D. C. (3, OFFICE OF DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELUGENCE 12 February 1964 NEHORANDUM FOR: United States Intelligence Board Members SUBJECT Yuri Ivanovich NOSENKO - .1. This memorandum refers to”
“14-00000 Operational Memo # N-4 0.: & 1 SUBJECT: NOSENKO, Yuri Ivanovich The following is a typed copy of a handwritten memorandum U furnished by Subject on 1 November 1967, following a request on A 31 October 1967;. ' - What were the motif and the reasons which have le”
“14-00000 SECRET PREVIOUS CONCLUSIONS RE NOSENKO AS CONTAINED ON PAGES 357 - 360 OF "THE EXAMINATION OF THE BONA FIDES OF A KGB DEFECTOR" The following is a quote of the previous conclusions in the case of Yuriy Ivanovich NOSENKO. (The specific conclusions have been gi”
“14-00000 e .TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction :II. Summary of Developments in NOSENKO Case Since 30 October 1967 Analytical Comments Concerning the Bona Fides of Yuriy Ivanovich NOSENKO A. Is NOSENKO Identical to the Person Whom He Claims to be? B. Is the Claimed”
“14-00000 y • TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction II. Summary of Developments in NOSENKO Case Since .30 October 1967 III. Analytical Comments Concerning the Bona Fides of Yuriy Ivanovich NOSENKO A. Is NOSENKO Identical to the Person Whom He Claims to be? 1 B. Is the”
“14-00000 TSP. C. ET 0/0300 LYE) une. : 9 CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY WASHINGTON 25, 0.0 ., OFFICE of DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE 4 . - Jo it February 1964 MEMORANDUM FOR: 3 United States Intelligence Board Members. h’IM V.Tcohr, ": - *4 : :: - -7 • SUB”
“14-00000 andvi—■ *3 Pol ( « ElEdU Y Euro 0) 11 February 1954 MEMORANDUM FOR: *r. McGeorge Buady SUBJECT: Yuri Ivanovich NOSENKO 1. This memorandum refers to the State Department release of 10 February on subject case and provides addi- tional background as well as”
“IF". .: u-v.— 1 October 1968 MEMORANDUM FOR: Director of Security FROM : Deputy Chief, Security Research Staff SUBJECT . : NOSENKO, Yuriy Ivanovich / 1. In accordance with the request of the Deputy Director .of Central Intelligence, attached is a summary with conclus”
“14-00000 SECRET SUMMARY OF DEVELOPMENTS IN NOSENKO CASE SINCE 30 OCTOBER 1967 Since 30 October 1967, interviews with Yuriy Ivanovich NOSENKO have been conducted by one individual not previously known personally to NOSENKO but who has been aware of the NOSENKO case sin”
“14-00000 SECRET ,sornt-nritt-wD-nodMSM ANA LY TICAL COMMENTS CONCERNING THE BONA FIDES OF YURIY IVANOVICH NOSENKO As indicated in the introduction to this summary, information in regard to Yuriy Ivanovich NOSENKO will be considered against an arbi trary but realisti”
“14-00000 * A January 1975 269 SUBJECT: Yuriy Ivanovich NOSENKO 1. Information that NOSENKO had defected and was in the United States in February 1964 was known to appropriate agencies and articles had appeared in the public media. 2. NOSENKO was in the United States ”
“displayed no evasiveness and appeared to * be completely frank whenever he was questioned or gave information on a topic. The following relevant questions were asked during the first test; Is your true name Yuriy Ivanovich NOSENKO? Yes. Were you born in the year 1927? Yes. ”
“said in the KGB about him and the sort of person they were trying to make him out to be (that he was morally degraded, that he had descended and sunk into a swamp) that all this was nonsense, bluff, and chatter. And PENKOVSKIY, the same as GOLITSYN, gave me a feeling of grea”
“14-00000 1 Top Secret (FOUNDATIONS OF NOSENKO’S CLAIMS) If the defections of [former KGB officers] PETROV, RASTVOROV and DERYABIN passed without evoking any particular thoughts, the defection to the United States of GOLITSYN, whom I had heard of as an intelligent person”
“14-00000 ■ ■ TOP SECRET , . EYES ON.Y- 11 February 1354 MEMORANDUM FOR: Mr. McGoorga Bundy SUBJECT: Yuri Ivanovich NOSENKO 1. This monorandun refers to the State Department release of 10 February on subject case and provides addi tional background as well as informati”
“0- 7/08 SECRET I. PREFACE 1 A. Purpose of Paper This paper has been prepared to compare the results of the 1967-68 interrogations of YURI NOSENKO with a CIA paper dated February, 1968, entitled ”The Examination of the Bona Fides of a KGB Defector." This CIA paper was bas”
“( If —- S-PC -> YosenRo AccouneDIsputeS harge y oulEL MBITAD SZULO-2’5 Defection.- Preceded - Repdri Service; ; Officials. off the State 4.3 spchitozh-Ne.Yorx Tmensen vol*o--vud Department, the Central. In- • WASHINGTON, Febaitss to- Swis“ Police, Apparently. Immigration ta”
“to make them look foolish; although invited to do so, he was not able to suggest any changes of fact or presenta tion which would make them more accurate. Commenting on the use of interrogation reports, NOSENKO said on 4 March 1965: "My life story is absolutely correct. Anyt”
“1 4-00000 % - - TOP ut 890 ■—,1 Ci EYES SHU ■ II February 1954 MEMORANDUM FOR: Mr. McGoorga Bundy SUBJECT: Yuri Ivanovich NOSENKO 1. This memorandum refers to the State Department al release of 10 February on subject case and provides addi- tional background as well”
“1 Top Secret 21 Introduction 81 The judgment of NOSENKO’s bona fides entailed the distillation of the huge volume of counterintelligence information assembled in connection with his case, including the product of,his lengthy interrogations, the analysis of KGB operations ”
“14-00000 if ( 10th January 1975 SUBJECT: Yuriy Ivanovich NOSENKO 1. Information that NOSENKO had defected and was in the United States in February 1964 was known to appropriate agencies and articles had appeared in the public media. 2. NOSENKO was in the United States”
“my family, That's all. But I feel that not only the government is making mistakes. I feel that there are faults throughout the entire system of socialism. What I mean is that things are bad in Czechoslovakia, things are bad in Po land, things are bad with KADAR (in Hungary),”
“14-00000 SFPSC7 0uvf. 02 046 : Ay-ceavo i Yurily Ivanovich NOSENKO NOSENKO is a Soviet intelligence officer who defected in Switzerland in 1964. He was subsequently brought to the U.S., and after a short period of relative freedom, he was confined under strict and r”
“14-00000 a REDDEST — I, Yuriy Ivanovich Nosenko, request the Covernent of the United States of America to grant me political asylwi in the United States of America. This decision has been taken by ne as the result of considering this question over the course of several”
“14-00000 SECRET. D. Is the information furnished by NOSENKO to CIA concerning -- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- - ”
“14-00000 f D. During the period 1955-1960, he was neither a senior case officer in, nor Deputy Chief of, the Seventh Department American-British Commonwealth Section. E. NOSENKO was neither Deputy Chief of the American Embassy Section nor a senior officer or supervi”
“originated with his distaste and hatred for the Soviet regime in general, with his desire to obtain revenge for the unjust death of his father, a senior official in the Soviet shipbuilding industry, and with the general admiration of the Americans with whom ho had come in con”
“iques used to date. We expect to complete this line of questioning by 28 October. 4. Thi s first pha se has enabled us to confirm our analyses of key aspects of this case. More important is the fact that NOSENKO knows he is reacting in sensitive. areas and this is worrying him be”
“The only facts he challenged strongly were incontestably true, such as the date of GOLITSYN’s defection, the date of ABIDIAN’s visit to the Pushkin Street dead drop, KOSO- LAPOV's travel separate from JENNER, and KOSOLAPOV's November 1960 trip to Helsinki. It seemed at all ti”
“this instance the Second Chief Directorate) upon which there previously had been relatively little inside • information. Moreover, in the absence of direct evidence from other sources, it would be arbitrarily confining if an assumption were not made that certain KG3 standards”
“judgments, if correct, rebut presumptive evidence of. NOSENKO’s bona fides. The contradictions in NOSENKO ‘s accounts of his life and KGB service are so extensive as to make his claims as a whole unacceptable. While truth and fact in this case frequently cannot be establishe”
“direction. 2. Other areas of strong reaction refer to Subject's suspected contact with th e KGB whi le in Geneva in 1962 and 1964 and to Abidian and the Pushkin Street drop (key factor in the PENKOVSKIY compromise). Subject became very upset at questioning on this subject and ref”
“30000 QEODET oLUNLI ANALY TICAL COMMENTS CONCERNING THE BONA FIDES OF YURIY IVANOVICH NOSENKO As indicated in the introduction to this summary, information in regard to Yuriy Ivanovich NOSENKO will be considered against an arbi trary but realistic list of areas cons”
“14-00000 SECRET MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD SUBJECT: Yuriy Ivanovich NOSENKO / In early or mid-1967, the Agency General Counsel was provided a summary of the Nosenko case. The memorandum sought an advisory opinion from the General Counsel on the Agency’s legal basis for i”
“—the circumstances. They may-make mo.come ‘In that case we can meet. Case . You know that I would not bring any pressure. Officer: That's something we understand because we are .. both in this business. You and I are in the :same business, so you can't— NOSENKO: Let me inte”
“14-00000 SECRET MEMORANDUM FOR THE RECORD SUBJECT: Yuriy Ivanovich NOSENKO / In early or mid-1967, the Agency General Counsel was provided a summary of the Nosenko case. The memorandum sought an advisory opinion from the General Counsel on the Agency’s legal basis for i”
“14-00000 )/.‘/a Yur i 1 y_I vanovi ch NOSENKO IDENTIFICATION: NOSENKO, Yurily Ivanovich, a Soviet KGB officer who defected in 1964 and was subsequently involuntarily con fined in the U.S. by the Agency for a period of approximately three years. BACKGROUND NOSENKO firs”
“1 4-00000 cannot be established with certainty, it is evident that truth and fact are not what NOSENKO relates. By almost any test, virtually any of NOSENKO’s above claims are impugned by fact or probability. or contradicted or retracted in his own statements. NOSENKO is ”