“what they were
doing, "and just how far my neck is stack out". IDEM A learned they had
checked into a local motel. He called IDEN G and passed on this information.
IDEN G was relieved, but asked IDEN h to keep an eye on them and report
their movements to him. Subsequently, wh”
“14-00000
D. rd the
- early evening ?I* CO:4. 1 ro.t42’
possibility th a no L the • as oval: .3 *: -insyeeze* 113
approached ss
givity; him a‘ from 20 or pair on me about s family’s •
future if he vommined in 412 .oo a :. 30c:0erg voted asserances
that the U. Sovemmens mo.”
“DAkate wad
a prisoner
the mother of IDANBRUNT, no 8 being held
a foral vernment. is mother M sent a cable
ED DER son asking how he is. hether ho needs anything, inquiring
If there 10 thing she aa do for him. and asking him please
communicate with her. She is now avsitinz an”
“ACCOMP LISHMENTS CLAIMED NONE ACQUIT- CASE HAS BEEN:
CON VIC. AUTO. FUG. FINES 1 SAVINGS RECOVERIES TALS
PENDING OVER ONE YEAR YES NO
A ‘ PENDING PROSECUTION
21-PH OVER SIX MONTHS YES NO
■.1 SPECIAL AGENT
APPROVED 1 IN CHARGE DO NOT WRITE IN SPACES BELOW
24.91 REC 83
C”
“dr. NT %/ch 2 8: 0-47
ATTORNEY R BIN WROTE A LETTER TO THE STATE ATTORNEY 0
CHARGING A WATERGATE TYPE COVERUP IN THE CASE.ANDNm
DEMANDING WARRANTS BE ISSUED OR INFORMATIONS (sic) FILED
AGAINST LESNIK AND ALVAREE WITHIN 24 HOURS. .
. "I THINK BOTH RUBIN AND MARTINEZ ARE TWO PUB”
“21 that he was going to kill himself if they sent him home.
■ 22 il You told us that he slashed his wrists and two .psychiatrists i
13 examined him and both found him mentally unstable.
245 Mr. Nosenko. .Right.
0:GI
pe*
Mr. Klein. What was the point of having the two
7”
“OF MIAMI,
FLORIDA - VICTIM
DATE
12/13/63
REPORT MADE BY
INVESTIGATIVE PERIOD
10/7
-
12/9/63
TYPED BY
JOHN P. LENIHAN
CHARACTER OF CASE
ITSP; MF; ITAR - EXTORTION
(ACCOUNTING AND FRAUD SECTION)
:bjc
REFERENCES
-
:
Reports of SA JOHN P. LENIHAN dated 8/31/63, and 10/11/63, at Miami”
“14-00000
I
A
/
range "or PE exposition te 3i — lor fucta and At the sere
time persuade e1 i-
sis to cor-it him to
ast-blie-ment ( zvy IT-TKNG/3 ther
SUIT: sted r better expos: i Ox ir Mo-tvonl. Coneda
where he 5e3 contact vith a rerso who roule eover-o natters for 6”
LIRING-3·p. 89·source: semanticDerived signal60%THE ITKIN CASE
“photographed every boat in the Key West harbor, and it was apparent to
IDEN A he was LNCOLZ.AR- involved. Later, IDEN F approached IDEN A and said
£2 IMPDET CL BY 011668
nn”
“abused as she bore scars and
marks on her arms and face. Galina told Jaffe that after
she left him she went to telephone for assistance. As she
was leaving the telephone from which she made the call to the
. police, she was accosted by two men. She immediately resisted
‘effo”
“investigator would do in the investi
gation of,& lawyer would be to check on his admission to the Bar and
with the Grievance Committee; that anybody could have gotten this.
Further, I inquired whether he had any information to the effect that
assisted Grunewald in the invest”
“14-00000
*E:L ,
RIDPdij 15
25
Nov 21
2 stMM%/ L..
8000
PAGE 2 JMVAVE 0156 S E CRET
FERNANDEZ AND HAROLD VITLING, THE DEFENSE COUNSEL, BBT
VAS GRANT ED BY THE JUDGE.
'HE RILED THAT IF THE DEFENSE WAS ABLE TO SHOW, OUT OF
THE JURY’S PRESENCE, THAN AN ANSWER FAVORABLE ”
“undersigned is informed that at no time prior to the
19 sentencing of defendant were the matters set forth in Exhibits A and B
20 of the attached affidavits brought to the Court’s attention. It is the belief
21 of the undersigned that had these matters been brought to the Cour”
“cision) until, he was seen by the case officer in Novem-
ber, 1964."
NW 50955 DocId: 32423539 Page 61”
“that he ■
had checked ou t of the motel and left no forwarding address.
December 20, 1962 to January 22, 1963 00
On November 25, 1963, EP T-2 made available clinical
records regarding the subject covering the period when the
subject was a patient at theVeteransAdministrati”
“The Attorney General
The informant was told that his offer Is outside
a|
our jur1Ediction, which he acknowledged. No commitments were ■
made to him. At this time, we do not plan to further pursue
the matter. Our relationship with him has been most carefully
guarded and we woul”
“feelings not in fact true and
that his case receiving consideration highest levels.. (emphasis added)?"
"With this problem which had undoubtedly been bothering Amlash con-
* The files do not accurately identify these case officers.
and III , however, were the principal case ”
“Air Police had the "Hangar 34
Aron" blocked off two blocks in either direction.
12. TOCHENSKY met me outside the building and informed me thet
immediately after take-off subject’s nix-year-old daughter had become
extremely airsick and suffered respiratory difficulties, she wa”
“-9
r
& %
e •
0
NK 89-56
2. On May 4, 1972, Assistant United States Attorney
(AUSA) JOSEPH AUDINO; Camden, New Jersey, advised that a
trial date has not been set in this matter. He stated that
he thinks it will be handled in the Fall of 1972.
I
!
sx
NW 88321 Do”
“4-00000
EVES UNLY
can be determined, cietisih "fronted" for all arrangements.
11. Security Office investigation conducted variously from
. through 17 Septemberyl(1959 off
25. May Fo-moorreflected no sub.
scantive derogatory information germane to the case.
TVEQ 27
L(L)”
“’’Approximately one week later I was instructed by s.
83 » • this same person to either participate as previously agreed **
;a 1 or derrogatory information pertaining to me would be disclosed to
* to the Federal Bureau of Investigation. Thereupon I agreed,
to follow the instr”
“where we met twice previously and after some
waiting and phoning he looked at his notebook and realized that he.
was at the wrong place. He apologized. Then, Subject stated that he
had to return the Boneville and take another car and he asked 2 toA
have a ride with him. Subje”
“1 a.fine of $10,000.00 for Count Six, and two years imprisonment to run.
2 concurrently with Count Six and a fine of $10,000.00 for each of Counts
3 Sixteen, Seventeen and Eighteen of the Indictment, and one year imprisonment
4 to run concurrently with Count One and a fine of ”
“psychiatrist, to conduct
• .such examination, to be committed to the Federal Correctional
Institution, La Tuna, Texas, for a period not exceeding two weeks. is.
• M.
.° "On November 4, 1963, the court nullified that part sy
eobp
% of the aforesaid order, pertaining to the ”
“€
New York will continue to make efforts to locate
a source suitable for assignment and Boston and the Bureau
will be advised if such an informant is located. C.
tvwAh---/
€
"j
f.
pfon-titree /
:”
“New York State, Second Department - December 1967
United States District Court for the Southern and Eastern
Districts of New York
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit
NW 88326
Docl:32243311 Page 27”
“13-00000
crantatieseouinensinnlisie-k
"The
EP 65-951
■ to participate in a psychiatric consultation and/or examination.
‘I believe that this is a violation of my right to a speedy trial
as guaranteed to me by Amendment 6 of the Constitution.
. . "In relation to the foreg”
“for reinterview; however, it was determined that he •,
had checked out of the motel and left no forwarding address..
December 20, 1962 to January 22, 1963."""""”.*****
:1> * On November 25, 1963, EP T-2 made available clinicals
records regarding the subject covering the peri”
“nt by subject at COLLINS home at Lake Ariel, Pa.
It is not recommended that INS be furnished the
INS
details of the interviews conducted with SUENICHOLS,
because if this is done it will set a precedente for possible
demand for information furnished Bureau by KARBOWSKI and
COLLINS”
“., where it was
observed that there were two letters and a package on the hall
table addressed to
ER
IC S. or E. GALT. The package was
postmarked 4/1/63, and the letters were postmarked 4/9 and
4/10/68. CARIER advised his sister, ROBBIE LEE CARINER, a
school teacher who resides i”
“about going to work like any normal person and fiddle with
his inventions at night. C. 0. reminded him that if he had
not been able to come up with a successful invention after
1 1/2 years of our patronage he should get bis head out of the
clouds and join the rest of us. By t”
“Deposition of John See Iso, 5/16/78, p. 26.
533/ HSCA Deposition of Herbert Manell, 4/28/78, p. 36.
534/ See above. Cf. "Foul Foe’ manuscript, pp. 268-269.
535/ HSCA Deposition of Barbara Manell, 4/28/78, p. 52.
536/ HSCA Deposition of Alan White, 5/18/78, p. 26-28.
537/ Ibi”
“bus. He intercepted the PAA employee and took the bag and drove it
book to the plans. He later told up he opened the bag, one of the
,flight bag variety, and on his own initiative examined the contents.
It contained items of apparel used by ladies that will not be further
ide”
“-21- 41
M- can think of that would be of any help to us, to aid us
we would appreciate it. We would like to get to the bottom
of it >
S - Because this has happened so quickly, it is hard for us /to
keep it in our mind, the garble that Tinker
wrote down. Do you know the rel”
“especially .
,. the trouble involving the F.B.I. and some shooting event. He’
•; *was presented before the Psychiatric stand andat first was .‘
. somewhat reluctant to answer; questions and when asked a question • •
that was not due to his liking he would relate ‘this is my .”
“6
•- STATE OF CALIFORNIA
no.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES
?
being by me Kras duly sworn, deposes and mays: that 4 to cd
eP
in the above entitled action; that he has ‘sead the forc Groden 1
and knoms the consent thereof: „nd that the uemel krie oil--*----*-- efepe dib as mast”
“reported one incident as follows: "So rapid were PHONE’s movements,
that when he net a friend of his, he hardly paused to speak with him,
just waved him off". The second surveillant: "No, it didn't look like
that at all, to me. To me it looked like this Indian-looking person
”
“convictions at El Paso, Texas, which the official
spokesmen and - the press have so neatly labeled as being for "bank robbery," let one of
.the government's own spurious records, the appelate court decision that finally yawned a
judgement of acquittal in my case, give its vers”
“violation of his civil rights. He raved on that
he was well aware of the law and demanded that the FBI . ..
investigate the judge involved.. y
- Subject was informed of the provisions of the -
Civil Rights Statutes and told that he should discuss this'
case with the United ”
“further believe that I am being coerced into ' ,
, , taking psychiatric examination and/or consultation by the '
OS resulting undue delay in bringing me to trial.””7.
"I have read this statement consisting of this and
3 other pages, and it is true and correct...--
4.
Set ai”
“Was Behind Ud Harvey nw^ ^ Republic, 22 February 1964
'.'•^ Letter, 10 October 1964, p. 227. McBirnie, Dr. W. • ------------------
MacDonald, Dwight. "That Onwaid PAEGralE - - Case.”
“effective when he gets
property. being beaten. Kim’s right forearm a copy of grand jury testimony |
■ These charges stem from an in was busted by a pis who slamed during the trial. ' :
cident that happened On October a cast iron door ’on it, IndJerome "He can neither properly”
“13-00000
cbustit.istatt
C
EP 65-951
time he looks depressed, but sometimes angry. He wrote many
letters about different subjects and some of these, it seems,
We emanate from a patient who is under the effect of a depressive
avfeeling. TheThe patient
patientwas transferr”
“13-00000
%
O
di
-•
.4.
ar
'I *
/I In my conversation with Tobin, he advised that there was
,
information over in the Senate similar to that furnished by Grunewald.
I asked him where in the Senate and he said it cane out of Senator
MoCarran’s Office. Inasmuch asb”
“and according
to GANIGR, CALT did not arrive at this location until April 5,.
1988. GALT said he
wa
s unable to explain this, and had no
idea how this could cecur,
-
GANKER was also questioned concerning the possibility
-
14th Street,
that GALT or any other roomers had left mater”
“November 11, 1975 at 9:00 a.m. in this court and,
25 further, that all costs and fees in relation to the attendance:
26 said witnesses shall be borne by the United States under the
27 provisions of the Criminal Justice Act.
28 DATED: OCT 221975_
20
30 BY: GORDON THOMPSON J”
“This was
objected to by attorney Robert Thaller, prosecutor in the case. The judge
sustained the objection and MacVane did not have to answer the question.
Asos finished his questioning and Thaller began a short cross examination.
Thaller asked if MacVane ever heard Merola me”
“14-00000, -T
/
•3/3 koton:
6. Ro.zou 4
Co er roach in the
werko: of Ge a Creek busi
a p. live at
C. 3s:S G0 ubject's wife
her ( a - %01 as refutes).
, feelin: o present ospect to ub.
to je for the
.7 v :C ..]. uo owned or
shots
7
telus !:
.2 ect
■"1 approach Dr”
LIRING-3·p. 172·source: semanticDerived signal57%THE ITKIN CASE
“CORPORATION WAS UNDERGOING A GRAND JURY
INVESTIGATION IN BUFFALO, NEW YORK,
5. THE PURPOSE OF LAWYERS HEADLEY AND SUDDUTH IN
CONTACTING WKSCARLET -3 WAS 10 OFFER go ys$±0;0n0 TO PRESSURE
. • • •. a se. . v o-
—: : : secr-tt.'-”
“decided to go to Michigan to scek work, ANDERSON,
who was a motel employee, indicated he was got to
Michigan
with CALT and hoped to obtain employment as a wolder's helper.
GARMER recalled he refunded approximately $17 to AIDENSON, who
had paid two weeks in advance on registering ”