“ACTION THIS CASE UNTIL ADVISED. MOF DID NOT QUESTION THIS RATIONALE AND PROMISED TO COMPLY. wa Dw 3. PLS IDENTIFY CARE? MENTIONED PARA 2.REF. SECRET * SECRET”
“motley group of cases remaining after completion of the detailed sections of the previous summary. Included are First Department and Seventh Department cases covering a period of approxi mately five and one-half years. It should be noted, however, that the • 2 OU/4/ 4”
“ake The resicet. of Suck step was docutiofe cutifoofer weighing all foreters in the wor confetty aud we felt that HEWIRELESS. concluding that the hey to the solution acting in his ocon behalf. t A NW 65924 Docld:32349378 Page 3”
“hat this would not be necessary. He returned our exhibits and told us to consider the matter closed. NW 65990 Docld:32392257 Page 9”
“reasons for conclusion (b) Statement as to whether information furnished coincides‘ [ substantially with other available information 29 8-13-70 NW 88321 Docld:32989529 Page 2011 *”
“meeting and the testimony about its significance on the issue of authorization is discussed in detail in Section 5 (iii), infra. NW 50955 DocId: 32423539 Page 251”
“active and effective socially. The Reviewing Officer concurs in this report. III. Cl '1 6W RATJTAR,3gujumGsASa €”
“1001238 case or cases. There is merit to this contention by 2”
“they do not fall into one or two specific categories. Instead, they constitute a rather motley group of cases remaining after completion of the detailed sections of the previous summary. Included are First Department and Seventh Department cases covering a period of approxi”
“"F.izzature) C. TracyBarnes Concur. Date: C/DO C, Tracy Barnes 2”
“made up regarding the - child. CS COPY 4. LIRING/4, who was not witting of the above action of LInIRG/3, accepted Ait”
“cestenge case or cases. There is merit to this contention by 2 w oronre”
“27, 1971, in this case has been previously reported. 5 NW 88321 Docld:32989529 Page 40”
“WEEK. 4. WE HAVE REVIEWED DOCUMENTS FORWARDED REF B AND GECRET”
“underlying this opinion are too attenuated for the Committee to adopt it as a finding. opia NW 50955 DocId:32423525 Page 168”
“his geguent. Subject W? 1aware of a engy being made as nothing had beon cafd in front of hi ever, when the document was returned to him he fir dforely spelled if there was an odor of copier fluid; he was apporently satisiif - copy had not been made as ho. said nothing and_jus”
“the case will be closed. a -5- XR OLUKEI 0rg “982 -NW-88326-Docld:32989Z04 Page 268”
“were, constantly in my mind as I reviewed the Fourth Evaluation Report. Rather than ignoring its advice, I relied heavily on its comments and.conclusions. 16 NW 50955 DocId: 32424709 Page 137”
“given by some witnesses and documents) were ■ r, n a %: : 00 eassification. 3! 173 6. UUd 0 Gossibed or ^ivation: 20 MAP eater Dotis” 25 SEND Asait NW 48327 DocId:32263889 Page 69”
“found no evidence of conflict of interest. CONFIDENTIAL”
“does not appear that it was handled indiscreetly and. therefore, no administrative action is recommended. 0 A .60 -2- NW 88326_Docld:32989704 Page 156”
“trial. Lack of evidence. JECTother SUBasssd statedthatthis was the only time HE has ever arrested; and that what was mentioned here in. HE has/ never been held, arrested, detained or imprisoned for civil, political or military reasons. ARMAN 75 D O C Pi sano NW 88613 Do”
“NAME AND SIGNATURE do/ i363 DC/LE--------------------------- Roland E. Dulin X BY REVIEWING OFFICIAL ' COMMENTS or REVIEWING OFFICIAL I concur in above assessment. DATE OFFICIAL TITLE OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL TYPED OR PRINTED NAMES AND SIGNATURE 9. • J ADR ........ .....”
“14-00000 CONFIDENTIAL 5. Mr. Strickland of OGC has concurred in these recommendations. A. B. Swider DDO Appeals Officer Attachments: Tab A - References A-C . Tab B - Full Text and Sanitized Versions Tab C - Army Document for Referral -3- CONFIDENTIAL”
“examination, the SUBJECT was re-interrogated concerning his reactions during the above tests. The SUBJECT maintained that he was truthful in his answers. The SUBJECT executed a sworn, It -3- Ni uil”
“of e y/ S reports hande toyasewing 1/11/1/200126 th 15 A Demanded 13. si (> Thooah heJ. Thomy case, D.K., d e they gasran AthuR Deride Dec J Ahaol d Till Herri e O.K. Lost frerend 1N 15. Are shoulIsdcable be sufficient is Es otlohoner fal A D 16. report to You”
“LAY ENOUGH BASIS FOR COURT $. TO ISSUE A SUFOENA DUCES TECUM REQUIRING PRESENCE A WOFACT $. (CONTINUED) CORRDinAtinG oreiczes GNOuP • ANTNESTICATIGG oresc&a CEN 7-31 S EC RET “2h, BE2ss0uct10B ME ES THAN THE ISSUANG OFFICE 66 PRONISITEP. 66 00 Z00V GG 201-426692”
“MAKE DECISION TO AID GOC. AS USUAL W’S VIEWS WERE reproduction by other than suing office is prohibited. larlesnevesan 1”
“significant details, and on the last of which, by independent evidence, Blahut had also lied; 2. Blahut’s actions were deliberate, as evidenced NW 88326 Docld:32269709 Page 108”
“above listed documents many Sum- maries of file reviews, depositions of employees, interviews of employees, etc, are cited in the report. 2001022 Classification: SPA.am/mrem 471 ._% LhtLon, d NW 48327 DocId:32263889 Page 372”
“reads, I would have or would be opposed to it because 24 it provides an exception with the approval of the versight 25 TAnEDET NW 50955 DocId: 32423513 Page 67”
“E TO BE RETAINED. THOSE NOT INDICATED FOR PETENTION ARE AUTHOR. ZED FOR IMMEDATE DESTRUCTION 4. 141c NW 65990 Docld:32404765 Page 2 ☐ CONTINUED ON SEPARATE PAGE 115-30)”
“involved, as by so doing he may cast off suspicion. 9 2-12-60 NW 88321 Docl:32989529 Page 1393." - 84°”
“other operations did go on. NW 50955 DocId:32423630 Page 134”
“were to come down, they would probably have indicated in their 25 report that they had passed this information on. NW 50955 DocId:32202440 Page 41 TA D CECDET”
“he instructed MEROLA at that time to have nothing to do with the matter and he should not handle it. NW 64578 Docld:32332334 Page 3 - 2 -”
“unreliability". However, Subject admitted to the undersigned that the real reason for dismissal CHART %..”
“: WORKING PAPERS HERE THRU GOBERNACION. B. G TOLDET HAD RECEIVED FINE REPORT FROM PGT AND I SO WOULD SECRET : NW 65987 DocId:32409057 Page 6”
“connection with cases captioned: BERNARD S. LEE, Y REC-46 CLARENCE M. KEPA 62-117290-638 ET (U.S.D .C., D.C.) CIVIL ACTION #76-1185 B UF ILE 62-117194 -Bureau (Encs. 14) (1-package) 2-M emphi”
“referred to was marked for identification as 21 22 Hunt Exhibit No. 6) 23 24 25 HW 50955 DocId: 32 202418 Page 26 TAD SECDET”
“PM-NB SELF IN COMMERCIAL ARBITRAT ION 8 CASE B FEB AGAINST STUART FOR HIS FAILURE PAY FULL ROYALTIES DUE HER ON ENGLISH EDITION BOOK. : eln . 3. EASBY HAD LONG SESSION 20 JAN ATTEMPTING PERSUADE HER a f € $ 58 La '. A si”
“DEC MAILING NOTICES AND CHECKS. A 2 3. THE FEW PREVIOUS CASES AS NOTED PARA 3 REF WERE HANDLED OAD HOC BASIS WHEN BROUGHT TO JMWAVE ATTENT ION. NO FIRM PAVO POLICY WAS ESTABLISHED. FURTHER, JMWAVE NOT AWARE ANY COMMITMENTS TO DE PEIDENT S BY WOFACT. 4. RE CASE 59 REF, RE”
“OS does not believe possible to keep arrest from 1.. NW 65990 Docld:32397542 Page 10 48. 23 Νον. 1 : O”
“ect in the CAVBOMB case. He asked LAPORIS how the business was coming, and he replied that they were NW 65994 Docld:32292137 Page 3 2 CV 157-127 :”
“granted no 4/2 . both in the order and our proposed statute, particularly in the area of requirements. ' 24 it‘s import ant to haze this caveat, if vou il 1. oR Now recommendation 1 : really suggests that- the oversight TOP SECRET v**D A AUL NW 50955 DocId:32423509 ”
“p.m., the hearing in the 21 above -mentioned matter was concluded.) 22 23 24 © 25 TOP SECRET”
“>t. SIONIFICAHT LEGAL PRECEDENTS APPEAR TO HAVE BEES ESTABLISHED BY RAIDER is WHICH THIS TRIAL WAS CONDUCTED WHICH Cas a HELP7U in FUTURE LITIGATION INVOLVING AGENCY. E.Q., COURT ISSUED ORDER OR FIRST DAY OF TRIAL WHICH PRECLUDED TAKING OF PHOTOGRAPHS is COURTROOM AID RESTRIC”
“the Agency did’ not so interpret them. 69 HW 50955 DocId:32423525 Page 175”
“attention to the fact that the response 25 J given, was not really — NW 48331 DocId:32277210 Page 11 TOP FORET”
“pertaining to him has not been feasible." w N /s e 3. (U) Recommendations: See Tabs 12-4S. ig "d s p 4. (U) This memorandum has as yet not been coordinated XX with Mr. Zicbell of the Office of the General Counsel. is q p z g riyalA Winthrop W. Brown (C) -e v ”