“4 should be provided no later than December 13, 1995. We hope that during HRG's review of the January documents, the standards outlined in Dared Moral Ry this letter will be kept in mind. If at any point an issue is deemed so sensitive that a briefing is required, ARRB staf”
“records today. The talking points paper for the DO briefing, which I left with you, will give you a good sense of the type of information the ARRB staff is interested in. If you have any questions, please give me a call on extension 31825. CC: Becky L. Rant @ DA John Pereira”
“meeting and the testimony about its significance on the issue of authorization is discussed in detail in Section 5 (iii), infra. NW 50955 DocId: 32423539 Page 251”
“pertaining to him has not been feasible." w N /s e 3. (U) Recommendations: See Tabs 12-4S. ig "d s p 4. (U) This memorandum has as yet not been coordinated XX with Mr. Zicbell of the Office of the General Counsel. is q p z g riyalA Winthrop W. Brown (C) -e v ”
“14-00000 CONFIDENTIAL 5. Mr. Strickland of OGC has concurred in these recommendations. A. B. Swider DDO Appeals Officer Attachments: Tab A - References A-C . Tab B - Full Text and Sanitized Versions Tab C - Army Document for Referral -3- CONFIDENTIAL”
“files will turn out have been lost or destroyed. The proposed Review Board would thus have to confess not only that it chose”
“the work. Nevertheless, the Board's nun is hearing held at the Review Board’s validity of competing accounts of what”
“hat this would not be necessary. He returned our exhibits and told us to consider the matter closed. NW 65990 Docld:32392257 Page 9”
“reasons for conclusion (b) Statement as to whether information furnished coincides‘ [ substantially with other available information 29 8-13-70 NW 88321 Docld:32989529 Page 2011 *”
“andS±af£75.Fol Director will agree to allow Counsel to be present during one Enclosures ST-106 00 mrrems ENDS-sh WOC:ebc (9) 50 APR.A. NW 88296 Dpcld:32989628 Page 136 5 CONTINUED - OVER end 6000”
“time. This fact and the fact that Mrs. Thornell was paid for six days past May 13, in my opinion, dis- credits Mrs. Thornell claim to "the punitive nature of the decision." The facts clearly show that Mrs. Thornell was given special consideration. NW 88326 Docl:32244106 Pa”
“NAME AND SIGNATURE do/ i363 DC/LE--------------------------- Roland E. Dulin X BY REVIEWING OFFICIAL ' COMMENTS or REVIEWING OFFICIAL I concur in above assessment. DATE OFFICIAL TITLE OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL TYPED OR PRINTED NAMES AND SIGNATURE 9. • J ADR ........ .....”
“m responding to the above request. It is requested that y ou furnish a copy of th e enclosed memo ra ndum to the HSCA. Enclosures (2) 62-117290 " RRCB:pm (7) GITAL Assoc. Dir. Dep.”
“directive or something to that effect. 23 Mr. Aaron. Certain categories. 24 Mr. Bader. Certain categories. 25 Mr. Kirbow. That is brand new ground. TAD gecomT NW 50955 DocId: 32423513 Page 7”
“- Now, I realize that we have said that our other recommen 22 - dation by implication, would prohibit this, but it is only by 23 implication, I would think. 24 Mr. Maxwell. My sense is that by providing this 25 Mr. Aaron. You kind of create a channel. TAR ERPDET • NW 50”
“call back collect in the next few days when it could ex- plain to ser when and where she could receive, a Committee letter delineating why the Committee wished to interview her. 1009/ The Committee wrote the letter and made arrange- Classification: 386 2000345 Classified b”
“13-00000■ 04/16/97 WED 16:15 FAX 202 724 0457 AKiW Mr. J. Barry Harrelson April 16, 1997 Page 12 Conclusion Please let me know if you have any supplements or corrections. We would very much like to ensure that these matters are handled expeditiously. As always, we appre”
“order that they may begin their inspection while the remainder.is being assembled. NW 50955 DocId:32112856 Page 9”
“13-00000 remte Ms. Laura Denk, Esquire HRP/OIM: apd/(14 Sep 98) Distribution: Original - Addressee 1 - Subject File te”
“granted no 4/2 . both in the order and our proposed statute, particularly in the area of requirements. ' 24 it‘s import ant to haze this caveat, if vou il 1. oR Now recommendation 1 : really suggests that- the oversight TOP SECRET v**D A AUL NW 50955 DocId:32423509 ”
“were to come down, they would probably have indicated in their 25 report that they had passed this information on. NW 50955 DocId:32202440 Page 41 TA D CECDET”
“requested by the ARRB, the DO distributed the employee bulletin via Lotus Notes on 17 2”
“concern for appearances and for their own interests to the detriment of the decisionmaking process." nl46 The Court knows whereof it speaks, as its decisionmaking process in conference remains entirely confidential. n147 - Footnotes- nl43. Both the plain reading of the stat”
“were, constantly in my mind as I reviewed the Fourth Evaluation Report. Rather than ignoring its advice, I relied heavily on its comments and.conclusions. 16 NW 50955 DocId: 32424709 Page 137”
“entative during deposition or providing written "responses to questions & will let you know outcome. ORM610 US USE PREVIOUS EDITIONS ☐ ☐ ☐SECRET CONFIDENTIAL INTERNAL USE ONLY ☐ UNCLASSIFIED NW 65924 Docld:32343547 Page 2”
“like to help you. I am prepared to -3 | specualte as I have been doing on things that are somewhat 24 beyond my direct experience and direct responsibility. There n. h is a limit. Mr. Goldsmith. Now, if someone checking ISR notes that NW 48331 DocId: 32277210 Page 39 REO”
“the Agency did’ not so interpret them. 69 HW 50955 DocId:32423525 Page 175”
“This fact and the fact that Mrs. Thornell was paid for six days past May 13, in my opinion, dis credits Mrs. Thornell claim to "the punitive nature of the decision. 11 The facts clearly show that Mrs. Thornell was given special consideration. NW 88326 Docl:32244106 Page 10”
“would preclude the Board from disputing the validity of such a regulation at a later date.' None of the above options guarantee success. However, I have discussed these options with Dawn Eilenberger, and we believe that Option #_ is the best approach to take. OIM concurs. Ple”
“me Section 0.15(b) (7) under your proposed Order. The following is in response to your nemorandum of April”
“consistent with the 1400.5. ! I recommend that the Board, in the near future, deliberate on the guidance that it wishes to give to the staff regarding these matters. 9^”
“this would 22 not pick up that kind of abuse that you have discussed here. 23 Mr. diGenova. Suppose it had been disposed of to Admiral 24 Raborn, and they knew.about it, and the AG said, why is this 25 being done? It would raise a red flag which would not otherwise TAB C”
“reads, I would have or would be opposed to it because 24 it provides an exception with the approval of the versight 25 TAnEDET NW 50955 DocId: 32423513 Page 67”
“his representative review the documentation that backs up the narrative. The documentation has not b een keyed into the narrative presentation, but it follows the chronologi- cal order of presentation from 9 October into the lat est developments in the matter, an d there is an ov”
“turned up one additional monthly report that was not located in the project file. A third relevant Classification: ■ 200 0882 Classified by derivation: 132 NW 48327 DocId: 32263889 Page 27.”
“I concur in the above evaluation. DATE 19 suit '46 OFFiciau rirue or REVIEWING OFFICIAL I Deputy Assistant for | Plans and Development SECRET 77eie I 1 4 1 9”
“surveillance conducted during the relevant time periods."”
“E TO BE RETAINED. THOSE NOT INDICATED FOR PETENTION ARE AUTHOR. ZED FOR IMMEDATE DESTRUCTION 4. 141c NW 65990 Docld:32404765 Page 2 ☐ CONTINUED ON SEPARATE PAGE 115-30)”
“a later date but not now, in my opinion. SECRET . NW 50955 DocId:32276061 Page 111”
“ARAMETERS OF INTERIEW OR PRI VILEGED AREAS. THE CONSULTANT DID NOT ACT AS A LEGAL ADVISOR. EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY, BUREAU WILL NO LON GE R PR O VI DE NW 65994 Docl d:32989794 Page 11 P”
“further information from the - Department about this natter since last June. For the purposes of - completing our record on this subject, I would appreciate it if you would inform the Committee whether the Department has received any additional information about this subject ”
“within reasonable amount of time. Changes made 20 July 166 SIGNED AT Has 19 1 April 1964 William M. Kent DATE CONFIDENTIAL Tuna 19 02**”
“Txk***3og"z MXMXEX If they are favorable to this procedure take all possible measures to prepare for the i-meditate transmittal of such a re@tet short of the actual preparation of a written document|y-the-dissidents) for advance transfer to you. %, Goodwin a % * 1’* ,7”
“could consider releasing them. He suggested that we secure s atements admissible in United 2000983 Classification, a —x ,6 GJo otter. 10 V’d Less - % idtv derivation: ziW 4 NW 48327 DocId:32263889 Page 333”
“"F.izzature) C. TracyBarnes Concur. Date: C/DO C, Tracy Barnes 2”
“lend itself to conversion to contract d’Y employed time. ^Pee 70; As of this date, CPs had heard nothing more from subject and it was therefore assumed that St subject had, for at least for the in mediate moment, decided not to pursue the matter further.. Paul Kilson 3 bee ”
“ecome Section 0.15(b) (7) under your proposed Order. The following is in response to your nemorandum of Apri”
“ecome Section 0.15(b) (7) under your proposed Order. The following is in response to your nemorandum of Apri”
“underlying this opinion are too attenuated for the Committee to adopt it as a finding. opia NW 50955 DocId:32423525 Page 168”
“Approved: 1000 Sent M Per iur Special Agent in Charge NW 88296 Docld:32989574 Page 17 ■”