“Tradecraft training and « field assignment. Both are planned in the next six months. Panda Sr II/Tramiy 17, IF PERFORMANCE DURING REPORT PERIOD HAS BEEN UNSATISFACTORY. THERE IS ATTACHED COPY OF MEMORANDUM NOTIFYING this PERSON OF UNSATISFACTORY PERfmaNCE. irTi^wijrf^FT^^ A”
“judgment and appropriate calm and circus- spection. Ho was also most receptive to, and cooperative in, Headquarters suggestions in this matter. He in, of course, cost • conscious and an excellent supervisor. His overall performance • is that of a high order of senior Agency o”
“there is a large grey area between the responsibilities of the CA Staff and the responsibilities of DODS in this respect. SECTION 0. CERTIFICATION AND COMMENTS• Chi Bell Po 1. BY EMPLOYEE - I CERTIFY THAT 1 HAVE SEEN SECTIONS A, B, AND C OF THIS REPORT 3. COMMENTS Of REVI”
“appropriate calm and circum spection. He was also most receptive to, and cooperative in, Headquarters suggestions in this matter. He is, of course, cost conscious and an excellent supervisor. His overall, performance is that of a high order of senior Agency officers.. | SEC”
“next TDY trip to Headquarters. - SIGNATURE KatiaA pare 3. BY REVIEWING OFFICIAL ,COMMENTS OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL Concur in rating officer's judgment. DATE OFFICIAL TITLE OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL TYPED SIGNATURE 17 July 1968 Chief, DO Division Jen SECRET”
“more significant. Cases in litigation involving DDO materials now number 58 and the appeal pattern is now run- ning 1:2 (i.e., one appeal for -two initial requests, with subsequent litigation--anticipating deep analysis and Deputy Director-level review) compared to 1:3 last y”
“within set time lists, he sometimes short-circuited a few coordinations in other offices, but this did not seriously detract, in my opinion, from a very proficient job. While Mr. McCord has not had the Technical Division a sufficiently long time for me to judge hits long ran”
“EMPLOYEE / CERTIFY THAT I HAVE SEEN SECTIONS A, B, AND C OF THIS REPORT *6AvgT sids*runkomPloyEE: 21 August 1973 i/S/ Jerome Fox — 2. BY SUPERVISOR '*herw***PL9vre NAG BCAN Tir THIS ASPORT HAS NOT Bktn SHOWN % EMPLOYEE, aive ERFCANATION . USSR. MBUPLIVLO ------- orziciat ”
“14-00000 1 Mr TSV SECRET SECURITY INFORMATION PERSONNEL EVALUATION REPORT 19me 1 through 6 will be comptoted by Administrative or Personnel Officer O81 11 8 vo NAME flest) (flrat; tuladiet 2. GRADE 9. POS:1:0 TITLE Smith Joseph Burkholder GS-12 C^a Officer (FV) co-PP ”
“Station Area Operations Officer .y. GRADE 8. DATE REPORT Duf *0a ♦. PERIOD COVERED BY THIS REPORT (Reclusive dates), 10. GS-12 TYPE of REPORT• I***** X 1 Corobor 1956 to 30 Sopa 1 br *14531d%06*1.50Pfev1304 1052 special (Specify) (Check one) •I AS vvim t • EPLQvte 1 SE”
“date, is ready to assume course supervisory responsibility. I strongly recommend this his request for an "extension of his tour in OTR be accepted. SECTION D CERTIFICATION AND COMMENTS 1. BY EMPLOYEE DATE 2. January 29 (L. MONTHS EMPLOYEE HAS BEEN 1 CERTIFY THAT I HA”
“Area Ops Officer 9. PERIOD COVERED BY THUS REPORT (Inclusive dates) 0s-11 5 July 1957__ 27 Dec 56 - 17 J-a 57 to. TYPE OF REPORT INITIAL X A C4s s I «MM CM T. sur t* vs 50 • SPECIAL (Specify) (Check one) AMMUAL sAS510NVENT-MPLOYZE SECTION B. CERTIFICATION 1, FON THE RATER: T”
“SECTION 0 CERTIFICATION AND COMMENTS- 1. : BY EMPLOYEE - - ICERTIFY THAT I HAVE SEEN SECTIONS A. B. AND C OF THIS REPORT DATE - SIGNATURE or EMPLOYEE 2. . BY SUPERVISOR MOLYHS EMPLOYEE HAS BEEN IF THIS REPORT HAS HOT BEEN SHORN TO EMPLOYEE, GIve EXPLANATION UNDER MY SUPERV”
“copy of the *91 andun fying him of unsetisfactory performance. This report X has / has not been shown to the individual reted. Secamber win an ------------Troston Cobertila ohn € HAVE REVIEBED This REPORT 14 Dec 45 fov %o. 55 REPLACES PREVIOUS EDITIONS Of Area (Eopla”
“ASSIGNMENT 0V SEDTING K. 2. 9 0s 4 (for III, 2nd. Jed end 4th choice RFVA1 G * l BOXES. COMPLETE ALL ALTERNATE CHOICES AND OPTIONS IN ALL CASES EVEN THOUGH YOU ARE REQUESTING AN EXTENSION of YOUR TOUR. EXTENO TOUR 3 MONTHS AT CURRENT STATION TO 5 January 1976. toate ) BE”
“AND TRAINING: 14. 9 I ON ATONE : COMPLETE ITEM NO. 4.2. TRANSMITTAL swCEr. ro inoicare COUPLETION or TutS PORtiOu 0* tug Fosw. - TO SE COMPLETED BY APPROPRIATE SUPERVISOR AT HEADQUARTERS 15 IN CONSIDERATION of THE PAST EXPERIENCE AND PERFORMANCE oF Tie EMPLOYER, His EXPRESSE”
“Recommend.approprlato,reassignment, if possipta.) . ' None i 16. mm TRAINING OR ROTATION 00 you RECOMMEND FOR THIS PERSON? None Jay 2 -i-ia y , regur,ourerNEGERGR-MESmerxeierromsumerolre. 17. IF PC9FORMANCE DURING REPORT PERIOD HAS BEEN UNSATISFACTORY, THERE 15 ATTAC”
“DESIGNATION 20 Jan. 192% M M , S. OFFICE/DIvis oy-amAnCE Or-ASS/ONMtN SIGNMEN •. OFFICIAL POSITION TITLE .. Toleo Station RED.ICOD Area Operations Officer. 7. GRADE e. DATE REPORT.DUE IN OP, •. PERIOD COVERED ov THIS REPORT (Inclusive’daten) GS-12 Octohor 1956 t6 20 02;tom”
“(Spocily) DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION No. DOCUMENT DATE/PERIOD FORM 764 j 2 - 29 JULY 1967 - REMARKS ARRIVAL DATE REPORTED UNDER "OTHER REMARKS" ON DUTY STATUS REPORT. PREPARED ay vgvont annoraryo av 680:6 DATA CERTIFIED CORRECT, 0A580 upon seumcE oco CantsoL GocuuseT DOCUMEN”
“SEEN SECTIONS A, B, AND C OF THIS REPORT 21 am 64 7 DATE SIQNAT.* 2. David Menady MONTHS-EMPLOY EP HAS BEEN - IF THIS REPORT HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN TO EMPLOYEE, GIve E’PLAHATION UNDER MY SUPERVISION ! 8 DATE official TITLE or SUPERVISOR 21- Apr 64 Chief, SR Division 3.”
“DA’E REPORT out IN OP *. PERIOD CoveRto Bv 1i 5 urronr Inclusive Jatea) OS 11 I 19 March 1956 ,19 Narch 55 -19 March_56 10. Ti or rpost 1*1 t1 *L 1 «sassoi*-sop-iso | i «Picl (Specify) X CERTIFICATION. ._. - / SECTION B. 1. FOR TAP RATER: tirig uspoxt[ HAS L MA 5 Nor PLIN ”
“---- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 1. BY EMPLOYEE Europe -widebasis. t CERTIFY THAT I HAVE SEEN SECTIONS A, B, AND C OF THIS REPORT DATC SIGNATURE OF EMPLOYEE 2. 25 May 196h- .. /s/ .Thana s BY B. CASISIN-”
“REFLECTION UPON HIS own ABILITY AND QUALIFICATION FOR THE POSITION HE HOLDS. - : .C. No REPORTS WILL BE RENCERLD COVERING Prn1oos OF LESS ThAR so DAYS ossE*v£D SERVICE. 4, REPORTS WILL NORMALLY ef CLASSIFIED CONFIDENTIAL, o*tven, THE CLASSIFICATION May ot RAISED IF DEEMED AO ”
“The trans- lation product in presently exnet and conforms to the Station's standaris for such work. A: Subject becomes more familiar with specific Station re- quirements, tiro.h experience and with closer supervision than afforded to date, he will be able to make n more imagi”
“OFFICTAL POSITION TITLE F. FI DDP/WE/FI Staff Ops Officer (CE) 7. GRADE .•. DATE SPORT DUE IN OF - »IPER:O COVERED Bv Twis REPORT (Inclusive,datea)klm GS-II 18 May 1956 1 Dec 1955 to 18 May 1956 ‘10, TYPE OF REPORT •1 a • si duu € • r. sue’s Hi she »Pkciac (Specify) (Check”
“ASSIGNMENT •. OFFICIAL POSITION TITLE DDP/WH/II/DC ------ Area Ops Officer - Branch Chief 65-15 9 November 1957 7. GRADE I. DATE REPORT DUK IM OP . PERIOD COVERED By THIS REPORT (IncluSive,dates) ' - ih 21 Oct 56 - 20 Oct. 57 rass « ««N tel quegve 10 * pescias (Specify) ”
“0000 SECRET SECURITY ImFCGMATIDN PERSONNEL EVALUATION REPORT Ttens 1 through, will be comptbred ar Adwiniotcot or Personnel Officer Xs mAmE (Lest). ,(FlPst! middle: • seape 3. Ca TITLE-. __ Richardson Jhc me W0. GS-33, Aroo Con, 0“’esp —-gn-Py ------ .— =—- %.OFFICE Sta”
“BY EMPLOYEE DATE STATEMENT CONCERNING THIS EVALUATION OF MY PERFORMANCE HAVE ATTACO have NOT ATTACHED // Ja Jan 74 3. BY REVIEWING OFFICIAL COMMENTO or REVIEWING OFFICIAL I concur with the rating officer’s comments above. € husburg DATE 11 Jr) 1.: OFFICIAL TITLE”
“dealing with the senior management of this Station. Shortly after his arrival he took over the analysing and distribution of the cables, and prepared a Station procedure for this purpose. Immediately following that, he devised a new procedure for handling correspondence and- ”
“ERV ISOR AT FICLO -S TA T- 0N- 13. 48 CONSIDERATION or THE PAST EAPERIENCC AND PERFORMANCE OF THE (MPLOYCE, HIS EXPRESSED PREFERENCE FOR NEXT ASSIGwuent, AND THE STAFFING REQUIREMENTS OF THE STATION, INDICATE YOUR RECOMMENDATION FOR HIB.NCXT ADBIGNMENT Ning ..: 1062 *** t .* -”
“A. 8. AND C OF THIS REPORT DATE ~ (SIGNATURE OF I’M P woveei’sy Iting v 0E.VJC.9. (sir ed in pseudo on 24 Apri168 Fiold Transsittal) 2. BY SUPERVISOR MONTHS EMPLOYEE HAS BEEN IP THIS REPORT HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN TO EMPLOYEE, GIVE F.XPLANATiOn UNDER MY SUPERVISION 8 Months TYPED ”
“NAVE MIRII DESIRE Mil? 11. ENTER HERE ANY DESIRED REMARKS PERTAINING TO PARTICULAR QUALIFICATIONS OR LACK THEREOF WHICH ARE CONSIDERED PERTINENT TO THE EVALUATION OF THIS EMPLOYEE. OUTSTANDING ASSETS AND/OR SERIOUS LIMITATIONS SHOULD BE STATED ALSO REASONS FOR AND RECOMMENDATI”
“The variation in Rating Letter grades reflects the longer period of assessment. ,Subject has improved demonstrably in approaches and initiative under Specific Duty No. 3; under Specific Duty No. 6 the current Supervisor has noted a tendency to be less than prompt in finalizing”
“programs, and, although he has not been assigned arry to date, in ready to assume course supervisory responsibility. I strongly recommend this his request for an extension of his tour in OTR be accepted. SECTION D CERTIFICATION AND COMMENTS 1. BY EMPLOYEE I CERTIFY THA r I”
“planning to return for a second tour, no additional training is recommended at this time. In preparing this report, careful consideration was given to the guidance in YE Field Dispatch Ho. 20-40 which recognizes the principle of rating the individual against the group, and e”
“ATTENDANCE REPORT OTHER (Specify) WH BTO 1/24 DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION NO. REMARKS 11/11-12/4/73 DOCUMENT 1 PREPARED BY ABOVE DATA CERTIFIED CORRECT, BASED UPON SOURCE oco X Comrao DOCUMENT DOCUMENT CITED c • % eevis+09. crse. CAT >nuti« DATE 1/23/74 Drvice E.E”
“DATE OFFICIAL TITLE OF SUPERVISOR TYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE 10 January 1972 Chief, WII Division William V. Broc 3. BY REVIEWING OFFICIAL COMMENTS OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL Please see attached. DATE OFFICIAL TITLE OF REVIEWING OFFICIAL TYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNA”
“of this reporting period, no meaningful rating can be given. SECTION D CERTIFICATION AND COMMENTS 1. BY EMPLOYEE I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE SEEN SECTIONS A, 8, AND C OF THIS REPORT DATE 2. SIGNATURE or EMPLOYEE BY SUPERVISOR Forking MONTHS EMPLOYEE HAS BEEN IF THIS REPORT”
“rpi’A 08 ASSIGNMENT , - _DD//H/Havana - DCOS 71 GRADE . DATE LOT out i* or ». PERIOD nosiato ur mis RIPORT (inclusive detes) GS-13 1 30 September 1950___ 30 September 1955 - 39 September 1956___ 10.Type OF REPORT res-4.@fe--9ueie.ivoe • 1• • • •01 I I ****** (Specify) (Che”
“EMPLOYEE 1 CERTIFY THAT / HAVE SEEN SECTIONS A, B, ANO C OF THIS REPORT DATE SIGNATURE OF EMPLOYEE /s/-mrmeni 2. BY SUPERVISOR MCS T HS EMPLOYEE HAS BEEN IF THIS REPORT HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN TO EMPLOYEE, GIVE EXPLANATION UNDER MY SUPERVISION 29 DATE OFFICIAL TITLE OF SUPERV”
“SUPERVISOR MONTHS EMPLOYEE HAS BEEN pFists REPORT HAS NOT BEEN SHOWN TO EMPLOYEE, GIVE EXPLANATION UNDER MY SUPERVISION 8 Months DATE OFFICIAL TITLE OF SUPERVISOR : TYPED OR PRINTED NAME AND SIGNATURE Branch (oigned in naerio on .: . m mrone) 24 April 68 Chief, Special O”
“ATTENDANCE REPORT OTHER (Specify) DOCUMENT IDENTIFICATION No. DOCUMENT DATE/PERICO REMARKS 1 H 48.70 0-012110 PREPARED BY agponr AAAIV*><A oa ABOVE DATA CERPIF163 CORRECT. BASED UPON SOURCE SCO Comreou DCUUSNT DOCUMENT CITED °c a a Rivisioa. CAT bivisiom cras. DATE ”
“HAVE SEEN THE P, OF THIS REPORT. I HAVE A STATEMENT U- EVALUATION * - ....... CONCERNING - -- - OF MY PERFORMANCE ENTRIES IN HAVE NOT THE REVIVING .apo ALL SECTIONS ATTACHED OFFICIAL’S 21/6/78 CONFIDENTIAL”
“EXTENT OF HIS COORDINATION WITH THE AREA DIVISIONS. - , ON MATTERS WHERE HE FEELS THAT DIVISION JUDGMENT 1 SHOULD BE . BROUGHT TO BEAR ON AN ‘%. INTELL CABLE. HE IS METICULOUSLY CORRECT IN HIS APPROACH TO HIS DUTIES AND KNOWS : HOW TO BALANCE CUSTOMER NEED FOR ENLIGHTENMENT ON”
“greatest contribution to the Station during the reporting period has been his vast background and knowledge of the complex PBRUMEN picture which he cheerfully and unstintingly makes available to all Station officers, many of whom are without previous WHD experience. . . : i”
“pury STATUS OR TIME AND ATTENDANCE REPORT oruga (Specify) DoCuwERT IDENTIFICATION No. DOCUMENT DATE/PERIOD REMARKS Dennis R. Bass so PPEPAREO AT PO1 anmorargo 0% BASED UPON SOURCE Coqreou pocuutur Dcd X X cal opsition, cve». DATE car osviston 26 July 71 THIS REPOR”
“engineers working under his direction. C. Carries on liaison with several government agencies and monitors and guides projects being done at such facilities in our behalf. d. Participates in the evaluation of operational requirements and research and development proposals. 0”
“pseudo on Field Transmittal) 3*=BY SUPERVISOR 2. 'MONTHS EMPLOYEE HAS BEEN ir THIS REPORT HASNOT 86 EN SHOWN TO EMPLOYES, GIVE EXPLANATION UNDER MV SUPERVISION 12 DATE Official TITLR OF SUPERVISOR ■ TYPED GW PRINTED NADE AND SIGNATURE |/s/ Andrew K. REUTEMAN wl : Chief”
“in its present very good state. (continued) SECTION D CERTIFICATION AND COMMENTS 1. BY EMPLOYEE I CERTIFY THAT I HAVE SEEN SECTIONS A, B, AND C OF THIS REPORT OATE SIGNATURE OF EMPLOYEE 2. 7 Aug - 1972 ‘ /s/ Charlotte Z. Bustos-Videla 8 • SUP ER FOR MONTHS EMPLOYEE 204”
“PERSON? Tradecraft training and a field assignment. Both are planned in the next six months. 2a I WAVE REVIEWED THE ABOVE REPORT. 29. COMMENTS: July 54 Comments, If ony, sro shown in Panda Sohr 17” PERFORMANCE DURING REPORT PERIOD WAS BEEN UNSATISFACTORY, THERE IS ATTACHE”