“s nation outside your Committee. Its use is limited to official proceedings by This document is prep ared in response to your request and is not for dissemi- (8) MAIL ROOM your Committee and the content may not be disclosed to unauthorized person- nel without the express approva”
“13-00000 - : APPEALS REVIEW FORM we 320 say 15 3-51 contain5 DISPATCH UFGA-29884 dated 11 April 1968 but not sent Drepuester by IPS ) Previously denied in toto under exemption(s) of Recommended KL 5 under Segregable portions previouslyyreleases; excised portions exempte”
“13-00000 Attachment E. 0. 11652 Exemptions for Items in The CIA and The Cult of Intelligence Item Manuscript Page No. Exemption 26 p. 47 5 B (1) (2) 27 p. 48 5 B (1) (2) 28 p. 48 5 B (1) 31 p. 54 5 B (2) 38 p. 63 5 B (2) (3) 41 p. 65 5 B (2) (3) 42 p. 65 a 5 B (2) ”
“(b)(3) and (b)(1). b. Internal office (EX) memorandum dated 14 July 11967: excised portions exempt under FOIA (b)(6), personal privacy, (b)(3) and (b)(1), / c. Internal office memorandum (EX') dated 26 April 1968: excised portions exempt under FOIA (b) (6) personal privac”
“releases and that it is impossible to do accurate computer dFouleproof In order to avoid problems like this in the future, HRG K ntifer searches about our releases on specific subjects. Although HRG personnel are extremely knowledgeable on what has been released, with ove”
“13-00000 •/ SECRET r Attachment E. 0. 11652 Exemptions for Items in The CIA and The Cult of Intelligence Item Manuscript Page No. Exemption 26 p. 47 5 B (1) (2) 27 p. 48 5 B (1) (2) 28 p. 48 5 B (1) 31 p. 54 5 B (2) 38 p. 63 5 B (2) (3) 41 p. 65 5 B (2) (3) 42 p”
“declassified with quite minimal deletions and transferred to the/ National Archives for release to the public. This is, I Reler acknowledge, a small fraction of what we have, but it is an earnest of my commitment immediately to begin review for 0 Chama declassification of ”
“13-00000- APPEALS REVIEW FORM 329 dated 26 Apr. 1968 ib 9(0 contains DRAFT MEMO NOT • ■ but ) Previously denied in toto under exemption(s) 0 under Segregable, Re portions commended previously for releasee; no excised t sent ST Requeste portions r b of exem”
“ec'y 行业 wock SFP:eks nation outside your Committee. Its use is limited to official proceedings by Th is document is prepared in response to your request and is not for dissemi- (8) MAIL ROOM your Committee and the content may not be disclosed to unauthorized person- nel without ”
“the other agency(ies). 9 Page(s) withheld for the following reason(s): For your information: % The following number is to be used for reference regarding these pages: 65-6165-25,26 XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX X DELETED PAGE(S) X XXXXXX X NO DUPLICATION FEE X XXXXXX X FOR TH”
“13-00000 SLUALI 2 5 APR 1977 MEMORANDUM FOR: Special Assistant to DDO for External Oversight FROM: Richard S. Sampson Chief, European Division SUBJECT: Marks-Marchetti Manuscript: Review of Deletions 1. As requested, the European Division has reviewed the items perta”
“items mentioned above which we believe portions can now be released. The portions in red brackets remain classified and should not be released. 3. Since many of the deleted items involved the National Security Agency (NSA), we attempted to coordinate our determina tions thr”
“items mentioned above which we believe portions can now be released. The portions in red brackets remain classified and should not be released. . . . 3. Since many of the deleted items involved the National 'Agency Security ‘ (NSA), we attempted to coordinate our determina- ”
“Intelligence Activities, page 552, and Ray S. 00-, Cline's book entitled, Secrets, Spies and Scholars; Blueprint ay 'of the Essential CIA, pages 131 and 132, Additionally, though "Mr. Cline, a former senior CIA officer, allowed the Agency to -review his manuscript prior to pu”
“Technical Corrections By NaralD 05-Oct-99 NARA ID Date Of Change Meeting Date Page Change of Postpnement Comments 104-10077-10371 11-Dec-98 06-Aug-98 2 12 vice 7 ARRB missed reviewing page 2. One name and 2 digraphs are protected on page 1; 2 names of CIA employees need to be ”
“13-00000 IUNCLASSIFIED. CONFIDENTIAL SECRET TOP SECRET APPEALS REVIEW FORM 338 1. Tab €8-5 "contains 2. Memo B-2628 ( ) Previously denied in toto under exemption(s) dated 21 May 71 of 0 Segregable portions previously released; excised portions exempted (G)(1) (6) (2) ”
“with ITG on the selected portions that should be extracted for release (see attached marked copy). The balance of the document, however, must be considered exempt under (b)(3)(a) and (b)(6) of the FOIA. 5. In summary, it is recommended that the appeal be denied and the exemp”
“made, please make them and forward the sanitized version 3. to this Staff to send to the requester. Cite the FOIA . subsection which applies to the deleted portions. If the document is denied please cite the appropriate 200jr.PIC AT-1 200 subsection (s) of the FOIA. ”
“14-00000 Ox Nr f 'teg Aceutu ‘. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ) GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION 3a National Archives and Records Service' Washington, DC 20103 Tn reply refer to:. NC.K-76-321 MAY 10 16/3- Mr. Gene F. Wilson Information and Privacy Coordinator LOE Centr”
“13-00000 7 1 IN 91393 - 2. 6 Unb , _____ 5 3.65 contains Cable Mex City 5.210BW(Larson)15 Apr. 68F01 Previously denied in toto under exemption (s) dated of (DX3), (b)(6).- ( ) Segregable portions previously released; excised portions exempted under of () Located d”
“13-00000 1 APPEALS REVIEW FORM nef 336 1. .o 4 Tab FT30387 372- contains Ind Lettundstucpes ( ) Previously denied in toto under exemption(s) dated Sept 17, 1969 of (.) Segregable portions previously released; excised portions exempted ■ under .of ■ . () Located duri”
“appropriate, the DCI may discuss this sensitive material with the entire Select Committee. He considers it essential that the written record provided to the Committee staff not include such sensitive information for the - protection of intelligence sources and methods. • - - ”
“13-00000 & :1s The applicability of these exemptions has been explained to you in our earlier correspondence. Documents Exemptions • 224-225. Two cables, dated 10 April 1968. ()(), (b)(3) I226. Cable, dated 10 April 1963. (b)(1), (b) (3), (b) (6). 227-229. Three cables”
“Appendix C, Part I, Item number 6. Tab D - Unexcised version of documents furnished to SS C in resp onse to request in Appendix C, Part I, Item number 9. Tab E Tab F - Excised ve rsion of 38 memoranda being held at FBI HQ f or review by SSC. Unexcised version of 38 memoranda bein”
“this Staff to send to the requester. Cite the FOIA subsection which applies to 9. the deleted portions. If the document is denied please cite the appropriate IO. subsection(s) of the FOIA. IP4127 In both of the above instances please name the attn il. denying official”
“13-00000 APPEALS REVIEU FORM 9 331 Hmma- 346880 Tab 5.69 con tains DISPATCH W/ 4 acxemption(sy 0 Previously denied in toto under ited 20 May 1968. tts (mussing)b/D) (bx3) (bx6) ofEola ( ) Segregable portions previously released; excised portions exempted under 1 - - : -”
“ormation. The documents f., g. and b. did not becona available until after the initial response to Mr. Singerman and therefore were not considered in that reply. 3 .- On the basis of our review, we believe items a., b. and e. were properly exempted in accord with (b) (1) and (”
“14-00000 .UNITED STATES OF AMERICA_ GENERAL SERVICES ADMINISTRATION VE • € National Archives and Records Service- Washington, DC 20409 :Th reply refer to:) -LK-76-260; APR 19 S7S E-76-124 Mr. Gene F. Wilson i Information and Privacy Coordinator. Central Intelligenc”
“document- is Ration outsi your. is limited Committee. Its use 1° Tim your Commie and the context may not be » ‘e 11. PE to disclosed official to proceedings by unauthorized person- n without the express approval of the FBI • 1 / ODEC: :53 ~7%* 1 NW 50955 DocId: 3”
“13-00000 APPEALS REVIEW FORM 319 l’ab 6-52 con t.a ins Dispatch UFGA-29877 dated 11 Apr.1968 ( ) Riommended for fat notoent B requestor Pg IPS Previously denied in toto under exemption(s) 0 Segregable portions previouslytreleases; excised portions exempted of lndcr u”
“(b) () Privacy of other individual (b) (5) (D)(1) (1) C). Does not pertain to request R/A "Exempted portions are not relevant to the requester" Path Elegy ( ) Information fion another Government agency (b) (I) (j)(1) (c) . *( ) Other, specify: *For further guidance rega”
“2000079”, APPEALS REVIEW FORM ab2-75 contains MEMO B-191 dated- 9 Oct. 1968 % Previously denied in toto under exemption(s (b)()(LiaisoN) (D)3DE FOIA -) )Segregable portions previously released; excised portions exempted under / of -----------------------------------------”
“SECRET; describes intelligence sources and methods as related to several magazine publica tions. [Section 5(B)(2)] NOTE: CA Staff confirms the need for continued classification and will comment separately. No CCS record. d. Item 48, page 71a -- AFRICA REPORT. Classified SE”
“number of files from the microfilm part of the collection that Michelle Combs reviewed and then crafted a "SECRET" classified memo identifying the reels and folders of the files that were then declared "Not Believed Relevant." 23 SECRET”
“13-00000; 5 APPEALS’ REVIEW FORM 333 agA 9-55 4 1 contains MEMO B-173 Tab. RecommendeN/ATT. ( ) Previously denied in toto under 0 Segregable CX d For(Newsnotpaper fitFOIA 19 Septntor1968 sent Preque of excised portions exempted portions previously/released; of by”
“13-00000 oFebruary 1968, exempt under (b)(6); EX-895, 7 March 1968; exempt under (b)(6); Kingston-4004, 2 6 April 1968, exempt under (b)(3)(a), (b)(3)(b), (b)(1)5(B)(1); Mexico City-5143, 7 April 1968, exempt under (b)(3)(a), (b)(3)(b); Tokyo-9443, 10 April 1968, exempt un”
“EdirbiThapar of the document copies with your response. ' Records Declassification Division| Enclosures U CLASSIFIED OPOS AT. OF ENCLOSURES 1”
“deletions directly thereon and returned to us - - • > While it is recognized that disposition of these documents could be made directly by you to the requester, we request their return so direct response to the requester may be made by the FBI. We have found, from past exper”
“another mutually agreeable solution. We strongly believe, however, that any approach which suggests that the U.S. Government may ignore its obligations and commitments to foreign governments would seriously undermine the vigorous and healthy diplomatic as well as intelligenc”
“attempts to leave the country. 14. TOP SECRET NW 50955 DocId: 32423566 Page 129”
“sing us to release our classified documents under threat of invoking the Freedom of Information Act. NW 65990 Docld:32392257 Page 7 2”
“e this in his written memorandum which he is going to forward to FBIHQ. In addition, Mr. SCHMIT shou ld be asked about a statement he made to Mr. C RE GAR re garding the reading of t he transcript of the staff membe rs for accurac y. Mr. CR EGAR believes Mr. SCHM IT sta ted that ”
“maintain the integrity of each envelope below E7E so that interested parties may know what was and was not DJ 15 MO P3 reviewed by HSCA staff members. 53 3. In some instances, the above files contain material marked in the lower right-hand corner with a green circular dot. ”
“thods, that should receive the most restricted handling. CONFIDENTIAL NW 65924 Docld:32364667 Page 2 Classitied by 13190 Exempt from general declassification schedule of E.O. 11652 exemption category 53(1), 2 (3) Automatically declassified on Date Impossible to Determine 20342 : ”
“1 4-00000 E-7 -150 NLK 76-321 Sopita-ber 22, 1976 ! LOS/APPEAL Information Rovlow Committee c/o Gone F. Wilson • - e76-ISo Information and Privacy Coordinator Central Intolligoneo Aglincy Washington, D.C. 20505 Dear Information Rovlas Cemaltteet : Uraloe tho prosl”
“provision 5(B)(3) of E. O. 11652 now be applied. The information is from a sensitive source with unique access to a poli- tical leader. If released, the information could cause embarrassment to the United States Govern ment and exacerbate relations with a friendly foreign ”
“13-00000 APPEALS REVIEW FORM -5.68 330 9 29 April 1968 DISPATCH OEPA-,1097 dated Watte (2)0) (DXI), (DV3) (DX6) “contains ), ) Previously denied in toto unde 2) Of, FOIA ) Segregable portions previously released; excised portions exempted under of ) Located during ”
“a re: FBI, DEA, etc. already. However, it is in a format that does not readily lend itself to isolat ing intelli- gence activities per se, h ence this request. Should there be any question s regar ding this matter, Ro ger Carroll of this staff, at 22 5-9751, is av aila ble for mo”
“14-00000 Page 3 (continued) 4. All directives, letters, memoranda, orders, reports, investigations or other records which describe, analyze or otherwise relate to rascism in the United States Marine Corp.’s. Since none of the statutory exemptions from the Freedom of Info”
“13-00000 APPEALS REV LEW FORM 322 IN 90561 ab8-53 CABLE contains JMWAYE 2022 dated 12 Apr. 1968 ) Previously denied in to to under exemption(s) 5 und Recommended PR but not sent its Requester bug TPS of Segregable portions previously releases, excised portions exempted”