“E AREAS ARE RELATING TO INFORMATION WHICH MAY ( A) IDENTIFY BUREAU SOURCES; (B) REV EAL SENSITI VE M ETHODS/TECHNIQUES; (C) REVEAL IDENTITIES OF THIRD AGENCIES, INCLUDING FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES, OR INFORMATION FROM SUCH AGENCIES; AND (D) ADVERSELY a AFFECT ONGOING BUREAU I”
“BUREAU CANNOT PROVIDE SAME; (2) THAT THE BUREAU HAS WAIVED THE CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT FOR THE INT ERVIEW WITHIN SPECIFIED PARAMETERS, AND (3) THAT THERE ARE FOUR PRIVILEGED AREAS IN WHICH HE IS NOT REQUIRED TO ANSWER QUESTION. THESE AREAS : ARE RELATING TO INFORMATION WHICH MA”
“ENCIES, INCLUDING FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES, OR INFORMATION FROM SUCH AGENCIES; AND (D) ADVERSEL Y a AFFECT ONGOING BUREAU INVESTIGATIONS. ☆ HERTO FO RE, BUREAU HAS OFFERED INTERVIEWEES CONSULTATIO N PRIVILEGES WHEREBY A BUREAU SUPERVIS OR WOULD BE AVAILABLE NEARBY, ALTOUGH N”
“ED TO ANSWER QUESTION. THESE AREAS : ARE RELATING TO INFORMATION WHICH MAY (A) IDENTIFY BUREAU SOURC ES; (B) REVEAL SENSITIVE METHODS/TECHNIQUES (C) REVEAL IDENTITIES OF THIRD AGENCIES, INCLUDING FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES, OR INFORMATION FROM SUCH AGENCIES; AND (D) ADVERSELY ”
“N FROM SUCH AGENCIES; AND (D) ADVERSELY AFFECT ONGOING BUREAU INVESTIGATIONS. HERETOFORE, BUREAU HAS OFFERED INTERVIEWEES . CONSULTATION PRIVILEGES WHEREBY A BUREAU SUPERVISOR WOULD BE AVAILABL E NEARBY, ALTHOUGH NOT ACTUALLY AT INTERVIEW, SO INTERVIEWEE M IGHT CONSULT WITH HIM S”
“ERETOFORE, BUREAU H AS OFFERED INTERVIEWEES. CONSULTATION PRIVILEGES WHEREBY A BUREAU SUPERVISOR WOU LD BE AVAILABLE NEARBY, ALTHOUGH NOT ACTUALLY AT INTERVIEW, SO INTERVIEWEE MIGHT CONSULT WITH HIM SHOULD QUESTIONS ARISE AS TO PARAMETERS OF INTERVIEW OR PRIVILEGED AREAS. THE CON”
“ITIVE METHODS/TECHNIQUES; (C) REVEAL IDENTITIES OF THIRD AGENCIES, INCLUDING FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE AG ENCIES, O R INFORMATION FROM SUCH AGENCIES; AND (D) ADVERS ELY a AFFECT ONGOING BUREAU INVE STIGATIONS . ☆ HERTO FO RE, BUREAU HAS OFFERED INTERVIEWEES CONSULTATION PRIVILEGES WH ”
“) THAT THERE ARE FOUR PRIVILEGED AREAS IN WHICH HE IS NOT REQUIRED TO ANSWER QUESTION. THESE AREAS : ARE RELATING TO INFORMATION WHICH MAY (A) IDENTIFY BUREAU SOURCES; (B) REVEAL SENSITIVE METHODS/TECHNIQUES (C) REVEAL IDENTITIES OF THIRD AGENCIES, INCLUDING FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE ”
“T THE LEGAL COUNSEL DIVISIO N BY COLLECT CALL FOR FURTHER INFO RMATION. IN THE USUAL C ASE, AS CIRCU MSTANCES UNFOLD, THE FORMER EMPLOYEE IS TOLD (1) THAT HE HAS A RIGHT TO LEGAL COUNSEL, BUT THAT THE BUREAU CANNOT PROVIDE SAME; (2) THAT THE BUREAU HAS WAIVED THE CONFIDENTIALITY ”
“WOULD BE A VAILABLE NEARBY, ALTHOUGH N OT ACTUALLY AT INTER VIEW, SO INTERVIEWEE MIGHT CONSULT WITH HIM SHOULD QUESTIONS ARISE AS TO PARAMETERS OF INTERVIEW OR PRIVILEGED AREAS. THE CONSULTANT DID NOT ACT AS A LEGAL ADVISOR. EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY, BUREAU WILL NO LONGER PROVIDE NW”
“WITH HIM SHOULD QUESTIONS ARISE AS TO PARAME TERS OF INTERVI EW OR PRIVILEGED AREAS. THE CONSULTANT DID NOT ACT AS A LEGAL ADVISOR. EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY, BUREAU WILL NO LONGER PROVIDE NW 65994 Docld:32176523 Page 9 G D ; PAGE THREE ON-THE-SCENE PERSONNEL FOR CONSULTATION PURPOSE”
“ES; AND ( D) ADV ERSELY AFFECT ONGOING BUREAU INVEST IGATIONS. H ERETOFORE, BUR EAU HAS OFFERED I NT ERVIEWEES. CONSULTATION PRIVILEGES WHEREBY A BUREAU SUPERVISOR WOULD BE AVAILABLE NEARBY, ALTHOUGH NOT ACTUALLY AT INTERVIEW, SO INTERVIEWEE MIGHT CONSULT WITH HIM SHOULD QUESTION”
“G BUREAU I NVESTIGATIO NS. HERETOFORE, BUREAU HAS OFFERED INTERVIEWEES. CONSULTATIO N P RI VILEGES W HEREBY A BUREAU SUPERVISOR WOULD BE AVAILABLE NEARBY, ALTHOUGH NOT ACTUALLY AT INTERVIEW, SO INTERVIEWEE MIGHT CONSULT WITH HIM SHOULD QUESTIONS ARISE AS TO PARAMETERS OF INTERVIE”
“ONSULT WITH HIM SHOULD QUESTIONS ARISE AS TO PARAMETERS OF INTERVIEW OR PRIVILEGED AREAS . THE CONSU LTANT DID NOT ACT AS A LEGAL ADVISOR. EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY, BUREAU WILL NO LONGER PROVIDE NW 65994 Docld:32176523 Page 9 G D ; PAGE THREE ON-THE-SCENE PERSONNEL FOR CONSULTATION ”
“THE BUREAU AND SUGGEST THAT IF HE IS C ONTACTED FOR 9/4/75 62-15065-3A SEARCHED SERIA LIZED INDEXED FILED SEP 4 1975 FBI-NEW YORK NW 65994 Docld:32176523 Page 8 7 PAGE TWO INTERVIEW, HE MAY CONTACT THE LEGAL COUNSEL DIVISION BY COLLECT CALL FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. IN THE USUAL C”
“CIES, INCLUDING FORE IGN INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES, OR INFORMATION FROM SUCH AGENCIES; AND (D) ADVERSELY AFFECT ONGOING BUREAU INVESTIGATIONS. HERETOFORE, BUREAU HAS OFFERED INTERVIEWEES. CONSULTATION PRIVILEGES WHEREBY A BUREAU SUPERVISOR WOULD BE AVAILABLE NEARBY, ALTHOUGH NOT ACTU”
“ONFIDENTIALIT Y AGREEMENT W ITH THE BUR EAU A ND SUGG EST THAT IF HE IS CONTACTED FOR 9/4/75 62-1 50 65-3A SEARCHED SERIALIZED INDEXED FILED SEP 4 1975 FBI-NEW YORK NW 65994 Docld:32176523 Page 8 7 PAGE TWO INTERVIEW, HE MAY CONTACT THE LEGAL COUNSEL DIVISION BY COLLECT CALL FOR ”
“OFFERED INTERVIEW EES. CONSULTATION PRIVILEGES WHE REB Y A BUREAU SUPERVI SOR WOULD BE A VAILABLE NE ARBY, ALTHOUGH NOT ACTUALLY AT INTERVIEW, SO INTERVIEWEE MIGHT CONSULT WITH HIM SHOULD QUESTIONS ARISE AS TO PARAMETERS OF INTERVIEW OR PRIVILEGED AREAS. THE CONSULTANT DID NOT AC”
“YMENT, HE SHOULD BE IN ST RUCED TO CONTACT LEGAL COUNSEL, FBIHQ, BY COLLECT CALL. YOUR CONVERSAT ION S WITH FORMER EMPLOYEES MUST BE IN KEEPING WI TH OUR PLEDGE. IT IS BELIEV”
“THE SSC, THE BUREAU FREQUENTLY LEARNS FROM THE SSC OR OTH ER WISE THAT FORMER EMPLOYEES ARE B EI NG CONSIDERED FOR INTERVIEW BY THE SSC STAFF. INSTRUCTIONS ARE ISSUED FOR THE FIELD OFFICE TO CONTACT THE FORMER EMPLOYEE TO ALERT HIM AS TO POSSIBLE INTERVIEW, REMIND HIM OF HIS CONF”
“YMENT, HE SHOULD BE INSTRUCTED TO CONTACT LEGAL COUNSEL, FBIHQ, BY COLLECT CALL. YOU R CONVERSATIONS WITH FORMER EMPLOYEES MUST BE IN KEEPING WITH OUR PLEDGE. IT IS BELIEVED SUCH A PROCEDURE WOULD INSURE PROPER PROTECTION AND ALSO FACILITATE THE WORK OF THE SSc. THE ABOVE PROCEDU”
“GAL COUNSEL DIVISION BY COLLECT CALL FOR FULL INFORMATION TO ASSIST HIM, INCLUDING OBLIGATIONS AS TO CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION ACQUIRED AS FBI EMPLOYEE. IT IS EMPHASIZED THAT BUREAU'S OFFER OF ASSISTANCE IS NOT INTENDED TO IMPEDE SSC WORK BUT IS DONE AS COOPERATIVE GESTURE A”
“THE CONF IDENTI ALITY AGREEMENT FOR THE INTE RVIEW WITHI N SPECIFIED PARAMETERS, AND ( 3) THAT THER E ARE FOUR PRIVILEGED AREAS IN WHICH HE IS NOT REQUIRED TO ANSWER QUESTION. THESE AREAS : ARE RELATING TO INFORMATION WHICH MAY (A) IDENTIFY BUREAU SOURCES; (B) REVEAL SENSITIVE ME”
“UREAU INVESTIGATIONS. HERETOFORE, BUREAU HAS OFFERED INTERVIEWEES. CONSULTA TI ON PRIVILEGES WHEREBY A BUREAU SUPERVISOR WOULD BE AVAILABLE NEARBY, ALTHOUGH NOT ACTUALLY AT INTERVIEW, SO INTERVIEWEE MIGHT CONSULT WITH HIM SHOULD QUESTIONS ARISE AS TO PARAMETERS OF INTERVIEW OR PR”
“T DID NOT ACT AS A LEGAL ADVISOR. EFFEC TIVE IMMEDIATELY, BUREAU WILL NO LONGER PROVIDE NW 65994 Doc ld:32176523 Page 9 G D ; PAGE THREE ON-THE-SCENE PERSONNEL FOR CONSULTATION PURPOSES TO ASSIST EITHER CURRENT OF FORMER EMPLOYEES. PROSPECTIVE INTERVIEWEES SHOULD BE TOLD THAT, IF”
“LU DIN G O BLI GAT ION S A S T O C ONF IDE NTI ALI TY OF INFORMATION ACQUIRED AS FBI EMPLOYEE. IT IS EMPHASIZED THAT BUREAU'S OFFER OF ASSISTANCE IS NOT INTENDED TO IMPEDE SSC WORK BUT IS DONE AS COOPERATIVE GESTURE AND TO SAFEGUARD SENSITIVE BUREAU INFORMATION. CONTACTS WITH THE”
“MATION FROM SUCH AGENCIES; AND (D) ADVERSELY AFFECT ONGOING BUREAU INVESTIGATIONS. HERETOFORE, BUREA U HAS OFFE RED I NTERVI EWEES. CONSULTATION PRIV ILEGES WHEREBY A BUREAU SUPERVISOR WOULD BE AVAILABLE NEARBY, ALTHOUGH NOT ACTUALLY AT INTERVIEW, SO INTERV IEWE E MIGH T CONSULT ”
“T TO DIVULGE INFOR- MATION OBTAINED BY VIRTUE OF HIS PAST-FBI EMPLOYMENT, HE SHOULD BE INSTRUCTED TO CONTACT LEG AL COUNSEL, FBIHQ, BY COLLECT CALL. YOU R CONVERSATIONS WITH FORMER EMPLOYEES MUST BE IN KEEPING WI TH OUR PL ED GE. IT IS B ELIEVED SUC H”
“E BEING CONSIDERED FO R INTERVIEW BY THE SSC STAFF. IN STR UCTIONS ARE IS SUED FOR THE F IELD OFFICE TO CONTACT THE FORMER EMPLOYEE TO ALERT HIM AS TO POSSIBLE INTERVIEW, REMIND HIM OF HIS CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT WITH THE BUREAU AND SUGGEST THAT IF HE IS CONTACTED FOR 9/4/75 62”
“THE FORMER EMPLOYEE MAY, AFTER BEI NG CON TA CTE D B Y S SC STAFF, CONTACT BUREAU'S LEGAL COUN SEL D IVISION BY COLLECT CALL FOR FULL INFORMATION TO ASSIST HIM, INCLUDING OBLIGATIONS AS TO CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMA FBI EMPLOYEE. IT IS EMPHAS TION ACQUIRED AS IZED THAT BUREAU'S O”
“THE FORMER EMPLOYEE MAY, AFTER BEI NG CON TA CTE D B Y S SC STAFF, CONTACT BUREAU'S LEGAL COUN SEL D IVISION BY COLLECT CALL FOR FULL INFORMATION TO ASSIST HIM, INCLUDING OBLIGATIONS AS TO CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMA FBI EMPLOYEE. IT IS EMPHAS TION ACQUIRED AS IZED THAT BUREAU'S O”
“THAT FORMER EMPLO YEES ARE BEING CONSIDERED FO R IN TERVIEW BY THE SSC STAFF. INSTRUCTION S ARE ISSU ED FOR THE FIELD OFFICE TO CONTACT THE FORMER EMPLOYEE TO ALERT HIM AS TO POSSIBLE INTERVIEW, REMIND HIM OF HIS CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT WITH THE BUREAU AND SUGGEST THAT IF HE IS”
“G CONTACTED BY SSC STAFF, CONTACT BUREAU'S LEGAL COUNSEL DIVISION BY COLLECT CALL FOR F ULL I NF ORM ATION TO ASSIST HIM, INCLUDING OBLIGATIONS AS TO CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMA FBI EMPLOYEE. IT IS EMPHAS TION ACQUIRED AS IZE D T HAT BUREAU'S OFFER OF ASSISTANCE IS NOT INTENDED TO”
“G CONTACTED BY SSC STAFF, CONTACT BUREAU'S LEGAL COUNSEL DIVISION BY COLLECT CALL FOR F ULL I NF ORM ATION TO ASSIST HIM, INCLUDING OBLIGATIONS AS TO CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMA FBI EMPLOYEE. IT IS EMPHAS TION ACQUIRED AS IZE D T HAT BUREAU'S OFFER OF ASSISTANCE IS NOT INTENDED TO”
“REMIND HIM OF HIS CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT WITH THE BUREAU AND SUGGEST THAT IF HE IS CONTACTED FOR 9/4 /75 62-15065-3A SEARCHED SERIA LIZED INDEX ED F ILE D SEP 4 1 97 5 FBI-NEW YORK NW 65994 Docld:32176523 Page 8 7 PAGE TWO I NTERVIEW, HE MAY CONTACT THE LEGAL COUNSEL DIVI SION”
“EING CONTACTED BY SSC STAFF, CONTACT BUREAU'S LEGAL COUNSEL DIVISION BY COLLECT CALL FO R FULL INFOR MATION TO ASSIST HIM INCLUDING OBLIGATIONS AS TO CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION ACQUIRED AS FBI EMPLOYEE. IT IS EMPHASIZED THAT BUREAU'S OFFER OF ASSISTANCE IS NOT INTENDED TO IMP”
“ERT HIM AS TO POSSIBLE INTERVIEW, REMIND HIM OF HIS CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT WITH THE BUREAU AND SU GGEST THAT IF HE IS CONTACTED FO R 9/4/75 62- 15065-3A SEAR CHED SERIALIZ ED INDEXED FILED SEP 4 1975 FBI-NEW YORK NW 65994 Docld:32176523 Page 8 7 PAGE TWO INTERVIEW, HE MAY CONT”
“UT IS D ON E AS COOP ER ATIVE GESTURE ALD TO SAFEGUARD SEN SITIVE BUREAU INFORMATION, CONTA CTS WITH THESE FORIE R ENFLOY EES TO BE HALDLE D PERSONALLY BY SAC OR ASAC. IN EVENT THIS NOT FEASIBLE FOR JUST CAUSE, TO BE HANDLED BY A SENIOR SUPERVISOR, LUCUNBENT EXPLOYEES TO BE ADVIS”
“OACH ED B Y TH E SSC S TAFF FOR INTERVIEW. THE FORM ER EMPLOYEE MAY, AFT ER BE ING CONT ACTED BY SSC STAFF, CONTACT BUREAU'S LEGAL COUNSEL DI VISION BY COLLE CI CALL FOR FULL INFORMATION TO ASSIST HIM INCLUDING OBLIGATIONS AS TO CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION ACQUIRED AS FBI EMPL”
“L ADVISOR. EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY, BUREAU WILL NO LONGER PROVIDE NW 65994 Docld:32176523 Page 9 G D ; PAGE THREE ON-THE-SCENE PERSONNEL FOR CONSULTATION PURPOSES TO ASSIST EITHER CURRENT OF FORMER EMPLOYEES. PROSPECTIVE INTERVIEWEES SHOULD BE TOLD THAT, IF THEY DESIRE ASSISTANCE O”
“NG CONTACTED BY SSC STAFF, CONTACT BUREAU'S LEGAL COUNSEL D IVISION BY COLLECT CALL FOR FULL I NF OR MATION TO ASSIST HIM, INCLUDING OBLIGATIONS AS TO CONFIDENTIALITY OF INFORMATION ACQUIRED AS FBI EMPLOYEE. IT IS EMPHASIZED THAT BUREAU'S OFFER OF ASSISTANCE IS NOT INTENDED TO IM”
“3 NW 65994 Docld:32989794 Page 10 PAGE TWO INTERVIEW, HE MAY CONTACT THE LEGAL COUNSEL DIVISION BY C OLLECT CALL FOR FURTHER INFORMATION. IN THE USUAL CASE, AS CIRCUMSTANCES UNFOLD, THE FORMER EMPLOYEE IS TOLD(1) THAT HE HAS A RIGHT TO LEGAL COUNSEL, BUT THAT THE BUREAU CANNOT PR”
“UBMITTING TO INTERVIEWS BY REPRESENTATIVES OF CON- GRESSIONAL COMMITTEES. THE NECES SITY OF SECURING THIS AP- PROVAL IS PROMPTED BY THE EMPLOYMENT AGREEMENT ALL EMPLOYEES HAVE SIG NED. YOU WERE ADVISED THAT CONGRESSIONAL STAFF MEMBERS WERE CONDUCTING INTERVIEWS OF FORMER AND/OR C”
“IEW BY THE SSC STAFF. INSTRUCTIONS ARE ISSUED FOR THE FIE LD OFFICE TO CONTACT THE FORMER EMPLOYEE T O ALERT HIM AS TO POSSIBLE INTERVIEW, REMIND HIM OF HIS CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT WITH THE BUREAU AND SUGGEST THAT IF HE IS CONTACTED FOR SAC cl ASAC #4A #5 62-5038-7 INDEXED LIFE”
“S WHICH HAVE NOT PREVIOUSLY } HAD CURRENT OR FORMER EMPLOYEES IN ITS TERRITOY INTERVIEWED BY TH E SS C, THE BUREAU FREQUENTLY LEARNS FROM THE SSC OR OTHERWISE THAT FORMER EMPLOYEES ARE BEING CONSIDERED FOR INTERVIEW BY THE SSC STAFF. INSTRUCTIONS ARE ISSUED FOR THE FIELD OFFICE T”
“L CASE , AS CIRCUMSTANCES U NFOLD, THE FOR MER EMPLOYEE IS TOLD (1) THAT HE HAS A RIGHT TO LEGAL COU NSEL, BUT THAT THE BUREAU CANNOT PROVIDE SAME; (2) THAT THE BUREAU HAS WAIVED THE CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT FOR THE INTERVIEW WITHIN SPECIFIED PARAMETERS, AND (3) THAT THERE ARE F”
“ESE FORMER ENFLOYEES IS TO DE IMMEDIATELY CON- 62-2854-6 NW 65994 Docld:32989498 Page 18 یکند T OYOT ASTE PAGE THO TACTED AND ALERTED THAT HE (SHE) JIGHT BE APPROACHED BY THE SSC STAFF, SUBJECT MATTER UNKNOWN. THEY SHOULD BE TOLD THAT IN ΤΗΣ EVENT THEY ARE INTERVIEVED AND DURING ”
“OR OTHERWISE THAT FORMER EMPLOYEES ARE BEING CONSIDERED FOR INTERVIEW BY THE SSC STAFF. INSTRUCTIONS ARE ISSUED FOR THE FIELD OFFICE TO CONTACT THE FORMER EMPLOYEE TO ALERT HIM AS TO POSSIBLE INTERVIEW, REMIND HIM OF HIS CONFIDENTIALITY AGREEMENT WITH THE BUREAU AND SUGGEST THAT ”
“VISION BY COLLECT CALL FOR FULL INFORMATION TO ASSIST HIM, INCLUDING OBLIGATIONS AS TO CONFIDENTIALI TY OF INFORMATION ACQUIRED AS FBI EMPLOYEE. IT IS EMPHASIZED THAT BUREAU'S OFFER OF ASSISTANCE IS NOT INTENDED TO IMPEDE SSC WORK BUT IS D ON E AS COOPERATIVE GESTURE AND TO SAFEG”
“REQUEST THAT AN FB I AGENT B E PRESENT. BUREAU WILL PROVIDE AGENT ON REQUEST OF INTERVIE WE E. A S A PRELUDE TO INTERVIEW, THE FORMER EMPLOYEE MAY, AFTER BEI NG CONTACTED BY SSC STAFF, CONTACT BUREAU'S LEGAL COUNSEL DIVISION BY COLLECT CALL FOR FULL INFORMATION TO ASSIST HIM, INC”