“THAT KUBARK IS NOT GIVING ANY TRAINING, BUT THAT KUBARK WAS THE SPONSOR ------------- WITH AID FOR ENTIRE TRAINING.. AND MADE ARRANGEMENTS, HE WILL EXPLAIN THERE MUST HAVE BEEN $ IN 1 4 SOME MISUNDERSTANDING. HDCS DOES NOT KiSH BLOW KUBARK/ENDOMORPH a My Sons 2 - - (CONTIN”
“hat this would not be necessary. He returned our exhibits and told us to consider the matter closed. NW 65990 Docld:32392257 Page 9”
“it up. Mr. Aaron. Or may type it up. 1. \ 24 25. Mr. Kirbow. Well, is this the same point that we're NW 50955 DocId: 32423513 Page 18”
“that that this case will start moving soon. mnenlntiee”
“me Section 0.15(b) (7) under your proposed Order. The following is in response to your nemorandum of April”
“ecome Section 0.15(b) (7) under your proposed Order. The following is in response to your nemorandum of Apri”
“ecome Section 0.15(b) (7) under your proposed Order. The following is in response to your nemorandum of Apri”
“andS±af£75.Fol Director will agree to allow Counsel to be present during one Enclosures ST-106 00 mrrems ENDS-sh WOC:ebc (9) 50 APR.A. NW 88296 Dpcld:32989628 Page 136 5 CONTINUED - OVER end 6000”
“review the entire case and provide a ruling on the legitimacy of PDDONOR’s claimof $20,000. After such a ruling we can 0: . discuss our future course of action. . A- . 7. All classified Secret.1 4055/ Steven K. Rubenstein Steven K. Rubenstein Attachments: :: As Stated.’”
“13-00000■ 04/16/97 WED 16:15 FAX 202 724 0457 AKiW Mr. J. Barry Harrelson April 16, 1997 Page 12 Conclusion Please let me know if you have any supplements or corrections. We would very much like to ensure that these matters are handled expeditiously. As always, we appre”
“retain a copy of the affidavit. A copy will remain on file at the Committee and accessible to you at any time. I look forward to receiving the sworn statement. Once again many thanks for your cooperation and careful attention to this matter. Fredricka Barry Frederick D. B”
“btaining an injunction against the sale of the stock of this company within the near future. ACTION: Although the above scheme involves possible violations primarily within the jurisdiction of SEC, the New York, Boston, Miami and Newark Offices will thoroughly explore all facets ”
“involved, as by so doing he may cast off suspicion. 9 2-12-60 NW 88321 Docl:32989529 Page 1393." - 84°”
“reads, I would have or would be opposed to it because 24 it provides an exception with the approval of the versight 25 TAnEDET NW 50955 DocId: 32423513 Page 67”
“THIS ngauest Is QUEY E° . RESPONSE TO BER CEMA Is REQUES FOR CORA ACT %ITH HE AGENCY. ‘LA. 2 • DlVISI0) HAS % OPERATIONAL INEREST IN BERCKMAWS NOT HIS COMPANY OFE ICE OF GENERAL COUNSEL HAS CONCURRED I’ll CON ACTING BERCKMANS SY DCR 9 IAMT CD IPDET Ci BY 00637- SECRET E' 0”
“FOR COul ACT 3ITH HE AGENCY. LA -- , DIVISIbA HAS 20 OPER AT DORAL INEREST IF BERCKMAWS NOR HIS COMPANY. OFF ICE OF GEdERAL COUNSEL HAS CONCURRED III con ACTING BERCKMANS BY 006 MIAME. EDL/PDET CL, 3Y 0:687 - . CR E e "**— L”
“REPORTED, WERBELL AND GIBSON CURRENTLY 18 LITIGATION • NOW* REASON. Fel AGENT KENNY STATES GIOSON PROBABLY OKPAGLS ‘_PARA 1 STORY VIDELy AS MEANS EMBARRASS WGFaELl. SE C RGT 4.38 je)..”
“office should be requested to make tho Informant available to the Burean for thorough intervien ret NW 66000 Docld:32338743 Page 10 CONFIDENTIAL CONKIDENTIAL”
“"F.izzature) C. TracyBarnes Concur. Date: C/DO C, Tracy Barnes 2”
“ake The resicet. of Suck step was docutiofe cutifoofer weighing all foreters in the wor confetty aud we felt that HEWIRELESS. concluding that the hey to the solution acting in his ocon behalf. t A NW 65924 Docld:32349378 Page 3”
“BY OTHER THAN THE IS SUING OFFICE IS PR’ fr IZED AC/WHD Engume die Auruennicard.Q ormicta E 2 IMPDET Sec CL 8Y057556”
“13-00000 f, 1 b Mr. Ronald G. Haron, Esq. the Agency on important matters such as this. It is for this reason that we have chosen Mr. Cohen. If you wish to discuss this matter further, please call me on (703) 874-3123. Sedan y n 2”
“the case will be closed. a -5- XR OLUKEI 0rg “982 -NW-88326-Docld:32989Z04 Page 268”
“Let them make the determination whether 20 or not it-should be a statute. 21 Mr.Kirbow. Determine whether in the law whether it is 22 working all right under 3 the set of regulations. 23 Mr. Bader. Mr. Chairman, may I say in this instance in 24 the publishing trade ther”
“the house. (Note Below.) Michael V. SLATINSKI I would appreciate your giving personal attention to this matter, because it is rare that we have such a detailed assessment as we have in this case. Edward D. SABETAY - - T CLASSil CATION 201-735296 PAGE NO. IFORM a-64”
“disposition. Please direct any further inquiries regarding this matter to W. Curtis Chaloner at 40552 (secure). W. Curtis Chaloner for John K. Reilly FOR—OFFICIAL USE ONLY”
“you were subjected during that period of time, and 21 while you are complying with Mr. Edgar's request and working with 22 the staff in terms of the contradictory data, would you also agree 23 to work with the staff in terms of seeing that the record has a 24 complete and”
“hnical information involved. He will doubtless support any further police action which is necessary. NW 65924 Docld:32106382 Page 5”
“before the Committee voluntarily and to have me interview him if he so agreed. If he did not agree, we would then take it before the Com- NW 50955 DocId:32423630 Page 635”
“he instructed MEROLA at that time to have nothing to do with the matter and he should not handle it. NW 64578 Docld:32332334 Page 3 - 2 -”
“jurisdiction of the Bureau? 23 i Mr. Tovar. I think in that context it might have been 24 appropriate for the Agency, if the assumed the point you made,: ne A to seek an interview with him. I think the appropriate NW 48331 DocId: 32277210 Page 18 TOP CFORET”
“on Mr. Cherne." 2. We are closing this case. Should further action be required, 1. we will reopen. E. M. ASHORAFT RSTravie/1mp SENSITIVE 07440 otv. as, Gil”
“Her acute and inquisitive mind has been an asset to my staff, and I believe she would be an asset to yours. Sincere ly , Pet Melvin L. Wulf Legal Director MLW/alf NW 88326 Docl:32239494 Page 20”
“02 NO need an attorney you'have the. .right to ask for an 02 1 1 / attorney, do you understand that? wo 02 NW 50955 DocId: $2281988 Page 3 TOP SECRET”
“filing *suit was one of the main considerations for choosing this course of action. Should any of the recipients of this letter decide to contact or write Novel I would appreciate being notified prior to '■ your doing so. Our. Legal Department wants to be kept abreast of any”
“connection with cases captioned: BERNARD S. LEE, Y REC-46 CLARENCE M. KEPA 62-117290-638 ET (U.S.D .C., D.C.) CIVIL ACTION #76-1185 B UF ILE 62-117194 -Bureau (Encs. 14) (1-package) 2-M emphi”
“pertaining to him has not been feasible." w N /s e 3. (U) Recommendations: See Tabs 12-4S. ig "d s p 4. (U) This memorandum has as yet not been coordinated XX with Mr. Zicbell of the Office of the General Counsel. is q p z g riyalA Winthrop W. Brown (C) -e v ”
“ee offices GRB:jsc Thank you for your cc: Mr. Robert M. Stutman Director cooperation in this matter. Sincerely, 2. Not Bleesay G. Robert Blakey Chief Counsel and Director Office of Congressional Affairs cc: Mr. Robert L. Keuch Deputy Assistant Attorney General NW 66000 Docld:3224”
“of.”- • that meeting. Subj reported that Loginov had called him on 15 Apr requesting - a meet somewhere outside; Subj insisted that Loginov come to his office. -: CA Rdp Co (P-2712) 1P-- 11713 0 00”
“directive or something to that effect. 23 Mr. Aaron. Certain categories. 24 Mr. Bader. Certain categories. 25 Mr. Kirbow. That is brand new ground. TAD gecomT NW 50955 DocId: 32423513 Page 7”
“14-00000 2434, / Ny, ■ Mr. Durddic relative to any information be may furnish concerning :-: poskiela /Aversive activities or the part of any of the e individuals. It would be appreciated if you would endeavor to have Darlia interviewed at the earliest possible date. ”
“certainly have placed a severe burden on the FCD. Further, NOSENKO contends that the results which might reasonably be expected would be of little' or no practical value to the SCD. 0001170 10”
“disagree with the AG being in on the 23 act, but this one gets you participation on disposition. Senator Huddleston. Well, figure a way to get it done. 1 24 25 Mr. Aaron. Well, what I wanted to say was I would like to Ton egnem NW 50955 DocId: 32423513 Page 74”
“observation of his surprise at what he interpreted to be reticence to date to interveww. Mr. Halpern. 3 S70017 374817172”
“- Now, I realize that we have said that our other recommen 22 - dation by implication, would prohibit this, but it is only by 23 implication, I would think. 24 Mr. Maxwell. My sense is that by providing this 25 Mr. Aaron. You kind of create a channel. TAR ERPDET • NW 50”
“E TO BE RETAINED. THOSE NOT INDICATED FOR PETENTION ARE AUTHOR. ZED FOR IMMEDATE DESTRUCTION 4. 141c NW 65990 Docld:32404765 Page 2 ☐ CONTINUED ON SEPARATE PAGE 115-30)”
“understanding they could be passed to Counsel for Werbell due to subsequent events noted below, it is not certain that this occurred. Specifically, the undersigned declined to release. additional "Brady" documents without consultation and instructions 1 - 1”
“put in a great deal .of work on that, or 23 without knowing the facts, I might add. 24 Mr. Kirbow. The' Other thing is the .Committee may want 25 to support legislation that is already pending. - TAneAReG HW 50955 DocId:32423513 Page 26.”
“would preclude the Board from disputing the validity of such a regulation at a later date.' None of the above options guarantee success. However, I have discussed these options with Dawn Eilenberger, and we believe that Option #_ is the best approach to take. OIM concurs. Ple”
“matter and see no need to pursue it further at this time. Attachment: Sohn Tins Tarwag JCHN kb MAURY Legislative Counsel Plutribetion: Original - CLC Subject ehe 1.20? 1 - Chief, Ci State 1 - Chief, SB Division 1 - D Security * - EG 1 - OLC Chroco EGRET so”