“13-00000 19 1% ""ed and Solemn duty, cometanion to investigate the aonnssipation of J. Kennedy.” Time, "Warren Commission Report: Verdict, One Man Alone." World VerkMognzine, 7 October 1964, 11 December 1963, pp. 26-27. PP. 9-10. Testimony and evidence, 4 Dec …”
“… e end of his research, Posner notified Bob Loomis, his editor at Random House, that he had taken an unexpected turn. "I was convinced the Warren Commission had gotten it right. The evidence was overwhelming," he said. Posner also was aware, of course, that a large majority of the populace th …”
“13-00000 inal convictions a case equally persuasive. press, and I read some of the documents He added that there was no foundation for that have criticized the Commission very the charge that the Commission had been severely, but I have never found that they 114941 L' XSSM1”
“… cember 1966, pp. 44-4B. Podhoretz, PP. 295-299. Norman, she warsen vormae.... An Editorial." Go—votary, January 1964, God Cort, A.L. "Tie Warren Commission from a Procedural Standpoint." New York University "The Warren Commission. La Reviru, May 1965, pp. 404-423. "The M-sterten of the Kenned …”
“… - - - - -Footnotes- n52. See Holland, supra note 18, at 52. n53. See id. at 56-57. n54. See id. at 57. nS5. See id. at 56; see also Warren Commission Report, supra note 15, at 290-92 (finding that Oswald purportedly distributed pamphlets on behalf of the Fair Play for Cuba Committee, bu …”
“… to investigate 26-27. '“’, pp. 26-27, M' Warren Report? sdria, Vincent J. "The Warren Report? A Philadelphia Lavyar Analyses med." Um. "Warren Commission Report: Verdict, One Not Alone.” World Week Naaarine, 1 October 1964, Wounds...” liberation. March 1965, pp. 14-32, Back and Neck Woundes …”
“… ughton. Inc., "Commant 1966, by Staughton Keltseine. 9. Lynd," Liberation Magazine, 9, ee. no. 10 (2965), „ 10. s, Robert 7. "Why the Warren Commission?" New York University Lav Review, May 1965, MacDonald, Dwight. "A Critique of the Warren Report," Esquire, March 1963, p. 59. 1965, p, 59. …”
“… ertain Stations and Bases NO INDEXING REQUIRED INFO. • ONLY QUALIFIED DESK « CAN JUDGE INOExmO FROM Chief, WOLIME MICROFILM SUBJECT 0 Warren Commission Report: Article on the Investigation Conducted by District Attorney Garrison ACTION REQUIRED • REFERENCES ; 1. We are forwarding herew …”
“Oswald, Frank, Kan nan Stale pa Oswald, A Massure of Achievement," Nation, % Noverber 1 X. and A.L. Goodhart. "Warren Commission: tie critics and the law; theories of E.J. Epstein and M. Lme," Reporter. 15 December 1966, pp. 44-48, 1 » Packer. Herbert L. "The Warren …”
“… t 3 for legitimacy for Cooed finton Marcus, Raymond. The Bastard Bullet;_npna——— wore, and proving doubts questioning the verdict of the Warren Commission," Newsweek, Angeles: Rendell Publications, 1966. 10 October 1966, pp. 36+. Los -- - * — *• the Warren Commission, the authorities, a Dmll …”
“… cal evidence, and, therefore, it "failed to establish the number of shots ... scientifically"). - - - - -End Footnotes- - • Fifth, the Warren Commission Report all 888 pages of it was the work of lawyers, who not only dominated the Commission, but also its staff, the true authors of the Re …”
“… : Bantan Books, 1964. IV Vl ne* rald T., and John B. Stiles, Portraits of an Assassin. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1965, Paul L. "The Warren Commission and the Fourth Shot: A Reflection on the Fundamentals i 1 "New Tori Time New YorkConor “O'Brien, "Nightmare Times Rune 48 Pages of Re …”
“Warren Commission is tapes. Of course, these few thousand feet ;. sir," he replied. No stress. former Chief Justice Earl Warren himself. of recording tape a …”
“… Publications Lynd, Staughton. Inc., "Comment 1968, by Staughton Lynd." Liberation Magazine, 9, no. 10 (1965), fr’mm, Robert 9. "Why the Warren Commission?" New York University Law Review, Hay 1965, MacDonald, Dwight. "A Critique of the Warren Report. Enquire. March 1965, p. 59. pp. 477-533. …”
“the Warren Report. i’s principal investigators, also spoke on Again there was stress, and particularly 7. Jim Garrison had little or no case CBS tapes. He said that the case against hard stress on the words "no evidence," against Clay Shaw. sa d fitted together very well, and ”
“… - . 1966. Zurich: Schweizer Verlagshaun, New York: Marzani & Munsell, 1965.. 371-372. 1 The Capa in the Warren Prport. when, Jacch. "The Warren Commission report and its Critics." Frontier, November 1966, ■111*•* of the Record. of the President » Cog r7. 5-20. Johnson, Marion M., comp. Prelim …”
“Meetings Warren Commission A Mem bers of the PROHD RANKI N, WILLIN S 14 Ja nuary 1964 RANKIN 12 Mar ch 1964 27 March 1964 26 May 1964 28 August 1964* 12 Oct ober 1964 …”
“… 1566 Mansell, 1965. Review, May 1965, $04 *371-372.- 1 Zurich: Schweizer Verlasshaune Wk Marsa 6of the President’s Comate , Jacob, "The Warren Commission report and its Critics." Frontier. November 1966, pp. 3-20. 1 wh Johnson,The . ---- Cape on‘’the *« in the WerreeofPan— rfit^:. Ass …”
“… ary 19, 1970. Senator Richard 3. Russell, er. he news sauced a sketch which, he which conflicted with a version of events a member of the Warren Commission, re- d, did represent these locations accu- they believed to be essentially true, vealed that he had never believed that Lee ely. The int …”
“… sination of President Kennedy, Report of the President's Commission on the Assassination of President John F. Kennedy (1964) [hereinafter Warren Commission Report]. nl6. The members of the Warren Commission were Chief Justice Earl Warren, Senator Richard B. Russell, Senator John Sherman Coop …”
“… pp. 449-503. F+t. Arnold 1. "JFK in Dallas: The Warren Reper: and Ita Critics." Saturday Review. Montagu, Ivor. "The Warren Report. “The Warren Commission and the Legal Process." Case and Co-ment Mas Mosk, Richard M. 21 Jonuory 1967, p. 36. May-June 1967, pp. 13-20. des Warren-Reports." Fra …”
“… The Man.theTheWarren Court.Report: The Six Wise Men of Industan. 1965 Weaver, John D. Warren: <-‘th, LH, "Thinking the unthinkable: the Warren Commission books." Publishers Weekly, Weisberg. Harold. The Report on--------- _ Warren Report. Hyattstown, Md., 1965. 10 October 1956, P. 55. -__ _ …”
“most detailed on the CBS Kennedy assassination and the Warren about the assassination? es. and I charted most of it with the PSE. Commission came up only once. The inter- We should first examine the testimony in ■ /as clear to me that he believed much viewer, Abram Sachar, Chan”
“13-00000 i««w>> owpe G na Vo vf V&GV WIG VVauisStOn very the charge that the Commission had been severely, but I have never found that they TW a0 formed to whitewash the facts. have discovered any evidence of any kind $200 AI ^ The PSE said he was telling the truth. that ”
“… eport." Whew York Times Rams 48 Pages of 1. -Editor --------->... A Publisher. 3. "Nevrweek, 1964.P. 4 8 June 1364. Fr --, Paul L. The Warren Commission and the Fourth Shot: A Reflection on the Fundamentals of Ferensle Fact Finding." low York Jnivrit L , May 1965. Cany ‘, Char’cs. Ar. Exar …”
“always equals deception. Unfor- McCloy; former Chief Justice Earl Warren. tony before tre Commission. Assuming that there is a 70 percent’ tunately, I do not know that. But the PSE *........................... ). The claim by a member of the Warren chance that any single ins”
“Parten Convirsion. Mundelein, III.: Callaghan & Co. n.d, (Journal of the Records Service, General Services rtf the Warren. Commission ROrt 29-5 Ferrnete Sciences) Jones, Penn, Forgive My ertef: a critical review Midlothian, Texas: “Mid loth 1 an Mirror, 19 Cent. Pred J. * aga”
“… ge Teacher Says." Los Angeles Times. 17 November 1967, p. 28% pp. 12, 14, 16. Cowentery, April 1967, R.M. "Thinking the unthinkable: the Warren Commission books." "Warren’s Secret." Hatlonsl Review. 3 April 1964. on. 265-266.' 10 October 1966, p. 35. "Washington Novel Kennedy Shot Twice in t …”
“… , $ October 1964, pp. 43-46. Nay-Juna 1967, PP- 13-20 Die Kritikar das Werren-Raporte," Frankfurt oa Mat F. ”M others sea us; concerning Warren Commission Report." Saturday Beylev. Muhlen, Norbert. "Hard, und Legends, Commission report and its critics. Der Monste 17 (1965), 14-28. 7 Novecher …”
“is almost he was saying, but the frequent flick- deis University, was friendly and deferen certain that these people were telling the of moderate stress and the occasion- tial. I charted some of Warren's remarks truth as they saw it. This strongly suggests es of hard stress s”
“seven-tenths : y; that none of the Warren Report's the very sinister implications of the very raised to the eighth power, or approximately ever found anything the Commission existence of deception among policemen, 6 percent. - - issed; that he had found nothing since governmen”
“shot from that direction. A claim by a Dallas policeman that r he nor Officer Tippitt knew Oswald. , The claim by the pathologist—the n Commission's only source of infor-. ■ ton nothing worse than blundering. iner. Captain Humes: Commission staffer .. n about the autopsy—tha”
“… . 2964, PP. 474-676, Rev Leedes. 12 October "The Warren Report: the Triumph of Caliban." 1964, PPe critiques, , Edward J. inquest: the Warren Commission and the establishment of truth. New York: Viking Bread. 19*6. soot 99 John Kennedy. 1e Repport Varren SE SSE-ErLe-SUSR Michel, Amand, L …”
“Roper, Hugh R. "Slovenly Warren Report." . U.S. News and World Report, 9 December 1963, pp. 68-71. about Kennedy Assassination; was the WarrenAtlas, ........ 1965, February an pp. to115-118 nance prove a "Attorney for Oswald." Tine. 6 March 1964, p. 47. theory? With intervie”
“supportive of the Commission's findings; although it now appears that the sequencing of the shots fired in Dealey Plaza was somewhat different from that described by the Commission. n62 Ironically, even when the latest techniques cor- [♦11]. roborate the Commission's findings”
“dy published in the Warren Commission report. (It is these two that he has published in The New York Review of Books article which Mr . B elin at taches to his me morandu m.) I …”
“testimony to the War this window. the PSE finds stress in testimony, it results ren Commission, but later had doubts. The 5. The claim that a gunman was seen from something other than lying. Commission found evidence of a conspir- a different wincow of that building. Now, l”
“… Sunday, October 16, 1966. Wesley Liebler, hoped that the CBS tapes would yield more reed. He picked a number between one a member of the Warren Commission’s staff, enlightening results. d ten. I asked him, "Is the number one?" was the guest. The transcript was of a CBS finally received a cal …”
“"The Assassination, the Warren Commission and the public interest." U.S. Nevn and HOE--------- I 47. Motive, February 1967, pp. 6-14. March 1964, P. "Attorney for Oswald,” Time. 6 …”
“… en, to hear. SHERR: Even if people accepted the physical evidence gathered here in Dealey Plaza, and agreed that it tended to support the Warren Commission's findings, that would not end the speculation. Surveys show that most Americans doubt that Lee Harvey Oswald acted alone, believing inst …”
“… ople who said the mass of bloody sheets were not on the K enne dy stretcher against the wall but on the Connally stretcher outwards, so the Warren Commission con- cluded this bullet had to be found on the Connally stretcher. 14 15 I say this bec aus e o bvi ously the question as to what bullet wh …”
“… , 16 December 1963, p. 10, 60-64, Co -to, n.. "Prection of Fre-school Children to the Ansannination of President Kennedy." "Autopay on the Warren Commission: Time Ecsay," Tirs, 16 September 1966, pp. 54-55, Yevin oileren. Wovewher 1964, pp. 100-105. - "Between two fires: Mro. Onvald’s testimony …”
“John R. Death of the President, The Warren Commission on Trial, Covina, California pp. 604-524. of the Warren Canstet. 89 He York University Law Review, May 1965, Collectors Pub., 1967. Nati …”
“Lyndon B. Johnson, and headed by Chief Justice Earl Warren of the U. S. Supreme Court, published its Acknowledgements and Notices 58 report in September 1964. and concluded that Oswald Epilogue 59 was the sole assassin and that there was no conspir Bibliography 60 acy. • In”
“… e at that precise moment does in fact raise an incredible specter / and may indeed have been the. monumental slip-up that critics of the Warren Commission now attest to. NW 50955 DocId:32423630 Page 34 ■”
“… corded testimony of twenty-two persons—eyewitnesses, Dallas policemen, the pathologist who conducted the autopsy, members and staff of the Warren Commission, Jim Garrison, Clay Shaw, and even Earl Warren.. I ran the tapes through the PSE systematically, taking each controversial point in turn …”
“… corded testimony of twenty-two persons—eyewitnesses, Dallas policemen, the pathologist who conducted the autopsy, members and staff of the Warren Commission, Jim Garrison, Clay Shaw, and even Earl Warren. I ran the tapes through the PSE systematically, taking each controversial point in turn. …”
“… nce ary 19, 1970, Senator Richard B. Russell, ie now produced a sketch which, he which conflicted with a version of events a member of the Warren Commission, re did represent these locations accu- they believed to be essentially true. vealed that he had never believed that Lee - The interview …”
“percent think there was an official coverup."). Indeed, there is now a much more conspiracy-minded attitude toward the assassination than there was even 15 years ago. See id. n21. See, e.g., Brustein, supra note 10 ("Viewers of JFK ... might find themselves shaken in their v”
“… eport. 16 December 1963, p. 10. 63-64.... .K. "Reaction of Pre-school Children to the Assassination of President Kennedy," "Autopsy on the Warren Commission: Time Essay," Tine. 16 September 1966, pp. 54-53. fomin Children, November 1964, pp. 100-105, "Between two fires: Mrs. Oswald’s testimony …”